Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias

Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study biases affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait prot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta, Linda Kleist, Sándor P Fekete, Markus List, Martin H Schaefer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2024-12-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/99951
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841551367702839296
author David B Blumenthal
Marta Lucchetta
Linda Kleist
Sándor P Fekete
Markus List
Martin H Schaefer
author_facet David B Blumenthal
Marta Lucchetta
Linda Kleist
Sándor P Fekete
Markus List
Martin H Schaefer
author_sort David B Blumenthal
collection DOAJ
description Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study biases affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations, and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb931e3a8e6048f69052ff64f5d88dfb
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-084X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj-art-eb931e3a8e6048f69052ff64f5d88dfb2025-01-09T16:16:54ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2024-12-011310.7554/eLife.99951Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study biasDavid B Blumenthal0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-750XMarta Lucchetta1Linda Kleist2Sándor P Fekete3Markus List4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0941-4168Martin H Schaefer5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7503-6364Biomedical Network Science Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, GermanyDepartment of Computer Science, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany; Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Braunschweig, GermanyData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; Munich Data Science Institute (MDSI), Technical University of Munich, Garching, GermanyDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, ItalyDegree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study biases affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations, and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.https://elifesciences.org/articles/99951protein-protein interaction networkspower law distributionsstudy bias
spellingShingle David B Blumenthal
Marta Lucchetta
Linda Kleist
Sándor P Fekete
Markus List
Martin H Schaefer
Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
eLife
protein-protein interaction networks
power law distributions
study bias
title Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
title_full Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
title_fullStr Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
title_full_unstemmed Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
title_short Emergence of power law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
title_sort emergence of power law distributions in protein protein interaction networks through study bias
topic protein-protein interaction networks
power law distributions
study bias
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/99951
work_keys_str_mv AT davidbblumenthal emergenceofpowerlawdistributionsinproteinproteininteractionnetworksthroughstudybias
AT martalucchetta emergenceofpowerlawdistributionsinproteinproteininteractionnetworksthroughstudybias
AT lindakleist emergenceofpowerlawdistributionsinproteinproteininteractionnetworksthroughstudybias
AT sandorpfekete emergenceofpowerlawdistributionsinproteinproteininteractionnetworksthroughstudybias
AT markuslist emergenceofpowerlawdistributionsinproteinproteininteractionnetworksthroughstudybias
AT martinhschaefer emergenceofpowerlawdistributionsinproteinproteininteractionnetworksthroughstudybias