Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving

At Østfold University College, we have focused on interdisciplinary collaboration to provide a comprehensive introduction to academic writing for first-year students, emphasizing a standardized program to ensure consistency in instruction. The article is divided into two studies. Both studies aimed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne-Lise Eng, Stine Torp Løkkeberg, Lars Rune Halvorsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bergen 2025-05-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://noril.uib.no/article/view/4227
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850150479715106816
author Anne-Lise Eng
Stine Torp Løkkeberg
Lars Rune Halvorsen
author_facet Anne-Lise Eng
Stine Torp Løkkeberg
Lars Rune Halvorsen
author_sort Anne-Lise Eng
collection DOAJ
description At Østfold University College, we have focused on interdisciplinary collaboration to provide a comprehensive introduction to academic writing for first-year students, emphasizing a standardized program to ensure consistency in instruction. The article is divided into two studies. Both studies aimed to improve first-year students' academic writing skills by evaluating different instructional methods. The research questions for the studies were as follows: Study 1: Can the use of pre- and post-tests in an e-learning course in academic writing help students acquire new knowledge?  Study 2: How do students experience blended teaching in academic writing? Study 1 examined whether pre- and post-tests in an e-learning course could help students acquire new knowledge in academic writing. An e-learning package was developed around eight themes: problem statement, text writing, sources, source criticism, study techniques, referencing techniques, plagiarism, and ethics. Forty-four first-year students took a pre-test of fifteen questions and received immediate feedback. After completing the instructional components for each theme, they took a post-test. Results showed significant improvement in post-tests, indicating increased understanding of the themes. Study 2 aimed to establish a quality-assured course package combining e-learning with on-campus instruction. A Facebook group was also created for students to ask questions about academic writing. Fifty-eight first-year students completed a questionnaire containing twelve different questions related to the evaluation of the various teaching methods in the blended instruction. In study 2, the evaluation of the academic writing course revealed that all three teaching methods were perceived as important for learning.
format Article
id doaj-art-e9144061a95d4d0c94fa3608b4dc6fa1
institution OA Journals
issn 1890-5900
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher University of Bergen
record_format Article
series Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education
spelling doaj-art-e9144061a95d4d0c94fa3608b4dc6fa12025-08-20T02:26:32ZengUniversity of BergenNordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education1890-59002025-05-0114110.15845/noril.v14i1.4227Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skrivingAnne-Lise Eng0Stine Torp LøkkebergLars Rune Halvorsen Høgskolen i ØstfoldAt Østfold University College, we have focused on interdisciplinary collaboration to provide a comprehensive introduction to academic writing for first-year students, emphasizing a standardized program to ensure consistency in instruction. The article is divided into two studies. Both studies aimed to improve first-year students' academic writing skills by evaluating different instructional methods. The research questions for the studies were as follows: Study 1: Can the use of pre- and post-tests in an e-learning course in academic writing help students acquire new knowledge?  Study 2: How do students experience blended teaching in academic writing? Study 1 examined whether pre- and post-tests in an e-learning course could help students acquire new knowledge in academic writing. An e-learning package was developed around eight themes: problem statement, text writing, sources, source criticism, study techniques, referencing techniques, plagiarism, and ethics. Forty-four first-year students took a pre-test of fifteen questions and received immediate feedback. After completing the instructional components for each theme, they took a post-test. Results showed significant improvement in post-tests, indicating increased understanding of the themes. Study 2 aimed to establish a quality-assured course package combining e-learning with on-campus instruction. A Facebook group was also created for students to ask questions about academic writing. Fifty-eight first-year students completed a questionnaire containing twelve different questions related to the evaluation of the various teaching methods in the blended instruction. In study 2, the evaluation of the academic writing course revealed that all three teaching methods were perceived as important for learning. https://noril.uib.no/article/view/4227academic writingfirst-year studentspre- and post-testsblended learninge-learningtraditional learning
spellingShingle Anne-Lise Eng
Stine Torp Løkkeberg
Lars Rune Halvorsen
Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education
academic writing
first-year students
pre- and post-tests
blended learning
e-learning
traditional learning
title Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
title_full Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
title_fullStr Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
title_full_unstemmed Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
title_short Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
title_sort evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving
topic academic writing
first-year students
pre- and post-tests
blended learning
e-learning
traditional learning
url https://noril.uib.no/article/view/4227
work_keys_str_mv AT anneliseeng evalueringavetpedagogiskundervisningsoppleggiakademiskskriving
AT stinetorpløkkeberg evalueringavetpedagogiskundervisningsoppleggiakademiskskriving
AT larsrunehalvorsen evalueringavetpedagogiskundervisningsoppleggiakademiskskriving