Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in the Russian Federation (RF), accounting for 20.9% of the female population in Russia. The surgery remains the primary treatment for breast cancer. Development and improvement of various options for reconstructive plastic surgery p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Yu. Vlasova, A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev, I. V. Reshetov, A. S. Sukhotko, E. K. Saribekyan, F. N. Usov, I. M. Shirokikh, T. S. Berestok, A. V. Tregubova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: QUASAR, LLC 2020-09-01
Series:Исследования и практика в медицине
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/589
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849241204457209856
author M. Yu. Vlasova
A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev
I. V. Reshetov
A. S. Sukhotko
E. K. Saribekyan
F. N. Usov
I. M. Shirokikh
T. S. Berestok
A. V. Tregubova
author_facet M. Yu. Vlasova
A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev
I. V. Reshetov
A. S. Sukhotko
E. K. Saribekyan
F. N. Usov
I. M. Shirokikh
T. S. Berestok
A. V. Tregubova
author_sort M. Yu. Vlasova
collection DOAJ
description Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in the Russian Federation (RF), accounting for 20.9% of the female population in Russia. The surgery remains the primary treatment for breast cancer. Development and improvement of various options for reconstructive plastic surgery provides medical, psychological and social rehabilitation in patients with breast cancer, allows to achieve the best aesthetic and functional results. The possibility of performing such operations contributes to improving the quality of life of patients. According to ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons), 80% of breast cancer reconstructions in the world are performed using silicone implants. Currently, the return of prepectoral space for placement of endoprostheses during breast reconstruction is trending, which is associated not only with the improvement of mastectomy techniques, but also with the coating of implants and the appearance of silicone highly adhesive gel filling of implants. According to the world literature data, the use of polyurethane-coated endoprostheses for prepectoral/subcutaneous reconstruction reduces the risk of capsular contracture, provides a more reliable fixation to the surrounding tissues, and thus allows breast reconstruction without the need for additional cover of the endoprosthesis. The use of the prepectoral space is characterized by a simpler operation technique compared to the retromuscular placement of the implant, the absence of damage to the large pectoral muscle, minimization of pain, reduction of the bed-day in the hospital and a faster rehabilitation period. So, this type of breast reconstruction can be considered as an alternative to submuscular implant placement in primary operable forms of breast cancer with sufficient thickness of the integumentary tissues.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed7ad969c1fc4b458abc8993bc3dad70
institution Kabale University
issn 2410-1893
language Russian
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher QUASAR, LLC
record_format Article
series Исследования и практика в медицине
spelling doaj-art-ed7ad969c1fc4b458abc8993bc3dad702025-08-20T04:00:14ZrusQUASAR, LLCИсследования и практика в медицине2410-18932020-09-0173637310.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-3-6338Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancerM. Yu. Vlasova0A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev1I. V. Reshetov2A. S. Sukhotko3E. K. Saribekyan4F. N. Usov5I. M. Shirokikh6T. S. Berestok7A. V. Tregubova8I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; P.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreI.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; P.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreI.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityON CLINIC Medical Center on TagankaP.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreI.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; P.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreBreast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in the Russian Federation (RF), accounting for 20.9% of the female population in Russia. The surgery remains the primary treatment for breast cancer. Development and improvement of various options for reconstructive plastic surgery provides medical, psychological and social rehabilitation in patients with breast cancer, allows to achieve the best aesthetic and functional results. The possibility of performing such operations contributes to improving the quality of life of patients. According to ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons), 80% of breast cancer reconstructions in the world are performed using silicone implants. Currently, the return of prepectoral space for placement of endoprostheses during breast reconstruction is trending, which is associated not only with the improvement of mastectomy techniques, but also with the coating of implants and the appearance of silicone highly adhesive gel filling of implants. According to the world literature data, the use of polyurethane-coated endoprostheses for prepectoral/subcutaneous reconstruction reduces the risk of capsular contracture, provides a more reliable fixation to the surrounding tissues, and thus allows breast reconstruction without the need for additional cover of the endoprosthesis. The use of the prepectoral space is characterized by a simpler operation technique compared to the retromuscular placement of the implant, the absence of damage to the large pectoral muscle, minimization of pain, reduction of the bed-day in the hospital and a faster rehabilitation period. So, this type of breast reconstruction can be considered as an alternative to submuscular implant placement in primary operable forms of breast cancer with sufficient thickness of the integumentary tissues.https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/589prepectoral/subcutaneous reconstructionpolyurethane-coated implantssingle-stage reconstruction for breast cancersilicone implantsskin-sparing/skin-preserving mastectomybreast reconstructive plastic surgery
spellingShingle M. Yu. Vlasova
A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev
I. V. Reshetov
A. S. Sukhotko
E. K. Saribekyan
F. N. Usov
I. M. Shirokikh
T. S. Berestok
A. V. Tregubova
Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
Исследования и практика в медицине
prepectoral/subcutaneous reconstruction
polyurethane-coated implants
single-stage reconstruction for breast cancer
silicone implants
skin-sparing/skin-preserving mastectomy
breast reconstructive plastic surgery
title Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
title_full Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
title_fullStr Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
title_short Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
title_sort prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane coated implant after skin sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer
topic prepectoral/subcutaneous reconstruction
polyurethane-coated implants
single-stage reconstruction for breast cancer
silicone implants
skin-sparing/skin-preserving mastectomy
breast reconstructive plastic surgery
url https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/589
work_keys_str_mv AT myuvlasova prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT adzikiryakhodzhaev prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT ivreshetov prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT assukhotko prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT eksaribekyan prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT fnusov prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT imshirokikh prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT tsberestok prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer
AT avtregubova prepectoralreconstructionwithpolyurethanecoatedimplantafterskinsparingmastectomyinpatientswithbreastcancer