Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system

Abstract Objectives Current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines expand the CAP definition to include infections occurring in patients with recent health care exposure. The guidelines now recommend that hospital syst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bradley W. Frazee, Amarinder Singh, Matt Labreche, Partow Imani, Kevin Ha, Jonathan Furszyfer Del Rio, Eugene Kreys, Robert Mccabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13061
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849690591614468096
author Bradley W. Frazee
Amarinder Singh
Matt Labreche
Partow Imani
Kevin Ha
Jonathan Furszyfer Del Rio
Eugene Kreys
Robert Mccabe
author_facet Bradley W. Frazee
Amarinder Singh
Matt Labreche
Partow Imani
Kevin Ha
Jonathan Furszyfer Del Rio
Eugene Kreys
Robert Mccabe
author_sort Bradley W. Frazee
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines expand the CAP definition to include infections occurring in patients with recent health care exposure. The guidelines now recommend that hospital systems determine their own local prevalence and predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients satisfying this new broader CAP definition. We sought to carry out these recommendations in our system, focusing on the emergency department, where CAP diagnosis and initial empiric antibiotic selection usually ooccur. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with CAP through any of 3 EDs in our hospital system in Northern California between November 2019 and October 2021. Inclusion criteria included an ED admission diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis, fever or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and consistent chest imaging result. SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive cases were excluded. We abstracted variables historically associated with P. aeruginosa and MRSA. Outcome measures were prevalence of P. aeruginosa and MRSA in the overall clinically defined cohort and among microbiologically confirmed cases and predictors of P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation, as determined by univariate logistic regression, bootstrapped least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest analyses. Additionally, we describe the iterative process used and challenges encountered in carrying out the new ATS/IDSA guideline recommendations. Results There were 1133 unique patients who satisfied our definition of clinically defined CAP, of whom 109 (9.6%) had a bacterial pathogen isolated. There were 24 P. aeruginosa isolates and 11 MRSA isolates in 33 patients. Thus, the prevalence P. aeruginosa and MRSA was 2.9% in the overall CAP cohort, but 30.3% in the microbiologically confirmed cohort. The most important predictors of either P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation were tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] 22.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.39–46.96) and gastrostomy tube (OR 14.7; 95% CI 7.14–30.26). Challenges included determining the suspected infection type in patients admitted simply for “sepsis”; interpreting dictated radiology reports; determining functional status, presence of indwelling lines and tubes, and long‐term care facility residence from the electronic health record; and correctly attributing culture results to pneumonia. Conclusion Prevalence of MRSA and P. aeruginosa was low among patients admitted in our medical system with CAP – now broadly defined – but high among those with a microbiologically confirmed bacterial etiology. Our locally derived predictors of MRSA and P. aeruginosa can be used to aid our emergency physicians in empiric antibiotic selection for CAP. Findings from this project might inform efforts at other institutions.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb2af23191084b799bdb115de92dc981
institution DOAJ
issn 2688-1152
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
spelling doaj-art-eb2af23191084b799bdb115de92dc9812025-08-20T03:21:16ZengElsevierJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522023-12-0146n/an/a10.1002/emp2.13061Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital systemBradley W. Frazee0Amarinder Singh1Matt Labreche2Partow Imani3Kevin Ha4Jonathan Furszyfer Del Rio5Eugene Kreys6Robert Mccabe7Department of Emergency Medicine Alameda Health System Highland Hospital Oakland California USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Alameda Health System Highland Hospital Oakland California USAPharmacy Department Alameda Health System Highland Hospital Oakland California USASchool of Public Health Division of Biostatistics University of California Berkeley California USADepartment of Internal Medicine Alameda Health System Highland Hospital Oakland California USAStanford University Graduate School of Business Stanford California USADepartment of Clinical and Administrative Sciences California Northstate University College of Pharmacy Elk Grove California USADepartment of Internal Medicine Infectious Disease Division Alameda Health System Highland Hospital Oakland California USAAbstract Objectives Current American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines expand the CAP definition to include infections occurring in patients with recent health care exposure. The guidelines now recommend that hospital systems determine their own local prevalence and predictors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients satisfying this new broader CAP definition. We sought to carry out these recommendations in our system, focusing on the emergency department, where CAP diagnosis and initial empiric antibiotic selection usually ooccur. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with CAP through any of 3 EDs in our hospital system in Northern California between November 2019 and October 2021. Inclusion criteria included an ED admission diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis, fever or hypothermia, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and consistent chest imaging result. SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive cases were excluded. We abstracted variables historically associated with P. aeruginosa and MRSA. Outcome measures were prevalence of P. aeruginosa and MRSA in the overall clinically defined cohort and among microbiologically confirmed cases and predictors of P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation, as determined by univariate logistic regression, bootstrapped least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest analyses. Additionally, we describe the iterative process used and challenges encountered in carrying out the new ATS/IDSA guideline recommendations. Results There were 1133 unique patients who satisfied our definition of clinically defined CAP, of whom 109 (9.6%) had a bacterial pathogen isolated. There were 24 P. aeruginosa isolates and 11 MRSA isolates in 33 patients. Thus, the prevalence P. aeruginosa and MRSA was 2.9% in the overall CAP cohort, but 30.3% in the microbiologically confirmed cohort. The most important predictors of either P. aeruginosa or MRSA isolation were tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] 22.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.39–46.96) and gastrostomy tube (OR 14.7; 95% CI 7.14–30.26). Challenges included determining the suspected infection type in patients admitted simply for “sepsis”; interpreting dictated radiology reports; determining functional status, presence of indwelling lines and tubes, and long‐term care facility residence from the electronic health record; and correctly attributing culture results to pneumonia. Conclusion Prevalence of MRSA and P. aeruginosa was low among patients admitted in our medical system with CAP – now broadly defined – but high among those with a microbiologically confirmed bacterial etiology. Our locally derived predictors of MRSA and P. aeruginosa can be used to aid our emergency physicians in empiric antibiotic selection for CAP. Findings from this project might inform efforts at other institutions.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13061antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipcommunity acquired pneumoniaemergency department
spellingShingle Bradley W. Frazee
Amarinder Singh
Matt Labreche
Partow Imani
Kevin Ha
Jonathan Furszyfer Del Rio
Eugene Kreys
Robert Mccabe
Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
antimicrobial resistance
antimicrobial stewardship
community acquired pneumonia
emergency department
title Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_full Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_fullStr Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_full_unstemmed Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_short Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia: Prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
title_sort methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa community acquired pneumonia prevalence and locally derived risk factors in a single hospital system
topic antimicrobial resistance
antimicrobial stewardship
community acquired pneumonia
emergency department
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13061
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleywfrazee methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT amarindersingh methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT mattlabreche methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT partowimani methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT kevinha methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT jonathanfurszyferdelrio methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT eugenekreys methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem
AT robertmccabe methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosacommunityacquiredpneumoniaprevalenceandlocallyderivedriskfactorsinasinglehospitalsystem