Early Heidegger and Biology

In the paper, the author problematizes the attempt to aprioritize empirical sciences as well as the reduction of theoretical capacities of biology in the famous work by young Martin Heidegger Sein und Zeit. For this purpose, the relations between his Daseinsanalytik and the research findings of biol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dragan Jakovljević
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities 2025-07-01
Series:Phainomena
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/09_E-PHI_132-133_Jakovljevic.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849330152080670720
author Dragan Jakovljević
author_facet Dragan Jakovljević
author_sort Dragan Jakovljević
collection DOAJ
description In the paper, the author problematizes the attempt to aprioritize empirical sciences as well as the reduction of theoretical capacities of biology in the famous work by young Martin Heidegger Sein und Zeit. For this purpose, the relations between his Daseinsanalytik and the research findings of biology are examined. The author ties in with the criticism of Heidegger’s theses by Julius Kraft and Hans Albert. The aprioritization of everyday thinking as well as the claim of the a priori primacy of the lifeworld over the research findings of empirical sciences are rejected. Likewise, Heidegger’s thesis is rejected that biology does not give us an answer to the question, what is man, and that a crisis of fundamentals is allegedly at work in it. As Heidegger’s critique of biology may be misguided in terms of scientific theory, he may be suspected of a veiled anthropocentrism.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb8bf89f9950404ebb31344cb3dc962c
institution Kabale University
issn 1318-3362
2232-6650
language deu
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
record_format Article
series Phainomena
spelling doaj-art-eb8bf89f9950404ebb31344cb3dc962c2025-08-20T03:47:03ZdeuInstitute Nova Revija for the HumanitiesPhainomena1318-33622232-66502025-07-0134132-13315917110.32022/PHI34.2025.132-133.9Early Heidegger and BiologyDragan Jakovljević0University of Montenegro, Podgorica, MontenegroIn the paper, the author problematizes the attempt to aprioritize empirical sciences as well as the reduction of theoretical capacities of biology in the famous work by young Martin Heidegger Sein und Zeit. For this purpose, the relations between his Daseinsanalytik and the research findings of biology are examined. The author ties in with the criticism of Heidegger’s theses by Julius Kraft and Hans Albert. The aprioritization of everyday thinking as well as the claim of the a priori primacy of the lifeworld over the research findings of empirical sciences are rejected. Likewise, Heidegger’s thesis is rejected that biology does not give us an answer to the question, what is man, and that a crisis of fundamentals is allegedly at work in it. As Heidegger’s critique of biology may be misguided in terms of scientific theory, he may be suspected of a veiled anthropocentrism.https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/09_E-PHI_132-133_Jakovljevic.pdfapriorizationexistential analysisdaseinscientific knowledgebiologyantinaturalismlifeworld
spellingShingle Dragan Jakovljević
Early Heidegger and Biology
Phainomena
apriorization
existential analysis
dasein
scientific knowledge
biology
antinaturalism
lifeworld
title Early Heidegger and Biology
title_full Early Heidegger and Biology
title_fullStr Early Heidegger and Biology
title_full_unstemmed Early Heidegger and Biology
title_short Early Heidegger and Biology
title_sort early heidegger and biology
topic apriorization
existential analysis
dasein
scientific knowledge
biology
antinaturalism
lifeworld
url https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/09_E-PHI_132-133_Jakovljevic.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT draganjakovljevic earlyheideggerandbiology