Adjunct Therapy with Ipragliflozin Exerts Limited Effects on Kidney Protection in Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Conducted at 25 Centers in Japan (IPRA-CKD)

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: While sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated additional non-glycemic benefits for renal protection in individuals with type 2 diabetes, less evidence is available for those with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To determine whether the adj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuta Nakamura, Ichiro Horie, Hiroshi Yano, Hiroshi Nomoto, Tomoyasu Fukui, Yoshihiko Yuyama, Tomoyuki Kawamura, Mariko Ueda, Akane Yamamoto, Yushi Hirota, Yoshiki Kusunoki, Kenro Nishida, Dan Sekiguchi, Yasutaka Maeda, Masae Minami, Ayako Nagayama, Shimpei Iwata, Hitomi Minagawa, Shinya Furukawa, Teruki Miyake, Hiroaki Ueno, Rei Chinen, Yoshiro Nakayama, Hiroaki Masuzaki, Yasutaka Miyachi, Yosuke Okada, Mitsuhiro Okamoto, Kaoru Ono, Ken-ichi Tanaka, Akira Kurozumi, Takenori Sakai, Hironori Yamasaki, Jun-ichi Yasui, Ayako Ito, Atsushi Kawakami, Norio Abiru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Biomedicines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/6/1287
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background/Objectives</b>: While sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated additional non-glycemic benefits for renal protection in individuals with type 2 diabetes, less evidence is available for those with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To determine whether the adjunctive use of the SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin confers kidney protection in individuals with T1D, we retrospectively analyzed data from a real-world cohort examined at 25 centers in Japan. <b>Methods</b>: We enrolled 359 subjects aged 20–74 years with T1D (IPRA group: 159 ipragliflozin users; control [CTRL] group: 200 non-users). The primary outcome was changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline to 24 months after the initiation of ipragliflozin. The secondary outcomes were all other changes, including the urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) and urinary protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR). <b>Results</b>: The IPRA group’s eGFR decline slopes were 0.79 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>/year milder than the CTRL group’s after propensity score matching, but this difference was not significant. The subjects complicated by chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as UACR ≥ 30 mg/g and/or UPCR ≥ 0.5 g/g and/or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> showed changes in UPCR (g/g) from baseline to 24 months that were significantly lower in the IPRA group (−0.27 ± 1.63) versus the CTRL group (0.18 ± 0.36) (<i>p</i> = 0.016). No significant increase in adverse events (including severe hypoglycemia and hospitalization due to ketosis/ketoacidosis or cardiovascular diseases) was observed in the IPRA group. <b>Conclusions</b>: Adjunctive treatment with ipragliflozin exerted potential renal benefits by decreasing proteinuria in T1D subjects with CKD. Further investigations are required to determine whether its additional benefits exceed the increased risk of ketoacidosis.
ISSN:2227-9059