Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study

Background and Aims: The available supraglottic devices (SGDs) used as conduits for fibreoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation (FOI) in children have shown no difference in terms of time taken for tracheal intubation or success rate on the first attempt. However, several difficulties have been report...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanika Chauhan, Sukhyanti Kerai, Kirti N. Saxena, Lalit Gupta, TH Prathap, Sonia Wadhawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-07-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_942_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849421634056749056
author Kanika Chauhan
Sukhyanti Kerai
Kirti N. Saxena
Lalit Gupta
TH Prathap
Sonia Wadhawan
author_facet Kanika Chauhan
Sukhyanti Kerai
Kirti N. Saxena
Lalit Gupta
TH Prathap
Sonia Wadhawan
author_sort Kanika Chauhan
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: The available supraglottic devices (SGDs) used as conduits for fibreoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation (FOI) in children have shown no difference in terms of time taken for tracheal intubation or success rate on the first attempt. However, several difficulties have been reported during the removal of the SGD after FOI. This study aimed to compare the feasibility of the safe removal of conduits after FOI through BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway (BlockBuster) and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q) in paediatric patients. Methods: This was a randomised comparative study conducted on 66 children between the ages of 1 and 8 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. FOI was performed using BlockBuster or Air-Q as a conduit in study groups. The primary outcome was the time taken and the ease of removing the conduit after FOI. The secondary outcomes included adverse events during conduit removal. We also compared the number of attempts and time taken for the successful placement of these SGDs, as well as for FOI utilising them as conduits. An independent samples t-test was used for normally distributed variables, and a Chi-square test for qualitative variables, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: The ease of removing the conduit was comparable in both groups (P = 0.21). The mean time taken to remove the conduit was lower in the Blockbuster group [28.03 [standard deviation (SD: 5.90] [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.01, 30.04] seconds] compared to the control group (30.27 (SD: 5.54) (95% CI: 28.38, 32.16) seconds; P = 0.03). There were no adverse events during conduit removal in the BlockBuster and the Air-Q group. The number of attempts (P = 0.317) and time taken for the successful placement of SGDs (P = 0.054) in the study groups and FOI through them was found to be comparable (P = 0.692). Conclusion: For FOB-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients, BlockBuster is comparable to Air-Q, and it may be a useful alternative.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8872994ce6644f1ae9cf5db4dcb5e7a
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj-art-e8872994ce6644f1ae9cf5db4dcb5e7a2025-08-20T03:31:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172025-07-0169768769210.4103/ija.ija_942_24Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative studyKanika ChauhanSukhyanti KeraiKirti N. SaxenaLalit GuptaTH PrathapSonia WadhawanBackground and Aims: The available supraglottic devices (SGDs) used as conduits for fibreoptic bronchoscope-guided intubation (FOI) in children have shown no difference in terms of time taken for tracheal intubation or success rate on the first attempt. However, several difficulties have been reported during the removal of the SGD after FOI. This study aimed to compare the feasibility of the safe removal of conduits after FOI through BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway (BlockBuster) and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q) in paediatric patients. Methods: This was a randomised comparative study conducted on 66 children between the ages of 1 and 8 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. FOI was performed using BlockBuster or Air-Q as a conduit in study groups. The primary outcome was the time taken and the ease of removing the conduit after FOI. The secondary outcomes included adverse events during conduit removal. We also compared the number of attempts and time taken for the successful placement of these SGDs, as well as for FOI utilising them as conduits. An independent samples t-test was used for normally distributed variables, and a Chi-square test for qualitative variables, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: The ease of removing the conduit was comparable in both groups (P = 0.21). The mean time taken to remove the conduit was lower in the Blockbuster group [28.03 [standard deviation (SD: 5.90] [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.01, 30.04] seconds] compared to the control group (30.27 (SD: 5.54) (95% CI: 28.38, 32.16) seconds; P = 0.03). There were no adverse events during conduit removal in the BlockBuster and the Air-Q group. The number of attempts (P = 0.317) and time taken for the successful placement of SGDs (P = 0.054) in the study groups and FOI through them was found to be comparable (P = 0.692). Conclusion: For FOB-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients, BlockBuster is comparable to Air-Q, and it may be a useful alternative.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_942_24airwayanaesthesiaair-q laryngeal mask airwaybronchoscopesendotracheal intubationfibreopticlaryngeal mask airwaylma blockbusterpaediatricsupraglottic device
spellingShingle Kanika Chauhan
Sukhyanti Kerai
Kirti N. Saxena
Lalit Gupta
TH Prathap
Sonia Wadhawan
Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
airway
anaesthesia
air-q laryngeal mask airway
bronchoscopes
endotracheal intubation
fibreoptic
laryngeal mask airway
lma blockbuster
paediatric
supraglottic device
title Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study
title_full Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study
title_fullStr Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study
title_short Comparison of BlockBuster® Laryngeal Mask Airway and Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients: A randomised comparative study
title_sort comparison of blockbuster r laryngeal mask airway and air q r intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for fibreoptic bronchoscopy guided tracheal intubation in paediatric patients a randomised comparative study
topic airway
anaesthesia
air-q laryngeal mask airway
bronchoscopes
endotracheal intubation
fibreoptic
laryngeal mask airway
lma blockbuster
paediatric
supraglottic device
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_942_24
work_keys_str_mv AT kanikachauhan comparisonofblockbusterlaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayasaconduitforfibreopticbronchoscopyguidedtrachealintubationinpaediatricpatientsarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT sukhyantikerai comparisonofblockbusterlaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayasaconduitforfibreopticbronchoscopyguidedtrachealintubationinpaediatricpatientsarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT kirtinsaxena comparisonofblockbusterlaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayasaconduitforfibreopticbronchoscopyguidedtrachealintubationinpaediatricpatientsarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT lalitgupta comparisonofblockbusterlaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayasaconduitforfibreopticbronchoscopyguidedtrachealintubationinpaediatricpatientsarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT thprathap comparisonofblockbusterlaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayasaconduitforfibreopticbronchoscopyguidedtrachealintubationinpaediatricpatientsarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT soniawadhawan comparisonofblockbusterlaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayasaconduitforfibreopticbronchoscopyguidedtrachealintubationinpaediatricpatientsarandomisedcomparativestudy