Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions
This article aims to present methodological discussions about the research on the History of Psychology. Here it is used as a guiding axis in the comprehension of history, methodological and theoretical perspectives of the New History. In its critical to the traditional history, the New History prop...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica – IPOPS
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | Interacciones |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.24016/2016.v2n2.39 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832572166560808960 |
|---|---|
| author | Ana Maria Jacó-Vilela Adriana Amaral do Espírito-Santo Filipe Degani-Carneiro Lidiane de Oliveira Goes Maira Allucham Goulart Naves Trevisan Vasconcellos |
| author_facet | Ana Maria Jacó-Vilela Adriana Amaral do Espírito-Santo Filipe Degani-Carneiro Lidiane de Oliveira Goes Maira Allucham Goulart Naves Trevisan Vasconcellos |
| author_sort | Ana Maria Jacó-Vilela |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article aims to present methodological discussions about the research on the History of Psychology. Here it is used as a guiding axis in the comprehension of history, methodological and theoretical perspectives of the New History. In its critical to the traditional history, the New History proposes the analysis of the conditions of construction of the narratives about the facts. One of its consequences was the expansion of the historical document field, with the utilization of other sources, different than official texts. In the History of Psychology, that expansion meant the concern about the scientific type of historical researches and the considerations about the ways of thinking and making Psychology, considering the context and the voices of those who helped to build it as knowledge and professional practice. In the case of Brazil, different initiatives and laboratories have reaffirmed the importance of the debate about the systematic organization and the careful analysis of the research material. Some examples are referred here, so as to demonstrate this kind of proposal. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e94a33e76e0f4bc187c977ed584c206e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2411-5940 2413-4465 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
| publisher | Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica – IPOPS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Interacciones |
| spelling | doaj-art-e94a33e76e0f4bc187c977ed584c206e2025-02-02T11:50:32ZengInstituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica – IPOPSInteracciones2411-59402413-44652016-12-012212313410.24016/2016.v2n2.39Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributionsAna Maria Jacó-Vilela0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-8700Adriana Amaral do Espírito-SantoFilipe Degani-Carneirohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6643-8425Lidiane de Oliveira GoesMaira Allucham Goulart Naves Trevisan VasconcellosLaboratório de História e Memória da Psicologia – Clio-PsychéUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroThis article aims to present methodological discussions about the research on the History of Psychology. Here it is used as a guiding axis in the comprehension of history, methodological and theoretical perspectives of the New History. In its critical to the traditional history, the New History proposes the analysis of the conditions of construction of the narratives about the facts. One of its consequences was the expansion of the historical document field, with the utilization of other sources, different than official texts. In the History of Psychology, that expansion meant the concern about the scientific type of historical researches and the considerations about the ways of thinking and making Psychology, considering the context and the voices of those who helped to build it as knowledge and professional practice. In the case of Brazil, different initiatives and laboratories have reaffirmed the importance of the debate about the systematic organization and the careful analysis of the research material. Some examples are referred here, so as to demonstrate this kind of proposal.http://dx.doi.org/10.24016/2016.v2n2.39history of psychologymemorymethodologysources of researchnew history |
| spellingShingle | Ana Maria Jacó-Vilela Adriana Amaral do Espírito-Santo Filipe Degani-Carneiro Lidiane de Oliveira Goes Maira Allucham Goulart Naves Trevisan Vasconcellos Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions Interacciones history of psychology memory methodology sources of research new history |
| title | Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions |
| title_full | Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions |
| title_fullStr | Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions |
| title_short | Investigating the history of psychology: methodological contributions |
| title_sort | investigating the history of psychology methodological contributions |
| topic | history of psychology memory methodology sources of research new history |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.24016/2016.v2n2.39 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anamariajacovilela investigatingthehistoryofpsychologymethodologicalcontributions AT adrianaamaraldoespiritosanto investigatingthehistoryofpsychologymethodologicalcontributions AT filipedeganicarneiro investigatingthehistoryofpsychologymethodologicalcontributions AT lidianedeoliveiragoes investigatingthehistoryofpsychologymethodologicalcontributions AT mairaalluchamgoulartnavestrevisanvasconcellos investigatingthehistoryofpsychologymethodologicalcontributions |