On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox

Abstract Energetic positive and negative cloud‐to‐ground (CG) flashes are both capable of producing sprites. Negative CGs typically outnumber the positive ones by 10 to 1. However, >99.9 % of reported sprites were found to be initiated by positive CGs—thus the polarity paradox. Here, sprites reco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfred Bing‐Chih Chen, Han Chen, Chia‐Wen Chuang, Steven A. Cummer, Gaopeng Lu, Hui‐Kuan Fang, Han‐Tzong Su, Rue‐Ron Hsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-08-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083804
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850200359264321536
author Alfred Bing‐Chih Chen
Han Chen
Chia‐Wen Chuang
Steven A. Cummer
Gaopeng Lu
Hui‐Kuan Fang
Han‐Tzong Su
Rue‐Ron Hsu
author_facet Alfred Bing‐Chih Chen
Han Chen
Chia‐Wen Chuang
Steven A. Cummer
Gaopeng Lu
Hui‐Kuan Fang
Han‐Tzong Su
Rue‐Ron Hsu
author_sort Alfred Bing‐Chih Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Energetic positive and negative cloud‐to‐ground (CG) flashes are both capable of producing sprites. Negative CGs typically outnumber the positive ones by 10 to 1. However, >99.9 % of reported sprites were found to be initiated by positive CGs—thus the polarity paradox. Here, sprites recorded by the Imager of Sprites and Upper Atmospheric Lightning (ISUAL) mission were analyzed along with extremely low‐frequency band magnetic field data to resolve this paradox. Approximately twenty‐five percent of the sprites are found to be associated with negative CG lightning. “Negative” sprites mainly congregate in the latitudinal regions below 20°, while positive sprites scatter up to 50°. The ISUAL negative sprites are evidently beyond the observable ranges of the ground sites reported in previous studies. Hence, the sprite polarity paradox is likely a selection effect of the middle‐ to high‐altitudinal observation sites. The charge moment changes and accompanying transient luminous events of sprites were also examined and found to be polarity dependent.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed4c404de23844b39c70d715744b6941
institution OA Journals
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language English
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geophysical Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-ed4c404de23844b39c70d715744b69412025-08-20T02:12:20ZengWileyGeophysical Research Letters0094-82761944-80072019-08-0146169370937810.1029/2019GL083804On negative Sprites and the Polarity ParadoxAlfred Bing‐Chih Chen0Han Chen1Chia‐Wen Chuang2Steven A. Cummer3Gaopeng Lu4Hui‐Kuan Fang5Han‐Tzong Su6Rue‐Ron Hsu7Institute of Space and Plasma Sciences National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanInstitute of Space and Plasma Sciences National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanInstitute of Space and Plasma Sciences National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanElectrical and Computer Engineering Department Duke University Durham NC USAInstitute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaInstitute of Space and Plasma Sciences National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanPhysics Department National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanPhysics Department National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanAbstract Energetic positive and negative cloud‐to‐ground (CG) flashes are both capable of producing sprites. Negative CGs typically outnumber the positive ones by 10 to 1. However, >99.9 % of reported sprites were found to be initiated by positive CGs—thus the polarity paradox. Here, sprites recorded by the Imager of Sprites and Upper Atmospheric Lightning (ISUAL) mission were analyzed along with extremely low‐frequency band magnetic field data to resolve this paradox. Approximately twenty‐five percent of the sprites are found to be associated with negative CG lightning. “Negative” sprites mainly congregate in the latitudinal regions below 20°, while positive sprites scatter up to 50°. The ISUAL negative sprites are evidently beyond the observable ranges of the ground sites reported in previous studies. Hence, the sprite polarity paradox is likely a selection effect of the middle‐ to high‐altitudinal observation sites. The charge moment changes and accompanying transient luminous events of sprites were also examined and found to be polarity dependent.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083804spritelightningISUALpolarity
spellingShingle Alfred Bing‐Chih Chen
Han Chen
Chia‐Wen Chuang
Steven A. Cummer
Gaopeng Lu
Hui‐Kuan Fang
Han‐Tzong Su
Rue‐Ron Hsu
On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox
Geophysical Research Letters
sprite
lightning
ISUAL
polarity
title On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox
title_full On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox
title_fullStr On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox
title_full_unstemmed On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox
title_short On negative Sprites and the Polarity Paradox
title_sort on negative sprites and the polarity paradox
topic sprite
lightning
ISUAL
polarity
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083804
work_keys_str_mv AT alfredbingchihchen onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT hanchen onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT chiawenchuang onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT stevenacummer onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT gaopenglu onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT huikuanfang onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT hantzongsu onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox
AT rueronhsu onnegativespritesandthepolarityparadox