Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Conclusion: Our findings highlight that most US adults with HICP have recently used NPIs to manage their pain, but the use of specific NPIs varied considerably. The odds of using NPIs were different depending on the locations of bothersome pain. Future work should examine barriers for access to spec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natasha L. Parman, Robert H. Schmicker, Sean D. Rundell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/prm/5213178
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849731562641293312
author Natasha L. Parman
Robert H. Schmicker
Sean D. Rundell
author_facet Natasha L. Parman
Robert H. Schmicker
Sean D. Rundell
author_sort Natasha L. Parman
collection DOAJ
description Conclusion: Our findings highlight that most US adults with HICP have recently used NPIs to manage their pain, but the use of specific NPIs varied considerably. The odds of using NPIs were different depending on the locations of bothersome pain. Future work should examine barriers for access to specific NPIs or the use of NPIs by locations of bothersome pain.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb94db06eee64b999ee5f5c6794451f3
institution DOAJ
issn 1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-eb94db06eee64b999ee5f5c6794451f32025-08-20T03:08:31ZengWileyPain Research and Management1918-15232025-01-01202510.1155/prm/5213178Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional AnalysisNatasha L. Parman0Robert H. Schmicker1Sean D. Rundell2Department of Child, Family, and Population Health NursingDepartment of BiostatisticsDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicineConclusion: Our findings highlight that most US adults with HICP have recently used NPIs to manage their pain, but the use of specific NPIs varied considerably. The odds of using NPIs were different depending on the locations of bothersome pain. Future work should examine barriers for access to specific NPIs or the use of NPIs by locations of bothersome pain.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/prm/5213178
spellingShingle Natasha L. Parman
Robert H. Schmicker
Sean D. Rundell
Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Pain Research and Management
title Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_full Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_fullStr Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_short Use of Nonpharmacologic Interventions by Adults With High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_sort use of nonpharmacologic interventions by adults with high impact chronic pain in the united states a cross sectional analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/prm/5213178
work_keys_str_mv AT natashalparman useofnonpharmacologicinterventionsbyadultswithhighimpactchronicpainintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalanalysis
AT roberthschmicker useofnonpharmacologicinterventionsbyadultswithhighimpactchronicpainintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalanalysis
AT seandrundell useofnonpharmacologicinterventionsbyadultswithhighimpactchronicpainintheunitedstatesacrosssectionalanalysis