Reliability Analysis of Improved Type-II Adaptive Progressively Inverse XLindley Censored Data

This study offers a newly improved Type-II adaptive progressive censoring with data sampled from an inverse XLindley (IXL) distribution for more efficient and adaptive reliability assessments. Through this sampling mechanism, we evaluate the parameters of the IXL distribution, as well as its reliabi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Refah Alotaibi, Mazen Nassar, Ahmed Elshahhat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Axioms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1680/14/6/437
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study offers a newly improved Type-II adaptive progressive censoring with data sampled from an inverse XLindley (IXL) distribution for more efficient and adaptive reliability assessments. Through this sampling mechanism, we evaluate the parameters of the IXL distribution, as well as its reliability and hazard rate features. In the context of reliability, to handle flexible and time-constrained testing frameworks in high-reliability environments, we formulate maximum likelihood estimators versus Bayesian estimates derived via Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques under gamma priors, which effectively capture prior knowledge. Two patterns of asymptotic interval estimates are constructed through the normal approximation of the classical estimates and of the log-transformed classical estimates. On the other hand, from the Markovian chains, two patterns of credible interval estimates are also constructed. A robust simulation study is carried out to compare the classical and Bayesian point estimation methods, along with the four interval estimation methods. This study’s practical usefulness is demonstrated by its analysis of a real-world dataset. The results reveal that both conventional and Bayesian inferential methods function accurately, with the Bayesian outcomes surpassing those of the conventional method.
ISSN:2075-1680