Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial
Abstract Background In critically ill patients, tracheal intubation may be required in the prehospital setting, where airway management presents unique technical and logistical challenges. While videolaryngoscopy has emerged as a potential alternative to direct laryngoscopy by providing a better and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Emergency Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01266-0 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849769463617945600 |
|---|---|
| author | Cédric Cibotto Mathieu Pasquier Nicolas Beysard Frédéric Rouyer Olivier Grosgurin Laurent Bourgeois Elio Erriquez Ely Braun Birgit Andrea Gartner Thibaut Desmettre Laurent Suppan |
| author_facet | Cédric Cibotto Mathieu Pasquier Nicolas Beysard Frédéric Rouyer Olivier Grosgurin Laurent Bourgeois Elio Erriquez Ely Braun Birgit Andrea Gartner Thibaut Desmettre Laurent Suppan |
| author_sort | Cédric Cibotto |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background In critically ill patients, tracheal intubation may be required in the prehospital setting, where airway management presents unique technical and logistical challenges. While videolaryngoscopy has emerged as a potential alternative to direct laryngoscopy by providing a better and easier visualization of the glottis, the improved view of anatomical structures does not necessarily correlate with successful tracheal tube placement. Intubation may be harder because novice providers performing videolaryngoscopy may only look at the screen and only obtain a two-dimensional representation of the patient’s airways. By directly visualizing the airways, these providers may obtain a better 3D apprehension and an improved mental visualization of the patient’s anatomy. We compared the impact of an unrestricted videolaryngoscopy use with a sequence consisting in direct visualization of the airway followed by videolaryngoscopy (“Direct Laryngoscopy-to-VideoLaryngoscopy sequence” or “DL-VL sequence”) on time to intubation among novice providers. Methods This was a parallel group simulated randomized controlled superiority trial. Participants were medical students or junior residents with an experience of less than 10 intubations. After a presentation and workshop on direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy, participants were randomized in two groups. In the control group, participants were free to use of the videolaryngoscope as they intended. In the other group (DL-VL sequence), participants were told to perform an initial direct laryngoscopy without looking at the video screen until they reached the epiglottis. All intubations were conducted in a simulated prehospital environment, with a high-fidelity manikin placed supine on the floor. Each participant performed three intubations of increasing levels of difficulty. The primary outcome was the time to intubation. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success, time to ventilation, and number of intubation attempts. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables while the t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Results Time to intubation was shorter in the control group (22±8 s vs. 27±11 s, p < 0.001). This difference was consistent in all levels of difficulties. First-pass success rates were similar (99/111, 89% in the control group vs. 85/105, 81%, p = 0.089). Time to ventilation was significantly shorter in the control group (37±9 vs. 41±11 s, p = 0.008). The mean number of intubation attempts was similar between groups (p = 0.231). Conclusion In this simulated study among novice providers, direct airway visualization prior to videolaryngoscopy did not improve time to intubation or to ventilation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Registration Number: NCT06918717, registered on April 8th, 2025. Retrospectively registered. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e8e932896f8a47419c92777f90a87603 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1471-227X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Emergency Medicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-e8e932896f8a47419c92777f90a876032025-08-20T03:03:24ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2025-07-012511810.1186/s12873-025-01266-0Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trialCédric Cibotto0Mathieu Pasquier1Nicolas Beysard2Frédéric Rouyer3Olivier Grosgurin4Laurent Bourgeois5Elio Erriquez6Ely Braun7Birgit Andrea Gartner8Thibaut Desmettre9Laurent Suppan10Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of LausanneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of LausanneDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsCollege of Higher Education in Ambulance Care, ESAMB - École Supérieure de Soins AmbulanciersDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University HospitalsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaAbstract Background In critically ill patients, tracheal intubation may be required in the prehospital setting, where airway management presents unique technical and logistical challenges. While videolaryngoscopy has emerged as a potential alternative to direct laryngoscopy by providing a better and easier visualization of the glottis, the improved view of anatomical structures does not necessarily correlate with successful tracheal tube placement. Intubation may be harder because novice providers performing videolaryngoscopy may only look at the screen and only obtain a two-dimensional representation of the patient’s airways. By directly visualizing the airways, these providers may obtain a better 3D apprehension and an improved mental visualization of the patient’s anatomy. We compared the impact of an unrestricted videolaryngoscopy use with a sequence consisting in direct visualization of the airway followed by videolaryngoscopy (“Direct Laryngoscopy-to-VideoLaryngoscopy sequence” or “DL-VL sequence”) on time to intubation among novice providers. Methods This was a parallel group simulated randomized controlled superiority trial. Participants were medical students or junior residents with an experience of less than 10 intubations. After a presentation and workshop on direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy, participants were randomized in two groups. In the control group, participants were free to use of the videolaryngoscope as they intended. In the other group (DL-VL sequence), participants were told to perform an initial direct laryngoscopy without looking at the video screen until they reached the epiglottis. All intubations were conducted in a simulated prehospital environment, with a high-fidelity manikin placed supine on the floor. Each participant performed three intubations of increasing levels of difficulty. The primary outcome was the time to intubation. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success, time to ventilation, and number of intubation attempts. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables while the t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Results Time to intubation was shorter in the control group (22±8 s vs. 27±11 s, p < 0.001). This difference was consistent in all levels of difficulties. First-pass success rates were similar (99/111, 89% in the control group vs. 85/105, 81%, p = 0.089). Time to ventilation was significantly shorter in the control group (37±9 vs. 41±11 s, p = 0.008). The mean number of intubation attempts was similar between groups (p = 0.231). Conclusion In this simulated study among novice providers, direct airway visualization prior to videolaryngoscopy did not improve time to intubation or to ventilation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Registration Number: NCT06918717, registered on April 8th, 2025. Retrospectively registered.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01266-0Advanced airway managementDirect laryngoscopyTracheal intubationPrehospitalVideolaryngoscopy |
| spellingShingle | Cédric Cibotto Mathieu Pasquier Nicolas Beysard Frédéric Rouyer Olivier Grosgurin Laurent Bourgeois Elio Erriquez Ely Braun Birgit Andrea Gartner Thibaut Desmettre Laurent Suppan Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial BMC Emergency Medicine Advanced airway management Direct laryngoscopy Tracheal intubation Prehospital Videolaryngoscopy |
| title | Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial |
| title_full | Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial |
| title_fullStr | Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial |
| title_short | Assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy: randomized controlled simulated trial |
| title_sort | assessment of prehospital tracheal intubation technique using initial direct laryngoscopy during videolaryngoscopy randomized controlled simulated trial |
| topic | Advanced airway management Direct laryngoscopy Tracheal intubation Prehospital Videolaryngoscopy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01266-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cedriccibotto assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT mathieupasquier assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT nicolasbeysard assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT fredericrouyer assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT oliviergrosgurin assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT laurentbourgeois assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT elioerriquez assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT elybraun assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT birgitandreagartner assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT thibautdesmettre assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial AT laurentsuppan assessmentofprehospitaltrachealintubationtechniqueusinginitialdirectlaryngoscopyduringvideolaryngoscopyrandomizedcontrolledsimulatedtrial |