Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development.
Emotional disorders are common in childhood, and their prevalence sharply increases during adolescence. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used for screening emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and young people, but little is known about the accuracy of the e...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288882&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849469828236050432 |
|---|---|
| author | Jessica May Armitage Foteini Tseliou Lucy Riglin Charlotte Dennison Olga Eyre Rhys Bevan Jones Frances Rice Ajay K Thapar Anita Thapar Stephan Collishaw |
| author_facet | Jessica May Armitage Foteini Tseliou Lucy Riglin Charlotte Dennison Olga Eyre Rhys Bevan Jones Frances Rice Ajay K Thapar Anita Thapar Stephan Collishaw |
| author_sort | Jessica May Armitage |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Emotional disorders are common in childhood, and their prevalence sharply increases during adolescence. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used for screening emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and young people, but little is known about the accuracy of the emotional subscale (SDQ-E) in detecting emotional disorders, and whether this changes over development. Such knowledge is important in determining whether symptom changes across age are due to developmental or measurement differences. This study assessed the validity of the SDQ-E and two individual items (low mood and general worry) in differentiating between cases and non-cases of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and other anxiety disorders across ages 7, 10, 13, 15, and 25 years in a UK population cohort. Analyses showed moderate accuracy of the subscale in discriminating cases of MDD (AUC = 0.67-0.85), and high accuracy for discriminating cases of GAD (AUC = 0.80-0.93) and any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.74-0.83) compared to non-cases. The SDQ-E performed well across ages and sex, and generally performed better than the two individual items. Together our findings validate the SDQ-E as a screen for emotional disorders during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood, and as a tool for longitudinal research on depression and anxiety disorders. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ea132a799105442b8a573bd15bb47d69 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-ea132a799105442b8a573bd15bb47d692025-08-20T03:25:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01187e028888210.1371/journal.pone.0288882Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development.Jessica May ArmitageFoteini TseliouLucy RiglinCharlotte DennisonOlga EyreRhys Bevan JonesFrances RiceAjay K ThaparAnita ThaparStephan CollishawEmotional disorders are common in childhood, and their prevalence sharply increases during adolescence. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used for screening emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and young people, but little is known about the accuracy of the emotional subscale (SDQ-E) in detecting emotional disorders, and whether this changes over development. Such knowledge is important in determining whether symptom changes across age are due to developmental or measurement differences. This study assessed the validity of the SDQ-E and two individual items (low mood and general worry) in differentiating between cases and non-cases of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and other anxiety disorders across ages 7, 10, 13, 15, and 25 years in a UK population cohort. Analyses showed moderate accuracy of the subscale in discriminating cases of MDD (AUC = 0.67-0.85), and high accuracy for discriminating cases of GAD (AUC = 0.80-0.93) and any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.74-0.83) compared to non-cases. The SDQ-E performed well across ages and sex, and generally performed better than the two individual items. Together our findings validate the SDQ-E as a screen for emotional disorders during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood, and as a tool for longitudinal research on depression and anxiety disorders.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288882&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Jessica May Armitage Foteini Tseliou Lucy Riglin Charlotte Dennison Olga Eyre Rhys Bevan Jones Frances Rice Ajay K Thapar Anita Thapar Stephan Collishaw Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development. PLoS ONE |
| title | Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development. |
| title_full | Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development. |
| title_fullStr | Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development. |
| title_short | Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development. |
| title_sort | validation of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire sdq emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288882&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jessicamayarmitage validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT foteinitseliou validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT lucyriglin validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT charlottedennison validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT olgaeyre validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT rhysbevanjones validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT francesrice validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT ajaykthapar validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT anitathapar validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment AT stephancollishaw validationofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqemotionalsubscaleinassessingdepressionandanxietyacrossdevelopment |