HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.

<h4>Background</h4>Several serological assays have been developed to detect antibodies elicited against infections with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16. The association between antibody levels measured by various assays and subsequent HPV infection risk may differ. We compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shih-Wen Lin, Arpita Ghosh, Carolina Porras, Sarah C Markt, Ana Cecilia Rodriguez, Mark Schiffman, Sholom Wacholder, Troy J Kemp, Ligia A Pinto, Paula Gonzalez, Nicolas Wentzensen, Mark T Esser, Katie Matys, Ariane Meuree, Wim Quint, Leen-Jan van Doorn, Rolando Herrero, Allan Hildesheim, Mahboobeh Safaeian, Costa Rican Vaccine Trial Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053067&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850214883462742016
author Shih-Wen Lin
Arpita Ghosh
Carolina Porras
Sarah C Markt
Ana Cecilia Rodriguez
Mark Schiffman
Sholom Wacholder
Troy J Kemp
Ligia A Pinto
Paula Gonzalez
Nicolas Wentzensen
Mark T Esser
Katie Matys
Ariane Meuree
Wim Quint
Leen-Jan van Doorn
Rolando Herrero
Allan Hildesheim
Mahboobeh Safaeian
Costa Rican Vaccine Trial Group
author_facet Shih-Wen Lin
Arpita Ghosh
Carolina Porras
Sarah C Markt
Ana Cecilia Rodriguez
Mark Schiffman
Sholom Wacholder
Troy J Kemp
Ligia A Pinto
Paula Gonzalez
Nicolas Wentzensen
Mark T Esser
Katie Matys
Ariane Meuree
Wim Quint
Leen-Jan van Doorn
Rolando Herrero
Allan Hildesheim
Mahboobeh Safaeian
Costa Rican Vaccine Trial Group
author_sort Shih-Wen Lin
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Several serological assays have been developed to detect antibodies elicited against infections with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16. The association between antibody levels measured by various assays and subsequent HPV infection risk may differ. We compared HPV16-specific antibody levels previously measured by a virus-like particle (VLP)-based direct enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) with levels measured by additional assays and evaluated the protection against HPV16 infection conferred at different levels of the assays.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Replicate enrollment serum aliquots from 388 unvaccinated women in the control arm of the Costa Rica HPV vaccine trial were measured for HPV16 seropositivity using three serological assays: a VLP-based direct ELISA; a VLP-based competitive Luminex immunoassay (cLIA); and a secreted alkaline phosphatase protein neutralization assay (SEAP-NA). We assessed the association of assay seropositivity and risk of subsequent HPV16 infection over four years of follow-up by calculating sampling-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and HPV16 seropositivity based on standard cutoff from the cLIA was significantly associated with protection from subsequent HPV16 infection (OR = 0.48, CI = 0.27-0.86, compared with seronegatives). Compared with seronegatives, the highest seropositive tertile antibody levels from the direct ELISA (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.28-0.90) as well as the SEAP-NA (OR = 0.20, CI = 0.06, 0.64) were also significantly associated with protection from HPV16 infection.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Enrollment HPV16 seropositivity by any of the three serological assays evaluated was associated with protection from subsequent infection, although cutoffs for immune protection were different. We defined the assays and seropositivity levels after natural infection that better measure and translate to protective immunity.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8ac17a43a5d443080e7004b849bb09c
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-e8ac17a43a5d443080e7004b849bb09c2025-08-20T02:08:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0181e5306710.1371/journal.pone.0053067HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.Shih-Wen LinArpita GhoshCarolina PorrasSarah C MarktAna Cecilia RodriguezMark SchiffmanSholom WacholderTroy J KempLigia A PintoPaula GonzalezNicolas WentzensenMark T EsserKatie MatysAriane MeureeWim QuintLeen-Jan van DoornRolando HerreroAllan HildesheimMahboobeh SafaeianCosta Rican Vaccine Trial Group<h4>Background</h4>Several serological assays have been developed to detect antibodies elicited against infections with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16. The association between antibody levels measured by various assays and subsequent HPV infection risk may differ. We compared HPV16-specific antibody levels previously measured by a virus-like particle (VLP)-based direct enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) with levels measured by additional assays and evaluated the protection against HPV16 infection conferred at different levels of the assays.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Replicate enrollment serum aliquots from 388 unvaccinated women in the control arm of the Costa Rica HPV vaccine trial were measured for HPV16 seropositivity using three serological assays: a VLP-based direct ELISA; a VLP-based competitive Luminex immunoassay (cLIA); and a secreted alkaline phosphatase protein neutralization assay (SEAP-NA). We assessed the association of assay seropositivity and risk of subsequent HPV16 infection over four years of follow-up by calculating sampling-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and HPV16 seropositivity based on standard cutoff from the cLIA was significantly associated with protection from subsequent HPV16 infection (OR = 0.48, CI = 0.27-0.86, compared with seronegatives). Compared with seronegatives, the highest seropositive tertile antibody levels from the direct ELISA (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.28-0.90) as well as the SEAP-NA (OR = 0.20, CI = 0.06, 0.64) were also significantly associated with protection from HPV16 infection.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Enrollment HPV16 seropositivity by any of the three serological assays evaluated was associated with protection from subsequent infection, although cutoffs for immune protection were different. We defined the assays and seropositivity levels after natural infection that better measure and translate to protective immunity.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053067&type=printable
spellingShingle Shih-Wen Lin
Arpita Ghosh
Carolina Porras
Sarah C Markt
Ana Cecilia Rodriguez
Mark Schiffman
Sholom Wacholder
Troy J Kemp
Ligia A Pinto
Paula Gonzalez
Nicolas Wentzensen
Mark T Esser
Katie Matys
Ariane Meuree
Wim Quint
Leen-Jan van Doorn
Rolando Herrero
Allan Hildesheim
Mahboobeh Safaeian
Costa Rican Vaccine Trial Group
HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.
PLoS ONE
title HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.
title_full HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.
title_fullStr HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.
title_full_unstemmed HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.
title_short HPV16 seropositivity and subsequent HPV16 infection risk in a naturally infected population: comparison of serological assays.
title_sort hpv16 seropositivity and subsequent hpv16 infection risk in a naturally infected population comparison of serological assays
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0053067&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT shihwenlin hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT arpitaghosh hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT carolinaporras hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT sarahcmarkt hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT anaceciliarodriguez hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT markschiffman hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT sholomwacholder hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT troyjkemp hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT ligiaapinto hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT paulagonzalez hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT nicolaswentzensen hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT marktesser hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT katiematys hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT arianemeuree hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT wimquint hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT leenjanvandoorn hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT rolandoherrero hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT allanhildesheim hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT mahboobehsafaeian hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays
AT costaricanvaccinetrialgroup hpv16seropositivityandsubsequenthpv16infectionriskinanaturallyinfectedpopulationcomparisonofserologicalassays