Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China

Abstract Factors influencing environmental legislation have long attracted scholarly attention, yet existing research tends to focus on laws regulating market actors while relatively neglecting legislation that oversees government regulators and enforcement agencies. This study addresses this gap by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taotao Qiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2025-06-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05127-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850223950430208000
author Taotao Qiu
author_facet Taotao Qiu
author_sort Taotao Qiu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Factors influencing environmental legislation have long attracted scholarly attention, yet existing research tends to focus on laws regulating market actors while relatively neglecting legislation that oversees government regulators and enforcement agencies. This study addresses this gap by uncovering the complex configurations of political, institutional, economic, and social drivers behind local environmental inspection legislation in China. Drawing on stakeholder theory and configurational policymaking perspectives, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was applied to data from all 31 provincial-level regions in mainland China, with five conditions—central political pressure, legislative stock for supervising administrative enforcement, secondary-sector economic share, allocation of enforcement resources, and public demand for environmental quality—calibrated into fuzzy-set scores. The analysis identifies three distinct pathways to robust local inspection laws: Industry-Driven Legislation under Low Central Pressure, Institutional Inertia-Driven Legislation, and Political Pressure-Driven Legislation. These results demonstrate that no single factor is sufficient on its own; instead, conjunctural combinations shape legislative outcomes. Higher-level accountability mechanisms and preexisting legal frameworks emerge as pivotal forces, while under certain configurations, local economic structures, public demand, and resource availability further influence enactment. These findings imply that legislation governing the supervision of environmental enforcement is shaped by multiple extra-legal factors, and that promoting the rule of law in environmental inspections requires moving beyond normative assertions to undertake in-depth consideration of higher-level political pressures, existing legislative stocks, and socio-economic development dynamics.
format Article
id doaj-art-ea8009ef92024ac58ed2bc7efa2573ae
institution OA Journals
issn 2662-9992
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj-art-ea8009ef92024ac58ed2bc7efa2573ae2025-08-20T02:05:47ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922025-06-0112111710.1057/s41599-025-05127-wFactors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from ChinaTaotao Qiu0 Department of Public Management, Zhejiang Institute of AdministrationAbstract Factors influencing environmental legislation have long attracted scholarly attention, yet existing research tends to focus on laws regulating market actors while relatively neglecting legislation that oversees government regulators and enforcement agencies. This study addresses this gap by uncovering the complex configurations of political, institutional, economic, and social drivers behind local environmental inspection legislation in China. Drawing on stakeholder theory and configurational policymaking perspectives, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was applied to data from all 31 provincial-level regions in mainland China, with five conditions—central political pressure, legislative stock for supervising administrative enforcement, secondary-sector economic share, allocation of enforcement resources, and public demand for environmental quality—calibrated into fuzzy-set scores. The analysis identifies three distinct pathways to robust local inspection laws: Industry-Driven Legislation under Low Central Pressure, Institutional Inertia-Driven Legislation, and Political Pressure-Driven Legislation. These results demonstrate that no single factor is sufficient on its own; instead, conjunctural combinations shape legislative outcomes. Higher-level accountability mechanisms and preexisting legal frameworks emerge as pivotal forces, while under certain configurations, local economic structures, public demand, and resource availability further influence enactment. These findings imply that legislation governing the supervision of environmental enforcement is shaped by multiple extra-legal factors, and that promoting the rule of law in environmental inspections requires moving beyond normative assertions to undertake in-depth consideration of higher-level political pressures, existing legislative stocks, and socio-economic development dynamics.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05127-w
spellingShingle Taotao Qiu
Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China
title_full Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China
title_fullStr Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China
title_short Factors influencing environmental inspection legislation: evidence from China
title_sort factors influencing environmental inspection legislation evidence from china
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05127-w
work_keys_str_mv AT taotaoqiu factorsinfluencingenvironmentalinspectionlegislationevidencefromchina