The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia

Abstract Introduction This research was designed to compare the effectiveness of repeated low-level red light (RLRL) and 0.01% atropine on axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and choroidal parameters in children with myopia. Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuena Pang, Aicun Fu, Guangying Zheng, Weiqun Wang, Mei Zhong, Lili Shang, Minghang Chang, Xuemin Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2025-06-01
Series:Ophthalmology and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01169-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849237651766378496
author Xuena Pang
Aicun Fu
Guangying Zheng
Weiqun Wang
Mei Zhong
Lili Shang
Minghang Chang
Xuemin Jin
author_facet Xuena Pang
Aicun Fu
Guangying Zheng
Weiqun Wang
Mei Zhong
Lili Shang
Minghang Chang
Xuemin Jin
author_sort Xuena Pang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction This research was designed to compare the effectiveness of repeated low-level red light (RLRL) and 0.01% atropine on axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and choroidal parameters in children with myopia. Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, and single-blind controlled trial. Ninety-one children aged 6–12 years old were selected, with cycloplegic SER ≥ − 5.00 D and ≤ − 0.75 D. Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group and 0.01% atropine group. The primary outcomes included changes in AL, SER, and choroidal parameters after a duration of 6 months. Choroidal parameters specifically including the foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal choroidal thickness (ChT) and the foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal choroidal vessel volume (CVV). Results At 6-month follow-up, the AL and SER changes were − 0.09 mm (− 0.18, 0.01) compared to 0.13 mm (0.05, 0.24) (p < 0.001) and 0.25 D (0, 0.50) compared to − 0.25 D (− 0.53, 0) (p < 0.001) in the RLRL and 0.01% atropine groups. The foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal ChT changes were 36.38 µm (14.05, 65.39), 31.04 µm (4.09, 59.35), and 28.48 µm (5.35, 55.15), compared to 0.94 µm (− 9.20, 9.36), 3.52 µm (− 10.24, 14.45), and 6.14 µm (− 5.21, 15.69) (all p < 0.001) in the RLRL and 0.01% atropine groups. The foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal CVV changes were 0.01 μm3 (0.00, 0.02), 0.05 μm3 (0.02, 0.09), and 0.20 μm3 (0.05, 0.30) compared to 0.00 μm3 (− 0.00, 0.01), 0.01 μm3 (− 0.02, 0.03), and 0.01 μm3 (− 0.06, 0.09) (p < 0.001) in the corresponding two groups. Conclusions After 6 months of treatment, RLRL was more effective than 0.01% atropine in controlling axial elongation and myopic progression among children with myopia. The foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal ChT and foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal CVV changes in the RLRL group were significantly higher than those in the 0.01% atropine group.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed1a35220ef140329ae1c274dc2f53c8
institution Kabale University
issn 2193-8245
2193-6528
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Ophthalmology and Therapy
spelling doaj-art-ed1a35220ef140329ae1c274dc2f53c82025-08-20T04:01:53ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareOphthalmology and Therapy2193-82452193-65282025-06-011481739175410.1007/s40123-025-01169-0The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with MyopiaXuena Pang0Aicun Fu1Guangying Zheng2Weiqun Wang3Mei Zhong4Lili Shang5Minghang Chang6Xuemin Jin7Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityAbstract Introduction This research was designed to compare the effectiveness of repeated low-level red light (RLRL) and 0.01% atropine on axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and choroidal parameters in children with myopia. Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, and single-blind controlled trial. Ninety-one children aged 6–12 years old were selected, with cycloplegic SER ≥ − 5.00 D and ≤ − 0.75 D. Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group and 0.01% atropine group. The primary outcomes included changes in AL, SER, and choroidal parameters after a duration of 6 months. Choroidal parameters specifically including the foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal choroidal thickness (ChT) and the foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal choroidal vessel volume (CVV). Results At 6-month follow-up, the AL and SER changes were − 0.09 mm (− 0.18, 0.01) compared to 0.13 mm (0.05, 0.24) (p < 0.001) and 0.25 D (0, 0.50) compared to − 0.25 D (− 0.53, 0) (p < 0.001) in the RLRL and 0.01% atropine groups. The foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal ChT changes were 36.38 µm (14.05, 65.39), 31.04 µm (4.09, 59.35), and 28.48 µm (5.35, 55.15), compared to 0.94 µm (− 9.20, 9.36), 3.52 µm (− 10.24, 14.45), and 6.14 µm (− 5.21, 15.69) (all p < 0.001) in the RLRL and 0.01% atropine groups. The foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal CVV changes were 0.01 μm3 (0.00, 0.02), 0.05 μm3 (0.02, 0.09), and 0.20 μm3 (0.05, 0.30) compared to 0.00 μm3 (− 0.00, 0.01), 0.01 μm3 (− 0.02, 0.03), and 0.01 μm3 (− 0.06, 0.09) (p < 0.001) in the corresponding two groups. Conclusions After 6 months of treatment, RLRL was more effective than 0.01% atropine in controlling axial elongation and myopic progression among children with myopia. The foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal ChT and foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal CVV changes in the RLRL group were significantly higher than those in the 0.01% atropine group.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01169-0MyopiaRepeated low-level red light (RLRL)0.01% AtropineAxial lengthChoroidal thicknessChoroidal vessel volume
spellingShingle Xuena Pang
Aicun Fu
Guangying Zheng
Weiqun Wang
Mei Zhong
Lili Shang
Minghang Chang
Xuemin Jin
The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Myopia
Repeated low-level red light (RLRL)
0.01% Atropine
Axial length
Choroidal thickness
Choroidal vessel volume
title The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia
title_full The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia
title_fullStr The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia
title_short The Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red Light Versus 0.01% Atropine Treatment on Axial Length and Choroidal Parameters in Children with Myopia
title_sort effect of repeated low level red light versus 0 01 atropine treatment on axial length and choroidal parameters in children with myopia
topic Myopia
Repeated low-level red light (RLRL)
0.01% Atropine
Axial length
Choroidal thickness
Choroidal vessel volume
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01169-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xuenapang theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT aicunfu theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT guangyingzheng theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT weiqunwang theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT meizhong theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT lilishang theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT minghangchang theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT xueminjin theeffectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT xuenapang effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT aicunfu effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT guangyingzheng effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT weiqunwang effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT meizhong effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT lilishang effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT minghangchang effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia
AT xueminjin effectofrepeatedlowlevelredlightversus001atropinetreatmentonaxiallengthandchoroidalparametersinchildrenwithmyopia