Comparative Judgment: Building a Shared Consensus Over Rater Variation in Assessing Second Language Writing Performance
Rater variation has been a persistent concern for rater-mediated writing assessments. Instead of treating rater variation as an undesired source of measurement error, the method of comparative judgment (CJ) uses pairwise comparisons to elicit relative judgments from raters and statistical estimation...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Qian Wu |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | SAGE Open |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251346346 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Rater judgments and word difficulty: Conceptualizing the substantive validity of the VST
by: Derek N. Canning, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Investigating the Impact of Rater Training on Rater Errors in the Process of Assessing Writing Skill
by: İsmail Karakaya, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
The influence of rater empathy, age and experience on writing performance assessment
by: Pilvi Alp, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Technology and Second Language Writing
by: Soobin Yim, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01) -
Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom.
by: Madeleine Youmans
Published: (1993-01-01)