Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study
Background/purpose: Many designs of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) are available for clinician to achieve proper implant position. However, there were not any studies that approached the design alone to evaluate whether sleeve-in-sleeve or sleeve-on-drill design provided most accur...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Dental Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S199179022400237X |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846118016311361536 |
|---|---|
| author | Papon Pattanasirikun Sirida Arunjaroensuk Sappasith Panya Keskanya Subbalekha Nikos Mattheos Atiphan Pimkhaokham |
| author_facet | Papon Pattanasirikun Sirida Arunjaroensuk Sappasith Panya Keskanya Subbalekha Nikos Mattheos Atiphan Pimkhaokham |
| author_sort | Papon Pattanasirikun |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background/purpose: Many designs of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) are available for clinician to achieve proper implant position. However, there were not any studies that approached the design alone to evaluate whether sleeve-in-sleeve or sleeve-on-drill design provided most accuracy implant position. The purpose of this study was to investigate the precision of implant placement with sleeve-in-sleeve and sleeve-on-drill static computer assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) designs. Materials and methods: Thirty-two models were fabricated simulating a patient with bilateral missing first premolar. Eight models (sixteen implants) were assigned in each group: Group A, B and C represented sleeve-in-sleeve design with 2, 4 and 6 mm sleeve height respectively. Group D represented integrated sleeve-on-drill design with 4 mm sleeve height. 3D deviation at implant platform, apex and angular deviation were measured. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Results: The overall deviation at platform ranged from 0.40 ± 0.14 mm (group A) to 0.73 ± 1.54 mm (group C), at apex from 0.46 ± 0.16 mm (group A) to 1.07 ± 0.37 mm (group C) and the angular deviation ranged from 0.86 ± 0.89° (group A) to 3.40 ± 1.29° (group C). Group A and B showed significantly less deviation than groups C and D (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in all parameters measured between group A and B, as well as between group C and D (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Sleeve-in-sleeve sCAIS demonstrated higher precision than sleeve-on-drill sCAIS. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e833635be5db4fddb2b21c6e838be2e2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1991-7902 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Dental Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-e833635be5db4fddb2b21c6e838be2e22024-12-18T08:48:00ZengElsevierJournal of Dental Sciences1991-79022024-12-0119S38S43Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental studyPapon Pattanasirikun0Sirida Arunjaroensuk1Sappasith Panya2Keskanya Subbalekha3Nikos Mattheos4Atiphan Pimkhaokham5Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, ThailandFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SwedenFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Digital Implant Surgery Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Corresponding author. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Henri Dunant Road, Wangmai, Patumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.Background/purpose: Many designs of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) are available for clinician to achieve proper implant position. However, there were not any studies that approached the design alone to evaluate whether sleeve-in-sleeve or sleeve-on-drill design provided most accuracy implant position. The purpose of this study was to investigate the precision of implant placement with sleeve-in-sleeve and sleeve-on-drill static computer assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) designs. Materials and methods: Thirty-two models were fabricated simulating a patient with bilateral missing first premolar. Eight models (sixteen implants) were assigned in each group: Group A, B and C represented sleeve-in-sleeve design with 2, 4 and 6 mm sleeve height respectively. Group D represented integrated sleeve-on-drill design with 4 mm sleeve height. 3D deviation at implant platform, apex and angular deviation were measured. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Results: The overall deviation at platform ranged from 0.40 ± 0.14 mm (group A) to 0.73 ± 1.54 mm (group C), at apex from 0.46 ± 0.16 mm (group A) to 1.07 ± 0.37 mm (group C) and the angular deviation ranged from 0.86 ± 0.89° (group A) to 3.40 ± 1.29° (group C). Group A and B showed significantly less deviation than groups C and D (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in all parameters measured between group A and B, as well as between group C and D (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Sleeve-in-sleeve sCAIS demonstrated higher precision than sleeve-on-drill sCAIS.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S199179022400237XComputer-assisted implant surgeryDental implantDrilling systemGuided surgeryPrecision |
| spellingShingle | Papon Pattanasirikun Sirida Arunjaroensuk Sappasith Panya Keskanya Subbalekha Nikos Mattheos Atiphan Pimkhaokham Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study Journal of Dental Sciences Computer-assisted implant surgery Dental implant Drilling system Guided surgery Precision |
| title | Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study |
| title_full | Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study |
| title_short | Comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study |
| title_sort | comparison of precision of implant placement between two different guided systems for static computer assisted implant surgery a simulation based experimental study |
| topic | Computer-assisted implant surgery Dental implant Drilling system Guided surgery Precision |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S199179022400237X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT paponpattanasirikun comparisonofprecisionofimplantplacementbetweentwodifferentguidedsystemsforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryasimulationbasedexperimentalstudy AT siridaarunjaroensuk comparisonofprecisionofimplantplacementbetweentwodifferentguidedsystemsforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryasimulationbasedexperimentalstudy AT sappasithpanya comparisonofprecisionofimplantplacementbetweentwodifferentguidedsystemsforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryasimulationbasedexperimentalstudy AT keskanyasubbalekha comparisonofprecisionofimplantplacementbetweentwodifferentguidedsystemsforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryasimulationbasedexperimentalstudy AT nikosmattheos comparisonofprecisionofimplantplacementbetweentwodifferentguidedsystemsforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryasimulationbasedexperimentalstudy AT atiphanpimkhaokham comparisonofprecisionofimplantplacementbetweentwodifferentguidedsystemsforstaticcomputerassistedimplantsurgeryasimulationbasedexperimentalstudy |