Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases

Indonesia, a tropical country, experiences climate variations that influence the spread of infectious diseases, including Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF). The increase in DHF cases necessitates clustering provinces based on their vulnerability to design effective mitigation strategies. This study com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfidha Rahmah, Nida Faoziatun Khusna, Safril Ahmadi Sanmas, Syifa Aulia, Shinta Amaria, Fatkhurokhman Fauzi
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto 2025-08-01
Series:Jurnal Informatika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/JUITA/article/view/26131
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849335802310426624
author Alfidha Rahmah
Nida Faoziatun Khusna
Safril Ahmadi Sanmas
Syifa Aulia
Shinta Amaria
Fatkhurokhman Fauzi
author_facet Alfidha Rahmah
Nida Faoziatun Khusna
Safril Ahmadi Sanmas
Syifa Aulia
Shinta Amaria
Fatkhurokhman Fauzi
author_sort Alfidha Rahmah
collection DOAJ
description Indonesia, a tropical country, experiences climate variations that influence the spread of infectious diseases, including Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF). The increase in DHF cases necessitates clustering provinces based on their vulnerability to design effective mitigation strategies. This study compares two clustering methods: Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Clustering. Within the hierarchical clustering analysis, five linkage methods were evaluated: Average Linkage, Complete Linkage, Single Linkage, Ward’s Method, and Centroid Linkage. The best linkage method was identified using the cophenetic correlation coefficient, indicating that Average Linkage produced the most representative cluster structure, resulting in three distinct groups. For the K-Means method, the optimal number of clusters was determined using the Silhouette Coefficient, which also indicated three clusters. Clustering performance evaluation revealed that Average Linkage outperformed K-Means, with a higher Silhouette Score of 0.552. The resulting clusters categorized provinces into three risk groups: high-risk areas (e.g., DKI Jakarta), moderate-risk areas (e.g., West Java and East Java), and low-risk areas, comprising the remaining provinces in Indonesia
format Article
id doaj-art-eaa75081890c463bad09752f2cb1bdb4
institution Kabale University
issn 2086-9398
2579-8901
language Indonesian
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
record_format Article
series Jurnal Informatika
spelling doaj-art-eaa75081890c463bad09752f2cb1bdb42025-08-20T03:45:10ZindUniversitas Muhammadiyah PurwokertoJurnal Informatika2086-93982579-89012025-08-0119920710.30595/juita.v13i2.2613121134Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) CasesAlfidha Rahmah0Nida Faoziatun Khusna1Safril Ahmadi Sanmas2Syifa Aulia3Shinta Amaria4Fatkhurokhman Fauzi5Universitas Muhammadiyah SemarangUniversitas Muhammadiyah SemarangUniversitas Muhammadiyah SemarangUniversitas Muhammdiyah SemarangUniversitas Muhammadiyah SemarangUniversitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia, a tropical country, experiences climate variations that influence the spread of infectious diseases, including Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF). The increase in DHF cases necessitates clustering provinces based on their vulnerability to design effective mitigation strategies. This study compares two clustering methods: Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Clustering. Within the hierarchical clustering analysis, five linkage methods were evaluated: Average Linkage, Complete Linkage, Single Linkage, Ward’s Method, and Centroid Linkage. The best linkage method was identified using the cophenetic correlation coefficient, indicating that Average Linkage produced the most representative cluster structure, resulting in three distinct groups. For the K-Means method, the optimal number of clusters was determined using the Silhouette Coefficient, which also indicated three clusters. Clustering performance evaluation revealed that Average Linkage outperformed K-Means, with a higher Silhouette Score of 0.552. The resulting clusters categorized provinces into three risk groups: high-risk areas (e.g., DKI Jakarta), moderate-risk areas (e.g., West Java and East Java), and low-risk areas, comprising the remaining provinces in Indonesiahttp://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/JUITA/article/view/26131clusteringdhfhierarchical clusteringk-means
spellingShingle Alfidha Rahmah
Nida Faoziatun Khusna
Safril Ahmadi Sanmas
Syifa Aulia
Shinta Amaria
Fatkhurokhman Fauzi
Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases
Jurnal Informatika
clustering
dhf
hierarchical clustering
k-means
title Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases
title_full Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases
title_fullStr Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases
title_short Comparison Analysis of Hierarchical Clustering and K-Means Methods in Grouping Provinces in Indonesia Based on Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) Cases
title_sort comparison analysis of hierarchical clustering and k means methods in grouping provinces in indonesia based on dengue hemorrhagic fever dhf cases
topic clustering
dhf
hierarchical clustering
k-means
url http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/JUITA/article/view/26131
work_keys_str_mv AT alfidharahmah comparisonanalysisofhierarchicalclusteringandkmeansmethodsingroupingprovincesinindonesiabasedondenguehemorrhagicfeverdhfcases
AT nidafaoziatunkhusna comparisonanalysisofhierarchicalclusteringandkmeansmethodsingroupingprovincesinindonesiabasedondenguehemorrhagicfeverdhfcases
AT safrilahmadisanmas comparisonanalysisofhierarchicalclusteringandkmeansmethodsingroupingprovincesinindonesiabasedondenguehemorrhagicfeverdhfcases
AT syifaaulia comparisonanalysisofhierarchicalclusteringandkmeansmethodsingroupingprovincesinindonesiabasedondenguehemorrhagicfeverdhfcases
AT shintaamaria comparisonanalysisofhierarchicalclusteringandkmeansmethodsingroupingprovincesinindonesiabasedondenguehemorrhagicfeverdhfcases
AT fatkhurokhmanfauzi comparisonanalysisofhierarchicalclusteringandkmeansmethodsingroupingprovincesinindonesiabasedondenguehemorrhagicfeverdhfcases