Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence

The objective of this paper is to examine the simultaneous relationship between fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development using the panel data of 18 countries over the 2011–2017 period. 3SLS-GMM (Three Stage Least Squares—Generalized Method of Moments Estimator) and GMM-HAC (Ge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nguyen Thanh Hung, Su Dinh Thanh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Cogent Economics & Finance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23322039.2022.2109279
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849717196514656256
author Nguyen Thanh Hung
Su Dinh Thanh
author_facet Nguyen Thanh Hung
Su Dinh Thanh
author_sort Nguyen Thanh Hung
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this paper is to examine the simultaneous relationship between fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development using the panel data of 18 countries over the 2011–2017 period. 3SLS-GMM (Three Stage Least Squares—Generalized Method of Moments Estimator) and GMM-HAC (Generalized Method of Moments—Heteroskedastic and Autocorrelation Consistent estimator) are employed to obtain unbiased coefficients in the system of equation. The results indicate that the significant relationship does exist between fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development from different directions. Specifically, economic growth and human development are positively and negatively affected by fiscal decentralization, respectively. These results hold true with alternative estimation methods and sub-indexes of decentralization. Interestingly, economic growth is fostered by human development index, as justified by the statistical evidence of the studied sample, but these results are found to be consistent as well when it comes to expenditure-based decentralization. However, in the opposite direction, the impact of human development on economic growth is ambiguous and only remains significant in the case of expenditure decentralization purposefully utilized as an explanatory variable. Thirdly, economic growth does not give rise to the efficiency of fiscal decentralization, yet could reduce human development instead. The results provide several plausible implications to policy makers.
format Article
id doaj-art-ea60ac36557d4f12879edeeed3e2af6c
institution DOAJ
issn 2332-2039
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Economics & Finance
spelling doaj-art-ea60ac36557d4f12879edeeed3e2af6c2025-08-20T03:12:43ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392022-12-0110110.1080/23322039.2022.2109279Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidenceNguyen Thanh Hung0Su Dinh Thanh1School of Public Finance, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamSchool of Public Finance, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamThe objective of this paper is to examine the simultaneous relationship between fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development using the panel data of 18 countries over the 2011–2017 period. 3SLS-GMM (Three Stage Least Squares—Generalized Method of Moments Estimator) and GMM-HAC (Generalized Method of Moments—Heteroskedastic and Autocorrelation Consistent estimator) are employed to obtain unbiased coefficients in the system of equation. The results indicate that the significant relationship does exist between fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development from different directions. Specifically, economic growth and human development are positively and negatively affected by fiscal decentralization, respectively. These results hold true with alternative estimation methods and sub-indexes of decentralization. Interestingly, economic growth is fostered by human development index, as justified by the statistical evidence of the studied sample, but these results are found to be consistent as well when it comes to expenditure-based decentralization. However, in the opposite direction, the impact of human development on economic growth is ambiguous and only remains significant in the case of expenditure decentralization purposefully utilized as an explanatory variable. Thirdly, economic growth does not give rise to the efficiency of fiscal decentralization, yet could reduce human development instead. The results provide several plausible implications to policy makers.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23322039.2022.2109279Fiscal decentralizationincome inequalityeconomic growthGMM-HAC3SLS-GMM
spellingShingle Nguyen Thanh Hung
Su Dinh Thanh
Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence
Cogent Economics & Finance
Fiscal decentralization
income inequality
economic growth
GMM-HAC
3SLS-GMM
title Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence
title_full Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence
title_fullStr Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence
title_full_unstemmed Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence
title_short Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence
title_sort fiscal decentralization economic growth and human development empirical evidence
topic Fiscal decentralization
income inequality
economic growth
GMM-HAC
3SLS-GMM
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23322039.2022.2109279
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenthanhhung fiscaldecentralizationeconomicgrowthandhumandevelopmentempiricalevidence
AT sudinhthanh fiscaldecentralizationeconomicgrowthandhumandevelopmentempiricalevidence