Electrophysiological Hyperscanning of Negotiation During Group-Oriented Decision-Making
Background: This study investigates the electrophysiological (EEG) correlates underlying negotiation dynamics in dyads engaged in a shared decision-making process. Methods: Using EEG hyperscanning, we examined single-brain and inter-brain neural activity in 26 participants (13 dyads) during a struct...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Applied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/6073 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: This study investigates the electrophysiological (EEG) correlates underlying negotiation dynamics in dyads engaged in a shared decision-making process. Methods: Using EEG hyperscanning, we examined single-brain and inter-brain neural activity in 26 participants (13 dyads) during a structured negotiation task. The participants, selected for their group-oriented decision-making preference, discussed a realistic group decisional scenario while their EEG activity was recorded. EEG frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) were analyzed and Euclidean Distances were computed for measuring dissimilarity at the inter-brain neural level. Results: At the single-brain level, the results show increased delta and theta power in frontal regions, reflecting emotional engagement and goal-directed control, alongside heightened beta and gamma activity in parieto-occipital areas, linked to cognitive integration and decision-monitoring during the negotiation process. At the inter-brain neural level, we observed significant dissimilarity in frontal delta activity compared to temporo-central and parieto-occipital one, suggesting that negotiation involves independent cognitive regulation within the members of the dyads rather than complete neural synchrony. Conclusions: These findings highlight the dual role of negotiation as both a cooperative and cognitively demanding process, requiring emotional alignment and strategic adaptation. This study advances our understanding of the neurophysiological bases of negotiation and provides insights into how inter-brain dynamics shape collaborative decision-making. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-3417 |