Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds

ABSTRACT Population status and habitat use of yellow rails (Coturnicops noveboracensis), Nelson's sparrows (Ammodramus nelsoni), and Le Conte's sparrows (A. leconteii) are poorly known, so standardized surveys of these species are needed to inform conservation planning and management. A pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna M. Sidie‐Slettedahl, Kent C. Jensen, Rex R. Johnson, Todd W. Arnold, Jane E. Austin, Joshua D. Stafford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.569
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850062602178134016
author Anna M. Sidie‐Slettedahl
Kent C. Jensen
Rex R. Johnson
Todd W. Arnold
Jane E. Austin
Joshua D. Stafford
author_facet Anna M. Sidie‐Slettedahl
Kent C. Jensen
Rex R. Johnson
Todd W. Arnold
Jane E. Austin
Joshua D. Stafford
author_sort Anna M. Sidie‐Slettedahl
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Population status and habitat use of yellow rails (Coturnicops noveboracensis), Nelson's sparrows (Ammodramus nelsoni), and Le Conte's sparrows (A. leconteii) are poorly known, so standardized surveys of these species are needed to inform conservation planning and management. A protocol for monitoring secretive marsh birds exists; however, these species regularly call at night and may be missed during early morning surveys. We tested the effectiveness of autonomous recording units (hereafter, recording units) to survey these species by analyzing recorded vocalizations using bioacoustics software. We deployed 22 recording units at 54 sites in northern Minnesota and eastern North Dakota, USA, and conducted traditional broadcast surveys during May–June, 2010 and 2011. We compared detection probabilities between recording units and standard monitoring protocols using robust‐design occupancy models. On average, recording units detected 0.59 (SE = 0.11) fewer Le Conte's sparrows, 0.76 (SE = 0.15) fewer Nelson's sparrows, and 1.01 (SE = 0.14) fewer yellow rails per survey than were detected using the standard protocol. Detection probabilities using the standard protocol averaged 0.95 (yellow rail; 95% CI = 0.86–0.98), 0.93 (Le Conte's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.78–0.98), and 0.89 (Nelson's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.56–0.98), but averaged 0.71 (yellow rail; 95% CI = 0.56–0.83), 0.61 (Le Conte's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.42–0.78), and 0.51 (Nelson's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.19–0.82) using recording units. Reduced detection by recording units was likely due to the ability of human listeners to identify birds calling at greater distances. Recording units may be effective for surveying nocturnal secretive marsh birds if investigators correct for differential detectability. Reduced detectability may be outweighed by the increased spatial and temporal coverage feasible with recording units. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec8da3502f5b4f5ea0904afdd3afae75
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-ec8da3502f5b4f5ea0904afdd3afae752025-08-20T02:49:52ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402015-09-0139362663410.1002/wsb.569Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birdsAnna M. Sidie‐Slettedahl0Kent C. Jensen1Rex R. Johnson2Todd W. Arnold3Jane E. Austin4Joshua D. Stafford5Department of Natural Resource ManagementSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookings, SD 57007USADepartment of Natural Resource ManagementSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookings, SD 57007USAHabitat and Population Evaluation TeamUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service18965 County Highway 82Fergus Falls, MN 56537USADepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. Paul, MN 55108USAUnited States Geological SurveyNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research Center8711 37th Street SEJamestown, ND 58401USAUnited States Geological Survey, South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitDepartment of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State UniversityBrookings, SD 57007USAABSTRACT Population status and habitat use of yellow rails (Coturnicops noveboracensis), Nelson's sparrows (Ammodramus nelsoni), and Le Conte's sparrows (A. leconteii) are poorly known, so standardized surveys of these species are needed to inform conservation planning and management. A protocol for monitoring secretive marsh birds exists; however, these species regularly call at night and may be missed during early morning surveys. We tested the effectiveness of autonomous recording units (hereafter, recording units) to survey these species by analyzing recorded vocalizations using bioacoustics software. We deployed 22 recording units at 54 sites in northern Minnesota and eastern North Dakota, USA, and conducted traditional broadcast surveys during May–June, 2010 and 2011. We compared detection probabilities between recording units and standard monitoring protocols using robust‐design occupancy models. On average, recording units detected 0.59 (SE = 0.11) fewer Le Conte's sparrows, 0.76 (SE = 0.15) fewer Nelson's sparrows, and 1.01 (SE = 0.14) fewer yellow rails per survey than were detected using the standard protocol. Detection probabilities using the standard protocol averaged 0.95 (yellow rail; 95% CI = 0.86–0.98), 0.93 (Le Conte's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.78–0.98), and 0.89 (Nelson's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.56–0.98), but averaged 0.71 (yellow rail; 95% CI = 0.56–0.83), 0.61 (Le Conte's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.42–0.78), and 0.51 (Nelson's sparrow; 95% CI = 0.19–0.82) using recording units. Reduced detection by recording units was likely due to the ability of human listeners to identify birds calling at greater distances. Recording units may be effective for surveying nocturnal secretive marsh birds if investigators correct for differential detectability. Reduced detectability may be outweighed by the increased spatial and temporal coverage feasible with recording units. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.569autonomous recording unitdetection probabilityLe Conte's sparrowNelson's sparrowoccupancy modelingsaturated wetlands
spellingShingle Anna M. Sidie‐Slettedahl
Kent C. Jensen
Rex R. Johnson
Todd W. Arnold
Jane E. Austin
Joshua D. Stafford
Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
Wildlife Society Bulletin
autonomous recording unit
detection probability
Le Conte's sparrow
Nelson's sparrow
occupancy modeling
saturated wetlands
title Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
title_full Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
title_fullStr Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
title_short Evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
title_sort evaluation of autonomous recording units for detecting 3 species of secretive marsh birds
topic autonomous recording unit
detection probability
Le Conte's sparrow
Nelson's sparrow
occupancy modeling
saturated wetlands
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.569
work_keys_str_mv AT annamsidieslettedahl evaluationofautonomousrecordingunitsfordetecting3speciesofsecretivemarshbirds
AT kentcjensen evaluationofautonomousrecordingunitsfordetecting3speciesofsecretivemarshbirds
AT rexrjohnson evaluationofautonomousrecordingunitsfordetecting3speciesofsecretivemarshbirds
AT toddwarnold evaluationofautonomousrecordingunitsfordetecting3speciesofsecretivemarshbirds
AT janeeaustin evaluationofautonomousrecordingunitsfordetecting3speciesofsecretivemarshbirds
AT joshuadstafford evaluationofautonomousrecordingunitsfordetecting3speciesofsecretivemarshbirds