Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub
This article addresses gaps in knowledge about whether or not smart street furniture could enhance the relationship between people and place, and whether it improves the design, amenity and management of public open space. An Australian design team, comprising a local council, a street furniture man...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2084 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850050302148870144 |
|---|---|
| author | Nancy Marshall Kate Bishop Homa Rahmat Susan Thompson Christine Steinmetz-Weiss |
| author_facet | Nancy Marshall Kate Bishop Homa Rahmat Susan Thompson Christine Steinmetz-Weiss |
| author_sort | Nancy Marshall |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article addresses gaps in knowledge about whether or not smart street furniture could enhance the relationship between people and place, and whether it improves the design, amenity and management of public open space. An Australian design team, comprising a local council, a street furniture manufacturer, and academics, designed, built, piloted, and assessed a new piece of smart street furniture called a ‘ChillOUT Hub’. This Hub is an integrated street furniture system, designed for public open spaces. It is enabled with ‘smart’ technology features such as Wi-Fi, mobile device charging stations, plus infrastructure usage and environmental sensors. The Hub aims to support social health, improve microclimatic conditions, and provide equitable access to technology. Street survey processes were undertaken with both ‘users’ and ‘non-users’ of the Hubs. The findings help to identify what value digitally enhanced street furniture actually has in open space and how that value is perceived by the public. The Council and Hub users overwhelmingly appreciated the newly designed street furniture and its smart amenities. Non-users clarified why they did not use smart street furniture and discussed the option of having digital amenities in public spaces more generally. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eacc78a2712e4ae7882272d336002e23 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj-art-eacc78a2712e4ae7882272d336002e232025-08-20T02:53:30ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2024-12-011312208410.3390/land13122084Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT HubNancy Marshall0Kate Bishop1Homa Rahmat2Susan Thompson3Christine Steinmetz-Weiss4Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, AustraliaSchool of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts Design & Architecture, UNSW, Sydney 2052, AustraliaSchool of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts Design & Architecture, UNSW, Sydney 2052, AustraliaCity Futures Research Centre, Faculty of Arts Design & Architecture, UNSW, Sydney 2052, AustraliaSchool of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts Design & Architecture, UNSW, Sydney 2052, AustraliaThis article addresses gaps in knowledge about whether or not smart street furniture could enhance the relationship between people and place, and whether it improves the design, amenity and management of public open space. An Australian design team, comprising a local council, a street furniture manufacturer, and academics, designed, built, piloted, and assessed a new piece of smart street furniture called a ‘ChillOUT Hub’. This Hub is an integrated street furniture system, designed for public open spaces. It is enabled with ‘smart’ technology features such as Wi-Fi, mobile device charging stations, plus infrastructure usage and environmental sensors. The Hub aims to support social health, improve microclimatic conditions, and provide equitable access to technology. Street survey processes were undertaken with both ‘users’ and ‘non-users’ of the Hubs. The findings help to identify what value digitally enhanced street furniture actually has in open space and how that value is perceived by the public. The Council and Hub users overwhelmingly appreciated the newly designed street furniture and its smart amenities. Non-users clarified why they did not use smart street furniture and discussed the option of having digital amenities in public spaces more generally.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2084smart street furnitureplacesmart citiespublic space designpublic realmChillOUT Hub |
| spellingShingle | Nancy Marshall Kate Bishop Homa Rahmat Susan Thompson Christine Steinmetz-Weiss Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub Land smart street furniture place smart cities public space design public realm ChillOUT Hub |
| title | Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub |
| title_full | Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub |
| title_fullStr | Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub |
| title_full_unstemmed | Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub |
| title_short | Smart Street Furniture: User and Non-User Perspectives of the ChillOUT Hub |
| title_sort | smart street furniture user and non user perspectives of the chillout hub |
| topic | smart street furniture place smart cities public space design public realm ChillOUT Hub |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2084 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nancymarshall smartstreetfurnitureuserandnonuserperspectivesofthechillouthub AT katebishop smartstreetfurnitureuserandnonuserperspectivesofthechillouthub AT homarahmat smartstreetfurnitureuserandnonuserperspectivesofthechillouthub AT susanthompson smartstreetfurnitureuserandnonuserperspectivesofthechillouthub AT christinesteinmetzweiss smartstreetfurnitureuserandnonuserperspectivesofthechillouthub |