Motivated reasoning in the field: polarization of prose, precedent, and policy in U.S. Circuit Courts, 1891-2013.
This study explores politically motivated reasoning among U.S. Circuit Court judges over the past 120 years, examining their writing style and use of previous case citations in judicial opinions. Employing natural language processing and supervised machine learning, we scrutinize how judges' la...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Wei Lu, Daniel L Chen |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318790 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Judging Judges: A Study of U.S. Federal District Court Judges in the 10th Circuit
by: Eli Wald
Published: (2017-12-01) -
No home court advantage: The trump impeachment trial and attitudes toward the U.S. Supreme Court
by: Miles T Armaly, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
The consistency of Federalist Society-affiliated U.S. supreme court justices.
by: Tim Komatsu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Online language of violent rioters displayed weak group affiliation preceding the U.S. Capitol Breach
by: Ari P. Kirshenbaum, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
“No reason for children to go hungry”: Rural U.S. caregivers’ perceptions of elected officials and their impacts on food policy
by: Annie Hardison-Moody, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)