Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed good tolerability in the phase 3 SOLSTICE (first-line) and SUNLIGHT (later-line...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julien Taieb, Marwan Fakih, Gabor Liposits, Gerald W. Prager, Eric Van Cutsem, Fortunato Ciardiello, Nadia Amellal, Elizabeth Calleja, Mei Liu, Lucas Roby, Josep Tabernero, Thierry André
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1506075/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527141545541632
author Julien Taieb
Marwan Fakih
Gabor Liposits
Gerald W. Prager
Eric Van Cutsem
Fortunato Ciardiello
Nadia Amellal
Elizabeth Calleja
Mei Liu
Lucas Roby
Josep Tabernero
Thierry André
author_facet Julien Taieb
Marwan Fakih
Gabor Liposits
Gerald W. Prager
Eric Van Cutsem
Fortunato Ciardiello
Nadia Amellal
Elizabeth Calleja
Mei Liu
Lucas Roby
Josep Tabernero
Thierry André
author_sort Julien Taieb
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed good tolerability in the phase 3 SOLSTICE (first-line) and SUNLIGHT (later-line) trials. This pooled analysis was performed to further characterize the safety of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab and to compare safety in untreated and previously treated patients with mCRC.MethodsPatients must have received at least one dose of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in SOLSTICE (NCT03869892) or SUNLIGHT (NCT04737187). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in SOLSTICE and SUNLIGHT were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events versions 4.03 and 5.0, respectively. Times to onset/resolution of grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were assessed using Kaplan–Meier methodology. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed by age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).ResultsThe pooled safety population comprised 669 patients (SOLSTICE, n = 423; and SUNLIGHT, n = 246). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported more frequently in SOLSTICE than in SUNLIGHT (86.8% vs. 72.4%), the most common being neutropenia and anemia. Overall, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 30.6% of patients. Median time to resolution of grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events/neutropenia to grade ≤2 was 8 days. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more frequent in patients aged ≥75 years and those with an ECOG PS of 0 versus 1 or 2.ConclusionsFTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed a consistent and manageable safety profile across first- and later-line mCRC treatment, including in vulnerable patients. Hematologic TEAEs were mostly reversible with appropriate management.
format Article
id doaj-art-edad01dcc65f43e099c7ec05b5c0e284
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-edad01dcc65f43e099c7ec05b5c0e2842025-01-16T05:10:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-01-011410.3389/fonc.2024.15060751506075Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancerJulien Taieb0Marwan Fakih1Gabor Liposits2Gerald W. Prager3Eric Van Cutsem4Fortunato Ciardiello5Nadia Amellal6Elizabeth Calleja7Mei Liu8Lucas Roby9Josep Tabernero10Thierry André11Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, University Paris-Cité (Paris Descartes), SIRC CARPEM, Paris, FranceDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United StatesDepartment of Oncology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, DenmarkDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, AustriaDigestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and University of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Liuigi Vanvitelli, Naples, ItalyServier International Research Institute, Suresnes, FranceTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, United StatesTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, United StatesServier International Research Institute, Suresnes, FranceVall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain0Sorbonne University and Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, FranceBackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed good tolerability in the phase 3 SOLSTICE (first-line) and SUNLIGHT (later-line) trials. This pooled analysis was performed to further characterize the safety of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab and to compare safety in untreated and previously treated patients with mCRC.MethodsPatients must have received at least one dose of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab in SOLSTICE (NCT03869892) or SUNLIGHT (NCT04737187). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in SOLSTICE and SUNLIGHT were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events versions 4.03 and 5.0, respectively. Times to onset/resolution of grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were assessed using Kaplan–Meier methodology. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed by age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).ResultsThe pooled safety population comprised 669 patients (SOLSTICE, n = 423; and SUNLIGHT, n = 246). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported more frequently in SOLSTICE than in SUNLIGHT (86.8% vs. 72.4%), the most common being neutropenia and anemia. Overall, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 30.6% of patients. Median time to resolution of grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events/neutropenia to grade ≤2 was 8 days. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more frequent in patients aged ≥75 years and those with an ECOG PS of 0 versus 1 or 2.ConclusionsFTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed a consistent and manageable safety profile across first- and later-line mCRC treatment, including in vulnerable patients. Hematologic TEAEs were mostly reversible with appropriate management.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1506075/fullclinical trialfirst-lineSOLSTICESUNLIGHTthird-line
spellingShingle Julien Taieb
Marwan Fakih
Gabor Liposits
Gerald W. Prager
Eric Van Cutsem
Fortunato Ciardiello
Nadia Amellal
Elizabeth Calleja
Mei Liu
Lucas Roby
Josep Tabernero
Thierry André
Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
clinical trial
first-line
SOLSTICE
SUNLIGHT
third-line
title Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort pooled safety analysis of two phase 3 studies investigating trifluridine tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
topic clinical trial
first-line
SOLSTICE
SUNLIGHT
third-line
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1506075/full
work_keys_str_mv AT julientaieb pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT marwanfakih pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT gaborliposits pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT geraldwprager pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ericvancutsem pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT fortunatociardiello pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT nadiaamellal pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT elizabethcalleja pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT meiliu pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT lucasroby pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT joseptabernero pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT thierryandre pooledsafetyanalysisoftwophase3studiesinvestigatingtrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer