Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas

Transportation inequality poses significant challenges in car-dependent cities in the US, especially for Transit-Dependent Populations (TDPs) who rely on public transportation to meet their travel requirements. Research indicates that despite the rapid growth of ride-hailing services like Uber, TDPs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farokh Bagheri, Ali Soltani, Shima Hamidi, Parviz Azizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-09-01
Series:Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002239
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850282907225030656
author Farokh Bagheri
Ali Soltani
Shima Hamidi
Parviz Azizi
author_facet Farokh Bagheri
Ali Soltani
Shima Hamidi
Parviz Azizi
author_sort Farokh Bagheri
collection DOAJ
description Transportation inequality poses significant challenges in car-dependent cities in the US, especially for Transit-Dependent Populations (TDPs) who rely on public transportation to meet their travel requirements. Research indicates that despite the rapid growth of ride-hailing services like Uber, TDPs primarily depend on conventional transit options such as buses and metros. This study differentiates between two classifications of ride-hailing services: Private Ride-hailing (PRH), represented by platforms like Uber and Lyft, where individuals hire and pay for their rides, occasionally sharing the journey with guests; and ride-sharing (RS), like UberPool, which allows users to divide travel expenses. However, a more profound comprehension is necessary to clarify why TDPs show a preference for one mode of transportation over another and the factors that influence their decision-making. This study utilises Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to examine the direct and indirect relationships between explanatory and outcome variables, while investigating modal preferences and usage frequency in 48 densely populated urban areas in the US (N = 384). TDPs choose to use transportation services like Uber because of their effectiveness in reducing both travel and waiting time, in contrast to traditional Fixed-Route Transit Services (FRTS), which are relatively less efficient. TDPs’ inclination towards PRH leads to a greater dependence on ride-hailing services, whereas a preference for FRTS reduces this dependence. Significantly, the study demonstrates that TDPs’ modal preferences are not only influenced by their socioeconomic status or rational decision-making, but also by the complex interaction between these factors. These findings provide valuable information for policymakers who want to evaluate the sustainability of ride-hailing services for TDPs and effectively tackle transportation inequalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8fb11993de548fe8aaa24d79f5d82ed
institution OA Journals
issn 2590-1982
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
spelling doaj-art-e8fb11993de548fe8aaa24d79f5d82ed2025-08-20T01:47:51ZengElsevierTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives2590-19822024-09-012710123710.1016/j.trip.2024.101237Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized AreasFarokh Bagheri0Ali Soltani1Shima Hamidi2Parviz Azizi3College of Architecture Planning and Public Affairs, The University of Texas, Arlington, TX 76019, USA; Corresponding author.Healthy Communities, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, AustraliaCenter for Climate-Smart Transportation (CCST), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USADepartment of Architecture and Planning, University of Urmia, Urmia 5756151818, IranTransportation inequality poses significant challenges in car-dependent cities in the US, especially for Transit-Dependent Populations (TDPs) who rely on public transportation to meet their travel requirements. Research indicates that despite the rapid growth of ride-hailing services like Uber, TDPs primarily depend on conventional transit options such as buses and metros. This study differentiates between two classifications of ride-hailing services: Private Ride-hailing (PRH), represented by platforms like Uber and Lyft, where individuals hire and pay for their rides, occasionally sharing the journey with guests; and ride-sharing (RS), like UberPool, which allows users to divide travel expenses. However, a more profound comprehension is necessary to clarify why TDPs show a preference for one mode of transportation over another and the factors that influence their decision-making. This study utilises Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to examine the direct and indirect relationships between explanatory and outcome variables, while investigating modal preferences and usage frequency in 48 densely populated urban areas in the US (N = 384). TDPs choose to use transportation services like Uber because of their effectiveness in reducing both travel and waiting time, in contrast to traditional Fixed-Route Transit Services (FRTS), which are relatively less efficient. TDPs’ inclination towards PRH leads to a greater dependence on ride-hailing services, whereas a preference for FRTS reduces this dependence. Significantly, the study demonstrates that TDPs’ modal preferences are not only influenced by their socioeconomic status or rational decision-making, but also by the complex interaction between these factors. These findings provide valuable information for policymakers who want to evaluate the sustainability of ride-hailing services for TDPs and effectively tackle transportation inequalities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002239Ride-hailing Services (RHS)Fixed-route Transit Services (FRTS)Transit-Dependent Populations (TDPs)Modal preferencesModal choice
spellingShingle Farokh Bagheri
Ali Soltani
Shima Hamidi
Parviz Azizi
Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Ride-hailing Services (RHS)
Fixed-route Transit Services (FRTS)
Transit-Dependent Populations (TDPs)
Modal preferences
Modal choice
title Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas
title_full Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas
title_fullStr Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas
title_full_unstemmed Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas
title_short Ride-Hailing vs. Fixed-Route: Preferences of the Transit-Dependent Populations in U.S. Urbanized Areas
title_sort ride hailing vs fixed route preferences of the transit dependent populations in u s urbanized areas
topic Ride-hailing Services (RHS)
Fixed-route Transit Services (FRTS)
Transit-Dependent Populations (TDPs)
Modal preferences
Modal choice
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002239
work_keys_str_mv AT farokhbagheri ridehailingvsfixedroutepreferencesofthetransitdependentpopulationsinusurbanizedareas
AT alisoltani ridehailingvsfixedroutepreferencesofthetransitdependentpopulationsinusurbanizedareas
AT shimahamidi ridehailingvsfixedroutepreferencesofthetransitdependentpopulationsinusurbanizedareas
AT parvizazizi ridehailingvsfixedroutepreferencesofthetransitdependentpopulationsinusurbanizedareas