A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception
Abstract Lay perceptions of risks are often at odds with their empirical assessments, particularly regarding risks of peers. Going beyond only considering perceived peer risks, this study explored whether the actual social environment of a person informs their individual COVID risk perception. A coh...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99673-7 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850042337817788416 |
|---|---|
| author | Helge Giese F. Marijn Stok Wolfgang Gaissmaier Odette Wegwarth |
| author_facet | Helge Giese F. Marijn Stok Wolfgang Gaissmaier Odette Wegwarth |
| author_sort | Helge Giese |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Lay perceptions of risks are often at odds with their empirical assessments, particularly regarding risks of peers. Going beyond only considering perceived peer risks, this study explored whether the actual social environment of a person informs their individual COVID risk perception. A cohort of Psychology freshmen (N = 88; academic year 2021/22) was surveyed about their COVID infection status in the past year, prevalence estimates within their cohort, and their social relationships. They were further queried on their expected susceptibility for a COVID infection within the forthcoming month and the potential severity of such an infection. Average student estimation of 1-year prevalence rates (71.8%) were in line with the self-reported prevalence of the cohort (69.8%, p = .110) and took infection prevalence in their social circle into account (β = 0.24, p = .025). This social circle prevalence also contributed to the individual assessment of COVID susceptibility (β = 0.24, p = .031), but not the severity of the disease (β = 0.05, p = .671). These results indicate that the perception of prevalence among peers is not necessarily biased and that social cues of prevalence in the environment are considered when estimating individual susceptibility. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ead377777b3542e6a20a864079ca8cc2 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-ead377777b3542e6a20a864079ca8cc22025-08-20T02:55:35ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-04-011511510.1038/s41598-025-99673-7A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perceptionHelge Giese0F. Marijn Stok1Wolfgang Gaissmaier2Odette Wegwarth3Heisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-based Decisions, Charité – Universitätsmedizin BerlinDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of Psychology, University of KonstanzHeisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-based Decisions, Charité – Universitätsmedizin BerlinAbstract Lay perceptions of risks are often at odds with their empirical assessments, particularly regarding risks of peers. Going beyond only considering perceived peer risks, this study explored whether the actual social environment of a person informs their individual COVID risk perception. A cohort of Psychology freshmen (N = 88; academic year 2021/22) was surveyed about their COVID infection status in the past year, prevalence estimates within their cohort, and their social relationships. They were further queried on their expected susceptibility for a COVID infection within the forthcoming month and the potential severity of such an infection. Average student estimation of 1-year prevalence rates (71.8%) were in line with the self-reported prevalence of the cohort (69.8%, p = .110) and took infection prevalence in their social circle into account (β = 0.24, p = .025). This social circle prevalence also contributed to the individual assessment of COVID susceptibility (β = 0.24, p = .031), but not the severity of the disease (β = 0.05, p = .671). These results indicate that the perception of prevalence among peers is not necessarily biased and that social cues of prevalence in the environment are considered when estimating individual susceptibility.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99673-7Social networksOptimistic biasSocial judgementSocial amplification of riskAvailability by recall |
| spellingShingle | Helge Giese F. Marijn Stok Wolfgang Gaissmaier Odette Wegwarth A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception Scientific Reports Social networks Optimistic bias Social judgement Social amplification of risk Availability by recall |
| title | A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception |
| title_full | A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception |
| title_fullStr | A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception |
| title_full_unstemmed | A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception |
| title_short | A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception |
| title_sort | social network perspective on social cues for covid risk perception |
| topic | Social networks Optimistic bias Social judgement Social amplification of risk Availability by recall |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99673-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT helgegiese asocialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT fmarijnstok asocialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT wolfganggaissmaier asocialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT odettewegwarth asocialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT helgegiese socialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT fmarijnstok socialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT wolfganggaissmaier socialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception AT odettewegwarth socialnetworkperspectiveonsocialcuesforcovidriskperception |