Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act

By introducing the concept of high-reach AI, this paper focuses on AI systems whose widespread use may generate significant risks for both individuals and societies. While some of those risks have been recognised under the AI Act, we analyse the rules laid down by the Digital Services Act (DSA) for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kasia Söderlund, Emma Engström, Kashyap Haresamudram, Stefan Larsson, Pontus Strimling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2024-03-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/1746
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850074039313235968
author Kasia Söderlund
Emma Engström
Kashyap Haresamudram
Stefan Larsson
Pontus Strimling
author_facet Kasia Söderlund
Emma Engström
Kashyap Haresamudram
Stefan Larsson
Pontus Strimling
author_sort Kasia Söderlund
collection DOAJ
description By introducing the concept of high-reach AI, this paper focuses on AI systems whose widespread use may generate significant risks for both individuals and societies. While some of those risks have been recognised under the AI Act, we analyse the rules laid down by the Digital Services Act (DSA) for recommender systems used by dominant social media platforms as a prominent example of high-reach AI. Specifically, we examine transparency provisions aimed at addressing adverse effects of these AI technologies employed by social media very large online platforms (VLOPs). Drawing from AI transparency literature, we analyse DSA transparency measures through the conceptual lens of horizontal and vertical transparency. Our analysis indicates that while the DSA incorporates transparency provisions in both dimensions, the most progressive amendments emerge within the vertical transparency, for instance, by the introduction of the systemic risk assessment mechanism. However, we argue that the true impact of the new transparency provisions extends beyond their mere existence, emphasising the critical role of oversight entities in implementation and application of the DSA. Overall, this study highlights the paramount importance of vertical transparency in providing a comprehensive understanding of the aggregated risks associated with high-reach AI technologies, exemplified by social media recommender systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-ea5fb1f961b94d8bb300bb02e3df9ee5
institution DOAJ
issn 2197-6775
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
record_format Article
series Internet Policy Review
spelling doaj-art-ea5fb1f961b94d8bb300bb02e3df9ee52025-08-20T02:46:39ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752024-03-0113110.14763/2024.1.1746Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services ActKasia Söderlund0Emma Engström1Kashyap Haresamudram2Stefan Larsson3Pontus Strimling4Lund UniversityInstitute for Futures StudiesLund UniversityLund UniversityInstitute for Futures StudiesBy introducing the concept of high-reach AI, this paper focuses on AI systems whose widespread use may generate significant risks for both individuals and societies. While some of those risks have been recognised under the AI Act, we analyse the rules laid down by the Digital Services Act (DSA) for recommender systems used by dominant social media platforms as a prominent example of high-reach AI. Specifically, we examine transparency provisions aimed at addressing adverse effects of these AI technologies employed by social media very large online platforms (VLOPs). Drawing from AI transparency literature, we analyse DSA transparency measures through the conceptual lens of horizontal and vertical transparency. Our analysis indicates that while the DSA incorporates transparency provisions in both dimensions, the most progressive amendments emerge within the vertical transparency, for instance, by the introduction of the systemic risk assessment mechanism. However, we argue that the true impact of the new transparency provisions extends beyond their mere existence, emphasising the critical role of oversight entities in implementation and application of the DSA. Overall, this study highlights the paramount importance of vertical transparency in providing a comprehensive understanding of the aggregated risks associated with high-reach AI technologies, exemplified by social media recommender systems.https://policyreview.info/node/1746Digital Services Act (DSA)Social mediaAI transparencyContent recommender systemsArtificial intelligence
spellingShingle Kasia Söderlund
Emma Engström
Kashyap Haresamudram
Stefan Larsson
Pontus Strimling
Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
Internet Policy Review
Digital Services Act (DSA)
Social media
AI transparency
Content recommender systems
Artificial intelligence
title Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
title_full Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
title_fullStr Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
title_full_unstemmed Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
title_short Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act
title_sort regulating high reach ai on transparency directions in the digital services act
topic Digital Services Act (DSA)
Social media
AI transparency
Content recommender systems
Artificial intelligence
url https://policyreview.info/node/1746
work_keys_str_mv AT kasiasoderlund regulatinghighreachaiontransparencydirectionsinthedigitalservicesact
AT emmaengstrom regulatinghighreachaiontransparencydirectionsinthedigitalservicesact
AT kashyapharesamudram regulatinghighreachaiontransparencydirectionsinthedigitalservicesact
AT stefanlarsson regulatinghighreachaiontransparencydirectionsinthedigitalservicesact
AT pontusstrimling regulatinghighreachaiontransparencydirectionsinthedigitalservicesact