Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis

BackgroundThe occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery increases the risk of mortality and disability. However, there is insufficient evidence supporting the choice of anticoagulation strategies.MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shiran Qin, Sitong Guo, Yucheng Yao, Ying He, Dandan Xu, Henghai Su, Xiaoyu Chen, Haoru Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1445485/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858445318619136
author Shiran Qin
Shiran Qin
Sitong Guo
Yucheng Yao
Yucheng Yao
Ying He
Dandan Xu
Dandan Xu
Henghai Su
Xiaoyu Chen
Haoru Meng
author_facet Shiran Qin
Shiran Qin
Sitong Guo
Yucheng Yao
Yucheng Yao
Ying He
Dandan Xu
Dandan Xu
Henghai Su
Xiaoyu Chen
Haoru Meng
author_sort Shiran Qin
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery increases the risk of mortality and disability. However, there is insufficient evidence supporting the choice of anticoagulation strategies.MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials from inception to January 2024. Studies concerning thrombosis prevention after abdominal and pelvic surgery were included. Network meta-analysis(NMA) and direct meta-analysis (DMA) methods were employed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various prophylactic strategies.ResultsTwenty clinical trials involving a total of 4923 patients were included. The DMA results showed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was more effective in preventing VTE compared to no treatment (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.19), and LMWH plus physiotherapy was more effective than LMWH (OR = 10.95; 95% CI: 1.33 to 90.40). The NMA results indicated that DOACs (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.76) and LMWH (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.77) were significantly effective in preventing venous thrombosis compared with no treatment. The cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) showed that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were the best intervention. In terms of major bleeding, unfractionated heparin (UFH) had a higher risk than LMWH, physiotherapy, and no treatment, with statistically significant differences. The SUCRA analysis indicated that physiotherapy was the best intervention for major bleeding.ConclusionExisting evidence suggests that DOACs can provide better thromboprophylaxis efficacy for patients after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery, achieving an optimal balance between efficacy and safety. LMWH has become an intervention with efficacy second only to DOACs, with similar safety.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024513090.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed1b5525cad54527b75720ab164131ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-ed1b5525cad54527b75720ab164131ef2025-02-11T11:29:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-02-011510.3389/fonc.2025.14454851445485Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysisShiran Qin0Shiran Qin1Sitong Guo2Yucheng Yao3Yucheng Yao4Ying He5Dandan Xu6Dandan Xu7Henghai Su8Xiaoyu Chen9Haoru Meng10Department of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical College, Guilin, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, ChinaBackgroundThe occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery increases the risk of mortality and disability. However, there is insufficient evidence supporting the choice of anticoagulation strategies.MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials from inception to January 2024. Studies concerning thrombosis prevention after abdominal and pelvic surgery were included. Network meta-analysis(NMA) and direct meta-analysis (DMA) methods were employed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various prophylactic strategies.ResultsTwenty clinical trials involving a total of 4923 patients were included. The DMA results showed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was more effective in preventing VTE compared to no treatment (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.19), and LMWH plus physiotherapy was more effective than LMWH (OR = 10.95; 95% CI: 1.33 to 90.40). The NMA results indicated that DOACs (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.76) and LMWH (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.77) were significantly effective in preventing venous thrombosis compared with no treatment. The cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) showed that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were the best intervention. In terms of major bleeding, unfractionated heparin (UFH) had a higher risk than LMWH, physiotherapy, and no treatment, with statistically significant differences. The SUCRA analysis indicated that physiotherapy was the best intervention for major bleeding.ConclusionExisting evidence suggests that DOACs can provide better thromboprophylaxis efficacy for patients after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery, achieving an optimal balance between efficacy and safety. LMWH has become an intervention with efficacy second only to DOACs, with similar safety.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024513090.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1445485/fullcancersurgeryvenous thromboembolismDOACmeta-analysis
spellingShingle Shiran Qin
Shiran Qin
Sitong Guo
Yucheng Yao
Yucheng Yao
Ying He
Dandan Xu
Dandan Xu
Henghai Su
Xiaoyu Chen
Haoru Meng
Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis
Frontiers in Oncology
cancer
surgery
venous thromboembolism
DOAC
meta-analysis
title Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery bayesian network based meta analysis
topic cancer
surgery
venous thromboembolism
DOAC
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1445485/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shiranqin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT shiranqin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT sitongguo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT yuchengyao comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT yuchengyao comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT yinghe comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT dandanxu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT dandanxu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT henghaisu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT xiaoyuchen comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis
AT haorumeng comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofthrombuspreventionstrategiesafterabdominalandpelviccancersurgerybayesiannetworkbasedmetaanalysis