The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health
Abstract The early detection of plant pests and diseases is vital to the success of any eradication or control programme, but the resources for surveillance are often limited. Plant health authorities can however make use of observations from individuals and stakeholder groups who are monitoring for...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
CABI
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | CABI Agriculture and Bioscience |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43170-020-00016-5 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832573323724193792 |
|---|---|
| author | Nathan Brown Ana Pérez-Sierra Peter Crow Stephen Parnell |
| author_facet | Nathan Brown Ana Pérez-Sierra Peter Crow Stephen Parnell |
| author_sort | Nathan Brown |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The early detection of plant pests and diseases is vital to the success of any eradication or control programme, but the resources for surveillance are often limited. Plant health authorities can however make use of observations from individuals and stakeholder groups who are monitoring for signs of ill health. Volunteered data is most often discussed in relation to citizen science groups, however these groups are only part of a wider network of professional agents, land-users and owners who can all contribute to significantly increase surveillance efforts through “passive surveillance”. These ad-hoc reports represent chance observations by individuals who may not necessarily be looking for signs of pests and diseases when they are discovered. Passive surveillance contributes vital observations in support of national and international surveillance programs, detecting potentially unknown issues in the wider landscape, beyond points of entry and the plant trade. This review sets out to describe various forms of passive surveillance, identify analytical methods that can be applied to these “messy” unstructured data, and indicate how new programs can be established and maintained. Case studies discuss two tree health projects from Great Britain (TreeAlert and Observatree) to illustrate the challenges and successes of existing passive surveillance programmes. When analysing passive surveillance reports it is important to understand the observers’ probability to detect and report each plant health issue, which will vary depending on how distinctive the symptoms are and the experience of the observer. It is also vital to assess how representative the reports are and whether they occur more frequently in certain locations. Methods are increasingly available to predict species distributions from large datasets, but more work is needed to understand how these apply to rare events such as new introductions. One solution for general surveillance is to develop and maintain a network of tree health volunteers, but this requires a large investment in training, feedback and engagement to maintain motivation. There are already many working examples of passive surveillance programmes and the suite of options to interpret the resulting datasets is growing rapidly. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-edd15eac687a437a8d19bcc39eb01700 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2662-4044 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | CABI |
| record_format | Article |
| series | CABI Agriculture and Bioscience |
| spelling | doaj-art-edd15eac687a437a8d19bcc39eb017002025-02-02T05:11:19ZengCABICABI Agriculture and Bioscience2662-40442020-10-011111610.1186/s43170-020-00016-5The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant healthNathan Brown0Ana Pérez-Sierra1Peter Crow2Stephen Parnell3Woodland HeritageTree Health Diagnostics and Advisory Service, Forest ResearchObservatree, Forest ResearchSchool of Science Engineering and Environment, University of SalfordAbstract The early detection of plant pests and diseases is vital to the success of any eradication or control programme, but the resources for surveillance are often limited. Plant health authorities can however make use of observations from individuals and stakeholder groups who are monitoring for signs of ill health. Volunteered data is most often discussed in relation to citizen science groups, however these groups are only part of a wider network of professional agents, land-users and owners who can all contribute to significantly increase surveillance efforts through “passive surveillance”. These ad-hoc reports represent chance observations by individuals who may not necessarily be looking for signs of pests and diseases when they are discovered. Passive surveillance contributes vital observations in support of national and international surveillance programs, detecting potentially unknown issues in the wider landscape, beyond points of entry and the plant trade. This review sets out to describe various forms of passive surveillance, identify analytical methods that can be applied to these “messy” unstructured data, and indicate how new programs can be established and maintained. Case studies discuss two tree health projects from Great Britain (TreeAlert and Observatree) to illustrate the challenges and successes of existing passive surveillance programmes. When analysing passive surveillance reports it is important to understand the observers’ probability to detect and report each plant health issue, which will vary depending on how distinctive the symptoms are and the experience of the observer. It is also vital to assess how representative the reports are and whether they occur more frequently in certain locations. Methods are increasingly available to predict species distributions from large datasets, but more work is needed to understand how these apply to rare events such as new introductions. One solution for general surveillance is to develop and maintain a network of tree health volunteers, but this requires a large investment in training, feedback and engagement to maintain motivation. There are already many working examples of passive surveillance programmes and the suite of options to interpret the resulting datasets is growing rapidly.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43170-020-00016-5SurveillanceCitizen scienceUnstructured dataEarly warningTree health |
| spellingShingle | Nathan Brown Ana Pérez-Sierra Peter Crow Stephen Parnell The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health CABI Agriculture and Bioscience Surveillance Citizen science Unstructured data Early warning Tree health |
| title | The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health |
| title_full | The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health |
| title_fullStr | The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health |
| title_full_unstemmed | The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health |
| title_short | The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health |
| title_sort | role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health |
| topic | Surveillance Citizen science Unstructured data Early warning Tree health |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43170-020-00016-5 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nathanbrown theroleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT anaperezsierra theroleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT petercrow theroleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT stephenparnell theroleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT nathanbrown roleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT anaperezsierra roleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT petercrow roleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth AT stephenparnell roleofpassivesurveillanceandcitizenscienceinplanthealth |