Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study

Abstract Introduction Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders occur when the definitive placenta develops within the uterus scar area. Although classically PAS develops in the anterior wall of the uterus mainly, it can also develop in the posterior uterine wall. The aim of this study was to report...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: The ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders) study group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15132
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850115453687431168
author The ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders) study group
author_facet The ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders) study group
author_sort The ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders) study group
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders occur when the definitive placenta develops within the uterus scar area. Although classically PAS develops in the anterior wall of the uterus mainly, it can also develop in the posterior uterine wall. The aim of this study was to report the risk factors, diagnostic accuracy of prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome of pregnancies complicated by posterior PAS in women with placenta previa or low‐lying. Material and Methods Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study involving 16 referral hospitals in Italy (ADoPAD Study). Inclusion criteria were patients with a posterior low‐lying placenta (<20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the os), aged ≥18 years undergoing ultrasound assessment at ≥26+0 weeks of gestation. The reference standard for PAS was represented by the failure of placental separation at delivery or by pathological analysis. The primary aim was to report the risk factors associated with the occurrence of posterior PAS. The secondary aims were to evaluate the ability of prenatal ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS and to report its surgical outcome compared to posterior placental previa or low‐lying with no PAS and anterior PAS, respectively, and in patients with a prenatal compared to post‐natal diagnosis. Univariate and diagnostic accuracy analyses were used to analyze the data. Results 258 patients were included in the analysis. Posterior PAS occurred in 8.1% (n = 21; 95% CI 5.4–12.1) of patients. There was a higher incidence of one or more prior CS (62% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and myomectomy with uterine penetration (71.0% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) in patients with posterior PAS compared to those with no PAS. In patients with posterior PAS, placenta accreta occurred in 66.67% (14/21), increta in 23.81% (5/21), and percreta in 9.52% (2/21) of cases. Posterior PAS confirmed at birth was diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound in 62% (13/21) of cases. When comparing anterior with posterior PAS, patients with anterior PAS were more likely to have a prior CS (82% vs. 62%; p = 0.0049) and placenta percreta (54% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Finally, the need for hysterectomy (89% vs. 48%; p < 0.001) was higher, while that of balloon tamponade insertion was lower (17% vs. 52%; p = 0.001) in patients with anterior compared to posterior PAS. Conclusions Prior uterine surgery in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying represents the commonest risk factors for posterior PAS. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS is lower in cases with posterior compared to anterior PAS. Finally, in referral centers, posterior PAS disorders were associated with a lower risk of hysterectomy compared to anterior PAS.
format Article
id doaj-art-ead526a5af164eb79d60c3a8df84ad8a
institution OA Journals
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-ead526a5af164eb79d60c3a8df84ad8a2025-08-20T02:36:34ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122025-07-0110471328133810.1111/aogs.15132Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter studyThe ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders) study groupAbstract Introduction Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders occur when the definitive placenta develops within the uterus scar area. Although classically PAS develops in the anterior wall of the uterus mainly, it can also develop in the posterior uterine wall. The aim of this study was to report the risk factors, diagnostic accuracy of prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome of pregnancies complicated by posterior PAS in women with placenta previa or low‐lying. Material and Methods Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study involving 16 referral hospitals in Italy (ADoPAD Study). Inclusion criteria were patients with a posterior low‐lying placenta (<20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the os), aged ≥18 years undergoing ultrasound assessment at ≥26+0 weeks of gestation. The reference standard for PAS was represented by the failure of placental separation at delivery or by pathological analysis. The primary aim was to report the risk factors associated with the occurrence of posterior PAS. The secondary aims were to evaluate the ability of prenatal ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS and to report its surgical outcome compared to posterior placental previa or low‐lying with no PAS and anterior PAS, respectively, and in patients with a prenatal compared to post‐natal diagnosis. Univariate and diagnostic accuracy analyses were used to analyze the data. Results 258 patients were included in the analysis. Posterior PAS occurred in 8.1% (n = 21; 95% CI 5.4–12.1) of patients. There was a higher incidence of one or more prior CS (62% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and myomectomy with uterine penetration (71.0% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) in patients with posterior PAS compared to those with no PAS. In patients with posterior PAS, placenta accreta occurred in 66.67% (14/21), increta in 23.81% (5/21), and percreta in 9.52% (2/21) of cases. Posterior PAS confirmed at birth was diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound in 62% (13/21) of cases. When comparing anterior with posterior PAS, patients with anterior PAS were more likely to have a prior CS (82% vs. 62%; p = 0.0049) and placenta percreta (54% vs. 10%; p < 0.001). Finally, the need for hysterectomy (89% vs. 48%; p < 0.001) was higher, while that of balloon tamponade insertion was lower (17% vs. 52%; p = 0.001) in patients with anterior compared to posterior PAS. Conclusions Prior uterine surgery in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying represents the commonest risk factors for posterior PAS. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting posterior PAS is lower in cases with posterior compared to anterior PAS. Finally, in referral centers, posterior PAS disorders were associated with a lower risk of hysterectomy compared to anterior PAS.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15132outcomeplacenta accreta spectrumultrasound
spellingShingle The ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Attachment Disorders) study group
Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
outcome
placenta accreta spectrum
ultrasound
title Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study
title_full Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study
title_fullStr Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study
title_short Risk factors, prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low‐lying placenta: A multicenter study
title_sort risk factors prenatal diagnosis and outcome of posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders in patients with placenta previa or low lying placenta a multicenter study
topic outcome
placenta accreta spectrum
ultrasound
url https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15132
work_keys_str_mv AT theadopadantenataldiagnosisofplacentalattachmentdisordersstudygroup riskfactorsprenataldiagnosisandoutcomeofposteriorplacentaaccretaspectrumdisordersinpatientswithplacentapreviaorlowlyingplacentaamulticenterstudy