Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system

Abstract Background Clinical PET scanners have long been explored for preclinical imaging, but limited spatial resolution and sensitivity have restricted their use for preclinical studies. The recent availability of total-body (TB) PET/CT scanners with extended axial fields of view (FOVs) has largel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia G. Mannheim, Wenhong Lan, Maurizio Conti, Franziska Siedler, Marcel A. Krueger, Kristina Herfert, Christian la Fougère, Fabian P. Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-07-01
Series:EJNMMI Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00782-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849342019587014656
author Julia G. Mannheim
Wenhong Lan
Maurizio Conti
Franziska Siedler
Marcel A. Krueger
Kristina Herfert
Christian la Fougère
Fabian P. Schmidt
author_facet Julia G. Mannheim
Wenhong Lan
Maurizio Conti
Franziska Siedler
Marcel A. Krueger
Kristina Herfert
Christian la Fougère
Fabian P. Schmidt
author_sort Julia G. Mannheim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Clinical PET scanners have long been explored for preclinical imaging, but limited spatial resolution and sensitivity have restricted their use for preclinical studies. The recent availability of total-body (TB) PET/CT scanners with extended axial fields of view (FOVs) has largely overcome sensitivity limitations, enabling potential new opportunities for small-animal imaging. This study evaluated the feasibility and performance of the Biograph Vision Quadra TB-PET/CT for rodent imaging compared to the dedicated small-animal PET scanner Inveon DPET. Material and methods Recovery coefficients (RC), image noise, and optimum image reconstruction parameters were assessed using the preclinical NEMA NU 4–2008 image quality phantom and a sub-cohort of three anesthetized mice as a proof-of-concept demonstrating the feasibility of the setup. In vivo quantification accuracy was evaluated by scanning nine frozen mice simultaneously in three different arrangements with the Quadra compared with individual scans at the Inveon. To ensure comparability, all mice were snap-frozen after 1 h uptake of [1⁸F]FDG, scanned sequentially and individually at the Inveon (90 min p.i.), and subsequently scanned at the Quadra with decay-corrected acquisition times. SUVmean and SUVmax values were determined for liver, muscle and brain regions on both systems. To evaluate potential position-dependent effects within the extended axial FOV, a single frozen mouse was scanned at multiple positions. Results Phantom rods ≥ 2 mm could be resolved with the Quadra, showing a comparable RC for larger structures, e.g. for the 5 mm rod of 1.17 compared to 1.09 (Inveon) when using point-spread-function modeling, whilst having lower noise of 5.1%SD vs 9.0%SD. No substantial position-dependent effects were detected in the phantom or single-mouse scan across the axial FOV. SUVmean values were consistent between both scanner across all investigated organs, with liver and muscle uptake remaining comparable for frame durations down to 5 s. SUVmax values exhibited greater variability, with significant differences observed in muscle and brain regions. Conclusion Despite the lower spatial resolution of the clinical TB-PET/CT scanner (~ 3–4 mm) compared to the dedicated preclinical scanner (~ 1.5 mm), robust SUVmean quantification was achievable. Together with successful in vivo imaging of anesthetized mice, these findings support the feasibility of using clinical TB-PET/CT for preclinical research, acknowledging spatial resolution as a limiting factor.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed6c8e67e35042c0afd1786f4c68e56e
institution Kabale University
issn 2197-7364
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EJNMMI Physics
spelling doaj-art-ed6c8e67e35042c0afd1786f4c68e56e2025-08-20T03:43:30ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Physics2197-73642025-07-0112112010.1186/s40658-025-00782-zFeasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT systemJulia G. Mannheim0Wenhong Lan1Maurizio Conti2Franziska Siedler3Marcel A. Krueger4Kristina Herfert5Christian la Fougère6Fabian P. Schmidt7Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University TuebingenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital TuebingenSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital TuebingenWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University TuebingenWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University TuebingenCluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of TuebingenWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University TuebingenAbstract Background Clinical PET scanners have long been explored for preclinical imaging, but limited spatial resolution and sensitivity have restricted their use for preclinical studies. The recent availability of total-body (TB) PET/CT scanners with extended axial fields of view (FOVs) has largely overcome sensitivity limitations, enabling potential new opportunities for small-animal imaging. This study evaluated the feasibility and performance of the Biograph Vision Quadra TB-PET/CT for rodent imaging compared to the dedicated small-animal PET scanner Inveon DPET. Material and methods Recovery coefficients (RC), image noise, and optimum image reconstruction parameters were assessed using the preclinical NEMA NU 4–2008 image quality phantom and a sub-cohort of three anesthetized mice as a proof-of-concept demonstrating the feasibility of the setup. In vivo quantification accuracy was evaluated by scanning nine frozen mice simultaneously in three different arrangements with the Quadra compared with individual scans at the Inveon. To ensure comparability, all mice were snap-frozen after 1 h uptake of [1⁸F]FDG, scanned sequentially and individually at the Inveon (90 min p.i.), and subsequently scanned at the Quadra with decay-corrected acquisition times. SUVmean and SUVmax values were determined for liver, muscle and brain regions on both systems. To evaluate potential position-dependent effects within the extended axial FOV, a single frozen mouse was scanned at multiple positions. Results Phantom rods ≥ 2 mm could be resolved with the Quadra, showing a comparable RC for larger structures, e.g. for the 5 mm rod of 1.17 compared to 1.09 (Inveon) when using point-spread-function modeling, whilst having lower noise of 5.1%SD vs 9.0%SD. No substantial position-dependent effects were detected in the phantom or single-mouse scan across the axial FOV. SUVmean values were consistent between both scanner across all investigated organs, with liver and muscle uptake remaining comparable for frame durations down to 5 s. SUVmax values exhibited greater variability, with significant differences observed in muscle and brain regions. Conclusion Despite the lower spatial resolution of the clinical TB-PET/CT scanner (~ 3–4 mm) compared to the dedicated preclinical scanner (~ 1.5 mm), robust SUVmean quantification was achievable. Together with successful in vivo imaging of anesthetized mice, these findings support the feasibility of using clinical TB-PET/CT for preclinical research, acknowledging spatial resolution as a limiting factor.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00782-zTotal-body PETBiograph Vision QuadraSmall animal imagingIn vivo quantificationLong axial FOV
spellingShingle Julia G. Mannheim
Wenhong Lan
Maurizio Conti
Franziska Siedler
Marcel A. Krueger
Kristina Herfert
Christian la Fougère
Fabian P. Schmidt
Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system
EJNMMI Physics
Total-body PET
Biograph Vision Quadra
Small animal imaging
In vivo quantification
Long axial FOV
title Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system
title_full Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system
title_fullStr Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system
title_short Feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total-body PET/CT system
title_sort feasibility of in vivo small animal imaging using a clinical total body pet ct system
topic Total-body PET
Biograph Vision Quadra
Small animal imaging
In vivo quantification
Long axial FOV
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00782-z
work_keys_str_mv AT juliagmannheim feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT wenhonglan feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT maurizioconti feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT franziskasiedler feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT marcelakrueger feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT kristinaherfert feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT christianlafougere feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem
AT fabianpschmidt feasibilityofinvivosmallanimalimagingusingaclinicaltotalbodypetctsystem