Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times

IntroductionExposure to microgravity results in physiological deconditioning, including orthostatic intolerance. Artificial gravity (AG) from short-arm centrifuges is being tested in ground-based studies to counter these effects. Orthostatic tolerance testing with centrifuges before and after these...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Stead, A. P. Blaber, D. N. Divsalar, D. Xu, K. Tavakolian, J. Evans, R. Billette de Villemeur, M-P Bareille, A. Saloň, B. Steuber, N. Goswami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1464028/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849315472295591936
author T. Stead
A. P. Blaber
A. P. Blaber
D. N. Divsalar
D. Xu
K. Tavakolian
K. Tavakolian
J. Evans
R. Billette de Villemeur
M-P Bareille
A. Saloň
B. Steuber
N. Goswami
N. Goswami
N. Goswami
author_facet T. Stead
A. P. Blaber
A. P. Blaber
D. N. Divsalar
D. Xu
K. Tavakolian
K. Tavakolian
J. Evans
R. Billette de Villemeur
M-P Bareille
A. Saloň
B. Steuber
N. Goswami
N. Goswami
N. Goswami
author_sort T. Stead
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionExposure to microgravity results in physiological deconditioning, including orthostatic intolerance. Artificial gravity (AG) from short-arm centrifuges is being tested in ground-based studies to counter these effects. Orthostatic tolerance testing with centrifuges before and after these spaceflight analogs could determine the efficacy of an AG countermeasure to orthostatic tolerance. However, there has not been an investigation on how long before analog testing AG orthostatic tolerance data would remain valid for such a study.MethodsA secondary analysis of two experiments involving AG orthostatic tolerance testing (starting at 0.6 for females and 0.8 Gz for males and increased by 0.1 Gz every 3 minutes until presyncope) conducted 7 months apart at MEDES revealed 4 male and 3 female participants who had taken part in both.ResultsComparisons of participants’ time to presyncope between the two tests using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) showed a significant relationship in time to presyncope between the two test dates (LCCC = 0.98) for males but not for females (LCCC = −0.64). While the cardiovascular data from one female was unusable, the mean heart rate responses to increasing artificial gravity during the orthostatic tolerance procedure showed a strong linear correlation between the two tests for all other participants (all p < 0.008). The LCCC heart rate changes with centrifuge level varied across male participants from 0.61 to 0.97, suggesting that the high LCCC for time to presyncope was achieved with varied HR baselines between the two test dates.DiscussionThese findings indicate that time-to-presyncope tests may remain valid up to 7 months after the testing date for males. We highly recommend further study with larger numbers of male and female participants.
format Article
id doaj-art-edcbe651176a46d7a2ffaaa89e92717d
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-042X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj-art-edcbe651176a46d7a2ffaaa89e92717d2025-08-20T03:52:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2025-05-011610.3389/fphys.2025.14640281464028Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance timesT. Stead0A. P. Blaber1A. P. Blaber2D. N. Divsalar3D. Xu4K. Tavakolian5K. Tavakolian6J. Evans7R. Billette de Villemeur8M-P Bareille9A. Saloň10B. Steuber11N. Goswami12N. Goswami13N. Goswami14Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaBiomedical Engineering Program, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaBiomedical Engineering Program, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, United StatesBiomedical Engineering, Retired, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United StatesInstitut de Médecine et de Physiologie Spatiales, Toulouse, FranceInstitut de Médecine et de Physiologie Spatiales, Toulouse, FranceGravitational Physiology and Aging Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Löwi Research Center of Vascular Biology, Immunity and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaGravitational Physiology and Aging Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Löwi Research Center of Vascular Biology, Immunity and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaGravitational Physiology and Aging Research Unit, Division of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Otto Löwi Research Center of Vascular Biology, Immunity and Inflammation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaCenter for Space and Aviation Health, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesHealth Sciences Division, Innlandet University College, Innlandet, NorwayIntroductionExposure to microgravity results in physiological deconditioning, including orthostatic intolerance. Artificial gravity (AG) from short-arm centrifuges is being tested in ground-based studies to counter these effects. Orthostatic tolerance testing with centrifuges before and after these spaceflight analogs could determine the efficacy of an AG countermeasure to orthostatic tolerance. However, there has not been an investigation on how long before analog testing AG orthostatic tolerance data would remain valid for such a study.MethodsA secondary analysis of two experiments involving AG orthostatic tolerance testing (starting at 0.6 for females and 0.8 Gz for males and increased by 0.1 Gz every 3 minutes until presyncope) conducted 7 months apart at MEDES revealed 4 male and 3 female participants who had taken part in both.ResultsComparisons of participants’ time to presyncope between the two tests using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) showed a significant relationship in time to presyncope between the two test dates (LCCC = 0.98) for males but not for females (LCCC = −0.64). While the cardiovascular data from one female was unusable, the mean heart rate responses to increasing artificial gravity during the orthostatic tolerance procedure showed a strong linear correlation between the two tests for all other participants (all p < 0.008). The LCCC heart rate changes with centrifuge level varied across male participants from 0.61 to 0.97, suggesting that the high LCCC for time to presyncope was achieved with varied HR baselines between the two test dates.DiscussionThese findings indicate that time-to-presyncope tests may remain valid up to 7 months after the testing date for males. We highly recommend further study with larger numbers of male and female participants.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1464028/fullshort-arm human centrifugepresyncopecardiovascularheart rateblood pressure
spellingShingle T. Stead
A. P. Blaber
A. P. Blaber
D. N. Divsalar
D. Xu
K. Tavakolian
K. Tavakolian
J. Evans
R. Billette de Villemeur
M-P Bareille
A. Saloň
B. Steuber
N. Goswami
N. Goswami
N. Goswami
Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
Frontiers in Physiology
short-arm human centrifuge
presyncope
cardiovascular
heart rate
blood pressure
title Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
title_full Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
title_fullStr Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
title_short Repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
title_sort repeatability of artificial gravity tolerance times
topic short-arm human centrifuge
presyncope
cardiovascular
heart rate
blood pressure
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1464028/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tstead repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT apblaber repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT apblaber repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT dndivsalar repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT dxu repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT ktavakolian repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT ktavakolian repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT jevans repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT rbillettedevillemeur repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT mpbareille repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT asalon repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT bsteuber repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT ngoswami repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT ngoswami repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes
AT ngoswami repeatabilityofartificialgravitytolerancetimes