Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education

This paper reflects on a trial of blended learning conducted in the elective Unit Intellectual Property at the University of Western Sydney over Summer 2008. The trial was conducted in order to establish whether a ‘replacement’ model of blended learning was suitable for law students and to assess th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Colin James
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2008-01-01
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6208
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849329249801994240
author Colin James
author_facet Colin James
author_sort Colin James
collection DOAJ
description This paper reflects on a trial of blended learning conducted in the elective Unit Intellectual Property at the University of Western Sydney over Summer 2008. The trial was conducted in order to establish whether a ‘replacement’ model of blended learning was suitable for law students and to assess the benefits and challenges this model presents. The overall results of the trial demonstrate that, with sufficient time invested in the design and production of quality learning materials, blended learning can potentially deliver significant benefits in this discipline, both to students and also to academics. In particular, the blended mode of delivery offers opportunities to make learning in law units more active, without entirely sacrificing the detailed explanations of content, typical of traditional lectures, that law students often place great value upon. By combining the best aspects of face-to-face and online teaching, this model can offer students the best of both worlds.
format Article
id doaj-art-ecd65a83de8342c9b0ef09e1f5a0feb6
institution Kabale University
issn 1033-2839
1839-3713
language English
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Legal Education Review
spelling doaj-art-ecd65a83de8342c9b0ef09e1f5a0feb62025-08-20T03:47:19ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132008-01-0118110.53300/001c.6208Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal EducationColin JamesThis paper reflects on a trial of blended learning conducted in the elective Unit Intellectual Property at the University of Western Sydney over Summer 2008. The trial was conducted in order to establish whether a ‘replacement’ model of blended learning was suitable for law students and to assess the benefits and challenges this model presents. The overall results of the trial demonstrate that, with sufficient time invested in the design and production of quality learning materials, blended learning can potentially deliver significant benefits in this discipline, both to students and also to academics. In particular, the blended mode of delivery offers opportunities to make learning in law units more active, without entirely sacrificing the detailed explanations of content, typical of traditional lectures, that law students often place great value upon. By combining the best aspects of face-to-face and online teaching, this model can offer students the best of both worlds.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6208
spellingShingle Colin James
Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education
Legal Education Review
title Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education
title_full Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education
title_fullStr Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education
title_full_unstemmed Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education
title_short Lawyer Dissatisfaction, Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education
title_sort lawyer dissatisfaction emotional intelligence and clinical legal education
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6208
work_keys_str_mv AT colinjames lawyerdissatisfactionemotionalintelligenceandclinicallegaleducation