Working with public contributors in Parkinson's research: What were the changes, benefits and learnings? A critical reflection from the researcher and public contributor perspective
Abstract Introduction This paper provides a critical reflection from both the researcher and public contributor (PC) perspective on the benefits and the learnings taken from involving PCs in research related to Parkinson's. Approach to Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) This paper reports on...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Fiona E. Lithander, Emma Tenison, David Ashford Jones, Sue Stocker, Noreen Hopewell‐Kelly, Andy Gibson, Carmel McGrath |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Health Expectations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13914 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Acceptability, Safety and Impact of a Play Co‐Developed With Public Contributors as a Format for Disseminating Research on a Sensitive Subject
by: Cat Papastavrou Brooks, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study
by: Eugenie Evelynne Johnson, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Benefits of patient and public involvement in cancer research: literature review
by: Cátia Teixeira, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Diversity in patient and public involvement in healthcare research and education—Realising the potential
by: Sarah Hatch, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Consumer and community involvement: implementation research for impact (CCIRI) – implementing evidence-based patient and public involvement across health and medical research in Australia – a mixed methods protocol
by: Ashley H. Ng, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)