Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review

Background: Language discordance occurs when the patient and the healthcare provider are not proficient in the same language. Language discordance in the critical care setting is a significant global issue because of its implications in the quality of care and outcomes of patients who do not speak t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyun Seong Seo, Amanda J. Tsao, Michael I. Kim, Betty M. Luan-Erfe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Anesthesia Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2813-5806/2/1/7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850030384503324672
author Hyun Seong Seo
Amanda J. Tsao
Michael I. Kim
Betty M. Luan-Erfe
author_facet Hyun Seong Seo
Amanda J. Tsao
Michael I. Kim
Betty M. Luan-Erfe
author_sort Hyun Seong Seo
collection DOAJ
description Background: Language discordance occurs when the patient and the healthcare provider are not proficient in the same language. Language discordance in the critical care setting is a significant global issue because of its implications in the quality of care and outcomes of patients who do not speak the primary language of the country in which they receive healthcare. Studies show that language-discordant, critically ill patients have increased use of restraints during mechanical ventilation, increased length of stay, and more frequent complications. Communication challenges are magnified in the intensive care unit because of the medical complexity and frequent need for challenging conversations regarding goals of care. To address language-based disparities in critical care, numerous qualitative studies in recent years have attempted to understand the barriers that providers face when caring for language-discordant patients. Our systematic review is the first to analyze this developing body of literature and identify barriers for which solutions must be sought to ensure equitable care. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception up to 20 February 2024. From among 2150 articles, nine articles were selected, which included eight qualitative studies and one cross-sectional study. Three studies were high quality, five were moderate quality, and one was low quality. Results: We found four major barriers to caring for language-discordant patients in the critical care setting. These included limitations in providers’ knowledge of best practices in professional medical interpreter use, challenges in navigating interpreters’ multiple roles, and limitations with different interpretive modalities and system constraints. These barriers caused clinicians distress due to clinicians’ desire to provide empathic care that respected patients’ autonomy and ensured patients’ safety and understanding. Conclusion: Interventions to increase providers’ knowledge of best practices, integrate interpreters into the critical care team, strategize the use of interpretation modalities, and address system-based barriers are needed to improve the care of language-discordant, critically ill patients worldwide.
format Article
id doaj-art-edd18b4fbb334e479dd031d88364e6fc
institution DOAJ
issn 2813-5806
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Anesthesia Research
spelling doaj-art-edd18b4fbb334e479dd031d88364e6fc2025-08-20T02:59:14ZengMDPI AGAnesthesia Research2813-58062025-03-0121710.3390/anesthres2010007Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic ReviewHyun Seong Seo0Amanda J. Tsao1Michael I. Kim2Betty M. Luan-Erfe3Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USAKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USAKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USADepartment of Anesthesiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo St., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USABackground: Language discordance occurs when the patient and the healthcare provider are not proficient in the same language. Language discordance in the critical care setting is a significant global issue because of its implications in the quality of care and outcomes of patients who do not speak the primary language of the country in which they receive healthcare. Studies show that language-discordant, critically ill patients have increased use of restraints during mechanical ventilation, increased length of stay, and more frequent complications. Communication challenges are magnified in the intensive care unit because of the medical complexity and frequent need for challenging conversations regarding goals of care. To address language-based disparities in critical care, numerous qualitative studies in recent years have attempted to understand the barriers that providers face when caring for language-discordant patients. Our systematic review is the first to analyze this developing body of literature and identify barriers for which solutions must be sought to ensure equitable care. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception up to 20 February 2024. From among 2150 articles, nine articles were selected, which included eight qualitative studies and one cross-sectional study. Three studies were high quality, five were moderate quality, and one was low quality. Results: We found four major barriers to caring for language-discordant patients in the critical care setting. These included limitations in providers’ knowledge of best practices in professional medical interpreter use, challenges in navigating interpreters’ multiple roles, and limitations with different interpretive modalities and system constraints. These barriers caused clinicians distress due to clinicians’ desire to provide empathic care that respected patients’ autonomy and ensured patients’ safety and understanding. Conclusion: Interventions to increase providers’ knowledge of best practices, integrate interpreters into the critical care team, strategize the use of interpretation modalities, and address system-based barriers are needed to improve the care of language-discordant, critically ill patients worldwide.https://www.mdpi.com/2813-5806/2/1/7interpreterlanguage-discordantlimited English proficientintensive care unitcritical care
spellingShingle Hyun Seong Seo
Amanda J. Tsao
Michael I. Kim
Betty M. Luan-Erfe
Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review
Anesthesia Research
interpreter
language-discordant
limited English proficient
intensive care unit
critical care
title Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review
title_full Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review
title_short Providers’ Perspectives on Communication Barriers with Language-Discordant Patients in the Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review
title_sort providers perspectives on communication barriers with language discordant patients in the critical care setting a systematic review
topic interpreter
language-discordant
limited English proficient
intensive care unit
critical care
url https://www.mdpi.com/2813-5806/2/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunseongseo providersperspectivesoncommunicationbarrierswithlanguagediscordantpatientsinthecriticalcaresettingasystematicreview
AT amandajtsao providersperspectivesoncommunicationbarrierswithlanguagediscordantpatientsinthecriticalcaresettingasystematicreview
AT michaelikim providersperspectivesoncommunicationbarrierswithlanguagediscordantpatientsinthecriticalcaresettingasystematicreview
AT bettymluanerfe providersperspectivesoncommunicationbarrierswithlanguagediscordantpatientsinthecriticalcaresettingasystematicreview