Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia

<b>Objectives:</b> This analytical cross-sectional study evaluates diagnostic approaches for active condylar hyperplasia using bone SPECT techniques. <b>Methods</b>: it was compared the effectiveness of relative activity assessments between condyles and quantitative analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luz Kelly Anzola, Natalia Venegas, Maria Clara Jaramillo, Sergio Moreno, Mauricio Hinojosa, Enrique Amador, Martin Orozco, Fernando Mut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/22/2548
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850267481905561600
author Luz Kelly Anzola
Natalia Venegas
Maria Clara Jaramillo
Sergio Moreno
Mauricio Hinojosa
Enrique Amador
Martin Orozco
Fernando Mut
author_facet Luz Kelly Anzola
Natalia Venegas
Maria Clara Jaramillo
Sergio Moreno
Mauricio Hinojosa
Enrique Amador
Martin Orozco
Fernando Mut
author_sort Luz Kelly Anzola
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objectives:</b> This analytical cross-sectional study evaluates diagnostic approaches for active condylar hyperplasia using bone SPECT techniques. <b>Methods</b>: it was compared the effectiveness of relative activity assessments between condyles and quantitative analysis using the condyle/clivus ratio. <b>Results</b>: This study’s findings reveal that the condyle/clivus ratio method significantly outperforms the relative uptake method, achieving a sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI: 84.1–94) compared to 40.7% (95% CI: 33.5–48.2), and a specificity of 77.1% (95% CI: 67.4–85) versus 72.9% (95% CI: 62.9–81.5). The condyle/clivus ratio also showed a more favorable negative likelihood ratio of 0.13 compared to 0.82 for relative uptake, and a higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8360 versus 0.5679. Statistically significant differences were noted (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). The condyle/clivus ratio method effectively identifies affected condyles in unilateral and bilateral condylar hyperplasia cases. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study emphasizes the importance of incorporating comprehensive clinical evaluations and imaging modalities for assessing condylar growth activity, underscoring the need for tailored reference values in different populations to ensure reliable diagnostic interpretations.
format Article
id doaj-art-edbb0d9b8ee2403a98c789c249bfd180
institution OA Journals
issn 2075-4418
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj-art-edbb0d9b8ee2403a98c789c249bfd1802025-08-20T01:53:45ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182024-11-011422254810.3390/diagnostics14222548Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar HyperplasiaLuz Kelly Anzola0Natalia Venegas1Maria Clara Jaramillo2Sergio Moreno3Mauricio Hinojosa4Enrique Amador5Martin Orozco6Fernando Mut7Nuclear Medicine Unit, Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota 110131, ColombiaNuclear Medicine Postgraduate Program, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogota 110931, ColombiaMaxillofacial Surgery Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota 110131, ColombiaClinical Epidemiologist, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota 111311, ColombiaMedicina Nuclear Sanitas Palermo, Bogota 111311, ColombiaMaxillofacial Surgery Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota 110131, ColombiaMaxillofacial Department, Clinica Universitaria Colombia, Bogota 110911, ColombiaNuclear Medicine Unit, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay<b>Objectives:</b> This analytical cross-sectional study evaluates diagnostic approaches for active condylar hyperplasia using bone SPECT techniques. <b>Methods</b>: it was compared the effectiveness of relative activity assessments between condyles and quantitative analysis using the condyle/clivus ratio. <b>Results</b>: This study’s findings reveal that the condyle/clivus ratio method significantly outperforms the relative uptake method, achieving a sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI: 84.1–94) compared to 40.7% (95% CI: 33.5–48.2), and a specificity of 77.1% (95% CI: 67.4–85) versus 72.9% (95% CI: 62.9–81.5). The condyle/clivus ratio also showed a more favorable negative likelihood ratio of 0.13 compared to 0.82 for relative uptake, and a higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8360 versus 0.5679. Statistically significant differences were noted (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). The condyle/clivus ratio method effectively identifies affected condyles in unilateral and bilateral condylar hyperplasia cases. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study emphasizes the importance of incorporating comprehensive clinical evaluations and imaging modalities for assessing condylar growth activity, underscoring the need for tailored reference values in different populations to ensure reliable diagnostic interpretations.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/22/2548mandibular condyletemporomandibular jointsingle-photon emission computed tomographyscintigraphyradioisotope diagnostic
spellingShingle Luz Kelly Anzola
Natalia Venegas
Maria Clara Jaramillo
Sergio Moreno
Mauricio Hinojosa
Enrique Amador
Martin Orozco
Fernando Mut
Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia
Diagnostics
mandibular condyle
temporomandibular joint
single-photon emission computed tomography
scintigraphy
radioisotope diagnostic
title Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia
title_full Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia
title_fullStr Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia
title_short Diagnostic Efficacy of Bone SPECT Techniques in Differentiating Unilateral and Bilateral Condylar Hyperplasia
title_sort diagnostic efficacy of bone spect techniques in differentiating unilateral and bilateral condylar hyperplasia
topic mandibular condyle
temporomandibular joint
single-photon emission computed tomography
scintigraphy
radioisotope diagnostic
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/22/2548
work_keys_str_mv AT luzkellyanzola diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT nataliavenegas diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT mariaclarajaramillo diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT sergiomoreno diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT mauriciohinojosa diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT enriqueamador diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT martinorozco diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia
AT fernandomut diagnosticefficacyofbonespecttechniquesindifferentiatingunilateralandbilateralcondylarhyperplasia