Between character, novel and libel: A seventeenth-century French traveller's view of English culture

This article analyses the case of the scandal around Samuel Sorbiere's Relation d’un voyage en Angleterre (Report of a journey to England), published in 1664. The public reaction in Eng­land, most notably Thomas Sprat's Observations on monsieur de Sorbier's “Voyage into England” (1665...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. V. Stogova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA 2022-03-01
Series:Шаги
Subjects:
Online Access:https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/64
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article analyses the case of the scandal around Samuel Sorbiere's Relation d’un voyage en Angleterre (Report of a journey to England), published in 1664. The public reaction in Eng­land, most notably Thomas Sprat's Observations on monsieur de Sorbier's “Voyage into England” (1665), provides a rare opportunity to see the reader's reaction of the English to how their national cul­ture appears in a foreigner's description. The analysis shows that the indignation was caused not by the negative comments them­selves, but by the way in which they were presented. It was inter­preted in the context of discourses and types of texts within which, in England and France in the 1660s, distance was created between the knowledgeable, sophisticated author of the statement and the object of his consideration, and equally so between the author and the reader. This article examines several French literary conven­tions that defined the manner of presentation chosen by Sorb- iere —salon literature, libertine writings and the moralistic tradi­tion — as well as those contexts within which the text written in this way was read by the English critic — political satire, scholar­ly literature and romances. The differences in literary conventions were associated with cultural and national rather than personal priorities, and therefore contributed to the institutionalization of national discourses.
ISSN:2412-9410
2782-1765