Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent

<p class="normal">Diversity-environment relationships are distinct across species pools, and as a result species from different biogeographic pools have different environmental preferences. Regional communities are drawn from available biogeographic pools, subject to environmental an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krishnapriya Tamma, Aniruddha Marathe, Uma Ramakrishnan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2016-04-01
Series:Frontiers of Biogeography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/57k695c3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850163556106895360
author Krishnapriya Tamma
Aniruddha Marathe
Uma Ramakrishnan
author_facet Krishnapriya Tamma
Aniruddha Marathe
Uma Ramakrishnan
author_sort Krishnapriya Tamma
collection DOAJ
description <p class="normal">Diversity-environment relationships are distinct across species pools, and as a result species from different biogeographic pools have different environmental preferences. Regional communities are drawn from available biogeographic pools, subject to environmental and dispersal constraints. Does shared biogeographic history of taxa lead to similar relationships with the environment? We test this idea in the Indian subcontinent, which is at the confluence of multiple biogeographic regions resulting in species from multiple biogeographic pools being distributed here. Species were classified as belonging to four biogeographic affinities based on their geographic distributions: eastern, northern, western and endemic. We investigated spatial patterns of species richness for all mammals (over 1<strong>°</strong> x 1<strong>°</strong> grid cells), for each biogeographic group and for 5 major mammalian orders. Generalized Additive Models (GAM) were used to investigate environment-diversity relationship for all mammals, each biogeographic group, and for major mammalian orders in the Indian subcontinent. Species richness of all mammals was found to be highest in the montane regions of the Eastern Himalayas and the Western Ghats. Species richness of each biogeographic group was highest at the border it shared with Asia, in the direction of immigration from Asia. Environment and spatial variables were both correlated with species richness in the Indian subcontinent and each biogeographic group showed a distinct richness-environment relationship. Additionally, biogeographic groups sorted along environmental space, in keeping with our predictions based on their global distributions. Finally, analyses across mammalian orders had low predictive value, suggesting that shared phylogenetic history is relatively less important than biogeographic ancestry in determining relationships to environment. We conclude that historical factors such as immigration and the distinct evolutionary histories of species impact species richness patterns in the Indian subcontinent. Our results provide insights into drivers of regional community assembly in transition zones where multiple biogeographic species pools co-exist.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-e96d874a1fc94392bf570d7d33b674be
institution OA Journals
issn 1948-6596
language English
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series Frontiers of Biogeography
spelling doaj-art-e96d874a1fc94392bf570d7d33b674be2025-08-20T02:22:15ZengPensoft PublishersFrontiers of Biogeography1948-65962016-04-0181ark:13030/qt57k695c3Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinentKrishnapriya Tamma0Aniruddha Marathe1Uma Ramakrishnan2National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR BangaloreAshoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment, Royal Enclave Sriramapura, Jakkur Post, Bangalore 560064, India.Ecology and Evolution group, National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, GKVK Campus, Bangalore 560065, India.<p class="normal">Diversity-environment relationships are distinct across species pools, and as a result species from different biogeographic pools have different environmental preferences. Regional communities are drawn from available biogeographic pools, subject to environmental and dispersal constraints. Does shared biogeographic history of taxa lead to similar relationships with the environment? We test this idea in the Indian subcontinent, which is at the confluence of multiple biogeographic regions resulting in species from multiple biogeographic pools being distributed here. Species were classified as belonging to four biogeographic affinities based on their geographic distributions: eastern, northern, western and endemic. We investigated spatial patterns of species richness for all mammals (over 1<strong>°</strong> x 1<strong>°</strong> grid cells), for each biogeographic group and for 5 major mammalian orders. Generalized Additive Models (GAM) were used to investigate environment-diversity relationship for all mammals, each biogeographic group, and for major mammalian orders in the Indian subcontinent. Species richness of all mammals was found to be highest in the montane regions of the Eastern Himalayas and the Western Ghats. Species richness of each biogeographic group was highest at the border it shared with Asia, in the direction of immigration from Asia. Environment and spatial variables were both correlated with species richness in the Indian subcontinent and each biogeographic group showed a distinct richness-environment relationship. Additionally, biogeographic groups sorted along environmental space, in keeping with our predictions based on their global distributions. Finally, analyses across mammalian orders had low predictive value, suggesting that shared phylogenetic history is relatively less important than biogeographic ancestry in determining relationships to environment. We conclude that historical factors such as immigration and the distinct evolutionary histories of species impact species richness patterns in the Indian subcontinent. Our results provide insights into drivers of regional community assembly in transition zones where multiple biogeographic species pools co-exist.</p>http://escholarship.org/uc/item/57k695c3Indian subcontinent, biogeographic species pools, mammals, endemics, biogeography, Himalayas.
spellingShingle Krishnapriya Tamma
Aniruddha Marathe
Uma Ramakrishnan
Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent
Frontiers of Biogeography
Indian subcontinent, biogeographic species pools, mammals, endemics, biogeography, Himalayas.
title Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent
title_full Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent
title_fullStr Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent
title_full_unstemmed Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent
title_short Past influences present: Mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the Indian subcontinent
title_sort past influences present mammalian species from different biogeographic pools sort environmentally in the indian subcontinent
topic Indian subcontinent, biogeographic species pools, mammals, endemics, biogeography, Himalayas.
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/57k695c3
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnapriyatamma pastinfluencespresentmammalianspeciesfromdifferentbiogeographicpoolssortenvironmentallyintheindiansubcontinent
AT aniruddhamarathe pastinfluencespresentmammalianspeciesfromdifferentbiogeographicpoolssortenvironmentallyintheindiansubcontinent
AT umaramakrishnan pastinfluencespresentmammalianspeciesfromdifferentbiogeographicpoolssortenvironmentallyintheindiansubcontinent