Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment

Abstract Migraine significantly impacts quality of life, with eptinezumab emerging as a promising calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting therapy. Real-world data and clinical trials are crucial for evaluating its safety and effectiveness comprehensively. This study evaluated its safety using a du...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junchen Chen, Shunqiu Huang, Yashi Chen, Cheng Luo, Yong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09490-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333312369197056
author Junchen Chen
Shunqiu Huang
Yashi Chen
Cheng Luo
Yong Li
author_facet Junchen Chen
Shunqiu Huang
Yashi Chen
Cheng Luo
Yong Li
author_sort Junchen Chen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Migraine significantly impacts quality of life, with eptinezumab emerging as a promising calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting therapy. Real-world data and clinical trials are crucial for evaluating its safety and effectiveness comprehensively. This study evaluated its safety using a dual approach: pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2020–2024) and a systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical trials. FAERS data identified 5,306 adverse event (AE) reports, with “drug ineffective” (ROR = 6.71) and “migraine” (ROR = 67.45) as the strongest signals. Serious adverse events (SAEs) included anaphylactic reactions (ROR = 4.19) and rare events like increased intracranial pressure. Most AEs occurred within the first treatment month. A meta-analysis of six trials (n = 3,148) found no increased overall AE risk versus placebo (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.95–1.10) but a higher SAE incidence (RR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.27–6.48). Upper respiratory infections were more frequent (RR = 1.49, P = 0.04), while dizziness, nausea, and fatigue showed no significant differences. Eptinezumab shows promise but warrants further research on safety in vulnerable populations and real-world settings.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8b77f1fd3434d169ca4498bfe1f28b0
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-e8b77f1fd3434d169ca4498bfe1f28b02025-08-20T03:45:55ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115111510.1038/s41598-025-09490-1Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatmentJunchen Chen0Shunqiu Huang1Yashi Chen2Cheng Luo3Yong Li4Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical CollegeAbstract Migraine significantly impacts quality of life, with eptinezumab emerging as a promising calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting therapy. Real-world data and clinical trials are crucial for evaluating its safety and effectiveness comprehensively. This study evaluated its safety using a dual approach: pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2020–2024) and a systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical trials. FAERS data identified 5,306 adverse event (AE) reports, with “drug ineffective” (ROR = 6.71) and “migraine” (ROR = 67.45) as the strongest signals. Serious adverse events (SAEs) included anaphylactic reactions (ROR = 4.19) and rare events like increased intracranial pressure. Most AEs occurred within the first treatment month. A meta-analysis of six trials (n = 3,148) found no increased overall AE risk versus placebo (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.95–1.10) but a higher SAE incidence (RR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.27–6.48). Upper respiratory infections were more frequent (RR = 1.49, P = 0.04), while dizziness, nausea, and fatigue showed no significant differences. Eptinezumab shows promise but warrants further research on safety in vulnerable populations and real-world settings.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09490-1EptinezumabMigrainePharmacovigilanceFAERSAdverse eventsCGRP
spellingShingle Junchen Chen
Shunqiu Huang
Yashi Chen
Cheng Luo
Yong Li
Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
Scientific Reports
Eptinezumab
Migraine
Pharmacovigilance
FAERS
Adverse events
CGRP
title Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
title_full Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
title_fullStr Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
title_short Comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
title_sort comprehensive safety analysis of adverse events associated with eptinezumab in migraine treatment
topic Eptinezumab
Migraine
Pharmacovigilance
FAERS
Adverse events
CGRP
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09490-1
work_keys_str_mv AT junchenchen comprehensivesafetyanalysisofadverseeventsassociatedwitheptinezumabinmigrainetreatment
AT shunqiuhuang comprehensivesafetyanalysisofadverseeventsassociatedwitheptinezumabinmigrainetreatment
AT yashichen comprehensivesafetyanalysisofadverseeventsassociatedwitheptinezumabinmigrainetreatment
AT chengluo comprehensivesafetyanalysisofadverseeventsassociatedwitheptinezumabinmigrainetreatment
AT yongli comprehensivesafetyanalysisofadverseeventsassociatedwitheptinezumabinmigrainetreatment