Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes

Freshwater fish community surveys are an important component of aquatic ecosystem management. However, the standard method for taxonomic identification currently used for these surveys, wherein fishes are manually identified in the field by a taxonomic expert, has several shortcomings. These include...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conrad James Pratt, Nicholas E. Mandrak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Fishes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/1/36
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588521171320832
author Conrad James Pratt
Nicholas E. Mandrak
author_facet Conrad James Pratt
Nicholas E. Mandrak
author_sort Conrad James Pratt
collection DOAJ
description Freshwater fish community surveys are an important component of aquatic ecosystem management. However, the standard method for taxonomic identification currently used for these surveys, wherein fishes are manually identified in the field by a taxonomic expert, has several shortcomings. These include handling-related fish injury and mortality, the need for a fish-identification expert to be present during field sampling, and additional fish mortality due to physical voucher collection. These shortcomings may be overcome using new methods such as environmental DNA (eDNA) or image analyses. While eDNA can provide fish community data through metabarcoding, it is costly and provides little ecological information. A novel, image-based method for taxonomic identification (“batch-image identification”), which addresses the shortcomings of standard and eDNA methods, was tested in this study. Fishes were captured in the field and photographed in small groups (“batches”) within fish viewers for subsequent identification by taxonomic experts. Comparing taxonomist-based identifications from batch images to specimen-based identification, batch-image identification yielded an overall species-level correct-identification rate (CIR) of 49.7%, and an overall genus-level CIR of 61.2%. CIR increased with taxonomist expertise, reaching 83% when identification was performed by expert taxonomists. Batch-image identification data also produced rarefaction curves and fish-length measurements comparable to those obtained through standard methods. Potential methodological improvements to batch-image identification, including procedural adjustments and alternative identification methods, provide direction for the continued testing and improvement of this method.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed5ae4a0c0824427818776527d189fd9
institution Kabale University
issn 2410-3888
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fishes
spelling doaj-art-ed5ae4a0c0824427818776527d189fd92025-01-24T13:32:32ZengMDPI AGFishes2410-38882025-01-011013610.3390/fishes10010036Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater FishesConrad James Pratt0Nicholas E. Mandrak1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, 1 Challenger Drive, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, CanadaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, CanadaFreshwater fish community surveys are an important component of aquatic ecosystem management. However, the standard method for taxonomic identification currently used for these surveys, wherein fishes are manually identified in the field by a taxonomic expert, has several shortcomings. These include handling-related fish injury and mortality, the need for a fish-identification expert to be present during field sampling, and additional fish mortality due to physical voucher collection. These shortcomings may be overcome using new methods such as environmental DNA (eDNA) or image analyses. While eDNA can provide fish community data through metabarcoding, it is costly and provides little ecological information. A novel, image-based method for taxonomic identification (“batch-image identification”), which addresses the shortcomings of standard and eDNA methods, was tested in this study. Fishes were captured in the field and photographed in small groups (“batches”) within fish viewers for subsequent identification by taxonomic experts. Comparing taxonomist-based identifications from batch images to specimen-based identification, batch-image identification yielded an overall species-level correct-identification rate (CIR) of 49.7%, and an overall genus-level CIR of 61.2%. CIR increased with taxonomist expertise, reaching 83% when identification was performed by expert taxonomists. Batch-image identification data also produced rarefaction curves and fish-length measurements comparable to those obtained through standard methods. Potential methodological improvements to batch-image identification, including procedural adjustments and alternative identification methods, provide direction for the continued testing and improvement of this method.https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/1/36fish surveysmonitoringtaxonomic identificationphotographyfish welfareimaging
spellingShingle Conrad James Pratt
Nicholas E. Mandrak
Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes
Fishes
fish surveys
monitoring
taxonomic identification
photography
fish welfare
imaging
title Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes
title_full Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes
title_fullStr Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes
title_short Evaluating Batch Imaging as a Method for Non-Lethal Identification of Freshwater Fishes
title_sort evaluating batch imaging as a method for non lethal identification of freshwater fishes
topic fish surveys
monitoring
taxonomic identification
photography
fish welfare
imaging
url https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/10/1/36
work_keys_str_mv AT conradjamespratt evaluatingbatchimagingasamethodfornonlethalidentificationoffreshwaterfishes
AT nicholasemandrak evaluatingbatchimagingasamethodfornonlethalidentificationoffreshwaterfishes