Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand

The rapid development of UAV-LiDAR and data processing capabilities is likely to enable accurate individual-tree inventories in the near future, requiring few on-ground calibration measurements. Using data collected from 20 radiata pine trials dispersed across New Zealand, the objective of this stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael S. Watt, Sadeepa Jayathunga, Midhun Mohan, Robin J. L. Hartley, Nicolò Camarretta, Benjamin S. C. Steer, Weichen Zhang, Mitch Bryson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/8/1456
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850180853844410368
author Michael S. Watt
Sadeepa Jayathunga
Midhun Mohan
Robin J. L. Hartley
Nicolò Camarretta
Benjamin S. C. Steer
Weichen Zhang
Mitch Bryson
author_facet Michael S. Watt
Sadeepa Jayathunga
Midhun Mohan
Robin J. L. Hartley
Nicolò Camarretta
Benjamin S. C. Steer
Weichen Zhang
Mitch Bryson
author_sort Michael S. Watt
collection DOAJ
description The rapid development of UAV-LiDAR and data processing capabilities is likely to enable accurate individual-tree inventories in the near future, requiring few on-ground calibration measurements. Using data collected from 20 radiata pine trials dispersed across New Zealand, the objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of high-density UAV-LiDAR for the prediction of tree diameter and volume, under a range of data calibration scenarios. Using all measurements for the calibration (a range of 335–4703 tree measurements across the 20 sites), accurate random forest models for each of the 20 sites were created from a diverse range of LiDAR metrics that characterised the horizontal and vertical structures of the canopy. Averaged across the 20 sites, predictions had a mean <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and relative RMSE (rRMSE) of, respectively, 0.713 and 9.699% for the tree diameter and 0.746 and 19.57% for the tree volume. Reductions in the numbers of calibration trees per trial had little effect on model accuracy until only 300 trees/site were used; however, accurate, unbiased predictions were still possible using as few as 100 trees/site. More generally, applicable random forest models for both tree dimensions were constructed by collating all of the data and tested using leave-one-site-out cross-validation to determine the accuracy of the model predictions when calibration measurements were not available. The predictions using this approach were reasonable but less accurate and more biased than with the use of calibration data, with a mean <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and rRMSE of, respectively, 0.631 and 15.12% for the tree diameter and 0.631 and 35.6% for the volume. Our research aims to facilitate the transition from a plot-based to tree-level inventory in plantation forests and contribute to the future development of a generalised model that could accurately predict tree dimensions from UAV-LiDAR, relying on minimal field measurements.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed9dfe87825940aeb8a9a793fc78fe98
institution OA Journals
issn 2072-4292
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj-art-ed9dfe87825940aeb8a9a793fc78fe982025-08-20T02:18:01ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922025-04-01178145610.3390/rs17081456Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New ZealandMichael S. Watt0Sadeepa Jayathunga1Midhun Mohan2Robin J. L. Hartley3Nicolò Camarretta4Benjamin S. C. Steer5Weichen Zhang6Mitch Bryson7Scion, 10 Kyle St., Christchurch 8011, New ZealandScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua 3046, New ZealandEcoresolve, San Francisco, CA 94105, USAScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua 3046, New ZealandScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua 3046, New ZealandScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua 3046, New ZealandAustralian Centre for Robotics, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaAustralian Centre for Robotics, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaThe rapid development of UAV-LiDAR and data processing capabilities is likely to enable accurate individual-tree inventories in the near future, requiring few on-ground calibration measurements. Using data collected from 20 radiata pine trials dispersed across New Zealand, the objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of high-density UAV-LiDAR for the prediction of tree diameter and volume, under a range of data calibration scenarios. Using all measurements for the calibration (a range of 335–4703 tree measurements across the 20 sites), accurate random forest models for each of the 20 sites were created from a diverse range of LiDAR metrics that characterised the horizontal and vertical structures of the canopy. Averaged across the 20 sites, predictions had a mean <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and relative RMSE (rRMSE) of, respectively, 0.713 and 9.699% for the tree diameter and 0.746 and 19.57% for the tree volume. Reductions in the numbers of calibration trees per trial had little effect on model accuracy until only 300 trees/site were used; however, accurate, unbiased predictions were still possible using as few as 100 trees/site. More generally, applicable random forest models for both tree dimensions were constructed by collating all of the data and tested using leave-one-site-out cross-validation to determine the accuracy of the model predictions when calibration measurements were not available. The predictions using this approach were reasonable but less accurate and more biased than with the use of calibration data, with a mean <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and rRMSE of, respectively, 0.631 and 15.12% for the tree diameter and 0.631 and 35.6% for the volume. Our research aims to facilitate the transition from a plot-based to tree-level inventory in plantation forests and contribute to the future development of a generalised model that could accurately predict tree dimensions from UAV-LiDAR, relying on minimal field measurements.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/8/1456DBHdiameter at breast heightforest inventoryindividual tree modellingLiDARL1 sensor
spellingShingle Michael S. Watt
Sadeepa Jayathunga
Midhun Mohan
Robin J. L. Hartley
Nicolò Camarretta
Benjamin S. C. Steer
Weichen Zhang
Mitch Bryson
Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand
Remote Sensing
DBH
diameter at breast height
forest inventory
individual tree modelling
LiDAR
L1 sensor
title Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand
title_full Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand
title_fullStr Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand
title_short Predicting Tree-Level Diameter and Volume for Radiata Pine Using UAV LiDAR-Derived Metrics Across a National Trial Series in New Zealand
title_sort predicting tree level diameter and volume for radiata pine using uav lidar derived metrics across a national trial series in new zealand
topic DBH
diameter at breast height
forest inventory
individual tree modelling
LiDAR
L1 sensor
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/8/1456
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelswatt predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT sadeepajayathunga predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT midhunmohan predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT robinjlhartley predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT nicolocamarretta predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT benjaminscsteer predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT weichenzhang predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand
AT mitchbryson predictingtreeleveldiameterandvolumeforradiatapineusinguavlidarderivedmetricsacrossanationaltrialseriesinnewzealand