Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China

Abstract Aim Cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality rates are high in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors and differences between lean MAFLD and overweight MAFLD, and establish and validate a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruya Zhu, Caicai Xu, Suwen Jiang, Jianping Xia, Boming Wu, Sijia Zhang, Jing Zhou, Hongliang Liu, Hongshan Li, Jianjun Lou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02373-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850238259300401152
author Ruya Zhu
Caicai Xu
Suwen Jiang
Jianping Xia
Boming Wu
Sijia Zhang
Jing Zhou
Hongliang Liu
Hongshan Li
Jianjun Lou
author_facet Ruya Zhu
Caicai Xu
Suwen Jiang
Jianping Xia
Boming Wu
Sijia Zhang
Jing Zhou
Hongliang Liu
Hongshan Li
Jianjun Lou
author_sort Ruya Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim Cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality rates are high in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors and differences between lean MAFLD and overweight MAFLD, and establish and validate a nomogram model for predicting lean MAFLD. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 4363 participants who underwent annual health checkup at Yuyao from 2019 to 2022. The study population was stratified into three groups: non-MAFLD, lean MAFLD (defined as the presence of fatty liver changes as determined by ultrasound in individuals with a BMI < 25 kg/m2), and overweight MAFLD (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2). Subsequent modeling analysis was conducted in a population that included healthy subjects with < 25 kg/m2 (n = 2104) and subjects with lean MAFLD (n = 849). The study population was randomly split (7:3 ratio) to a training vs. a validation cohort. Risk factors for lean MAFLD was identify by multivariate regression of the training cohort, and used to construct a nomogram to estimate the probability of lean MAFLD. Model performance was examined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and k-fold cross-validation (k = 5). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model. Results The multivariate regression analysis indicated that the triglycerides and glucose index (TyG) was the most significant risk factor for lean MAFLD (OR: 4.03, 95% CI 2.806–5.786). The restricted cubic spline curves (RCS) regression model demonstrated that the relationships between systolic pressure (SBP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum urate (UA), total cholesterol (TCHO), triglyceride (TG), triglyceride glucose (TyG) index, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and MAFLD were nonlinear and the cutoff values for lean MAFLD and overweight MAFLD were different. The nomogram was constructed based on seven predictors: glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), serum ferritin (SF), ALT, UA, BMI, TyG index, and age. In the validation cohort, the area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (95% CI 0.842–0.891), with 83.8% sensitivity and 76.6% specificity at the optimal cutoff. The PPV and NPV was 63.3% and 90.8%, respectively. Furthermore, we used fivefold cross-validation and the average area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (Figure S3). The calibration curves for the model’s predictions and the actual outcomes were in good agreement. The DCA findings demonstrated that the nomogram model was clinically useful throughout a broad threshold probability range. Conclusions Lean and overweight MAFLD exhibit distinct metabolic profiles. The nomogram model developed in this study is designed to assist clinicians in the early identification of high-risk individuals with lean MAFLD, including those with a normal BMI but at metabolic risk, as well as those with abnormal blood lipid, glucose, uric acid or transaminase levels. In addition, this model enhances screening efforts in communities and medical screening centers, ultimately ensuring more timely and effective medical services for patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8262314f8ad48299e31ed7cf415ea91
institution OA Journals
issn 2047-783X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series European Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj-art-e8262314f8ad48299e31ed7cf415ea912025-08-20T02:01:29ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2025-02-0130111510.1186/s40001-025-02373-1Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in ChinaRuya Zhu0Caicai Xu1Suwen Jiang2Jianping Xia3Boming Wu4Sijia Zhang5Jing Zhou6Hongliang Liu7Hongshan Li8Jianjun Lou9Liver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalChronic Liver Disease Center, The Affiliated Yangming Hospital of Ningbo UniversityLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalLiver Disease Department of Integrative Medicine, Ningbo No. 2 HospitalChronic Liver Disease Center, The Affiliated Yangming Hospital of Ningbo UniversityAbstract Aim Cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality rates are high in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors and differences between lean MAFLD and overweight MAFLD, and establish and validate a nomogram model for predicting lean MAFLD. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 4363 participants who underwent annual health checkup at Yuyao from 2019 to 2022. The study population was stratified into three groups: non-MAFLD, lean MAFLD (defined as the presence of fatty liver changes as determined by ultrasound in individuals with a BMI < 25 kg/m2), and overweight MAFLD (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2). Subsequent modeling analysis was conducted in a population that included healthy subjects with < 25 kg/m2 (n = 2104) and subjects with lean MAFLD (n = 849). The study population was randomly split (7:3 ratio) to a training vs. a validation cohort. Risk factors for lean MAFLD was identify by multivariate regression of the training cohort, and used to construct a nomogram to estimate the probability of lean MAFLD. Model performance was examined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and k-fold cross-validation (k = 5). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model. Results The multivariate regression analysis indicated that the triglycerides and glucose index (TyG) was the most significant risk factor for lean MAFLD (OR: 4.03, 95% CI 2.806–5.786). The restricted cubic spline curves (RCS) regression model demonstrated that the relationships between systolic pressure (SBP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum urate (UA), total cholesterol (TCHO), triglyceride (TG), triglyceride glucose (TyG) index, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and MAFLD were nonlinear and the cutoff values for lean MAFLD and overweight MAFLD were different. The nomogram was constructed based on seven predictors: glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), serum ferritin (SF), ALT, UA, BMI, TyG index, and age. In the validation cohort, the area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (95% CI 0.842–0.891), with 83.8% sensitivity and 76.6% specificity at the optimal cutoff. The PPV and NPV was 63.3% and 90.8%, respectively. Furthermore, we used fivefold cross-validation and the average area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (Figure S3). The calibration curves for the model’s predictions and the actual outcomes were in good agreement. The DCA findings demonstrated that the nomogram model was clinically useful throughout a broad threshold probability range. Conclusions Lean and overweight MAFLD exhibit distinct metabolic profiles. The nomogram model developed in this study is designed to assist clinicians in the early identification of high-risk individuals with lean MAFLD, including those with a normal BMI but at metabolic risk, as well as those with abnormal blood lipid, glucose, uric acid or transaminase levels. In addition, this model enhances screening efforts in communities and medical screening centers, ultimately ensuring more timely and effective medical services for patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02373-1Lean MAFLDOverweight MAFLDRisk factorsHealth check-up populationNomogram prediction model
spellingShingle Ruya Zhu
Caicai Xu
Suwen Jiang
Jianping Xia
Boming Wu
Sijia Zhang
Jing Zhou
Hongliang Liu
Hongshan Li
Jianjun Lou
Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China
European Journal of Medical Research
Lean MAFLD
Overweight MAFLD
Risk factors
Health check-up population
Nomogram prediction model
title Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China
title_full Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China
title_fullStr Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China
title_full_unstemmed Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China
title_short Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean MAFLD: a cross-sectional study of a health check-up population in China
title_sort risk factor analysis and predictive model construction of lean mafld a cross sectional study of a health check up population in china
topic Lean MAFLD
Overweight MAFLD
Risk factors
Health check-up population
Nomogram prediction model
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02373-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ruyazhu riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT caicaixu riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT suwenjiang riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT jianpingxia riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT bomingwu riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT sijiazhang riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT jingzhou riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT hongliangliu riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT hongshanli riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina
AT jianjunlou riskfactoranalysisandpredictivemodelconstructionofleanmafldacrosssectionalstudyofahealthcheckuppopulationinchina