Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types

Abstract Background The diverse types and processing methods of grains intricately influence the sites and digestibility of starch digestion, thereby impacting energy utilization. This study aimed to explore the impact of grain variety and processing methods on the net energy (NE) in dairy goats, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaodong Su, Lei Zhang, Yiyang Sun, Yanbo Wu, Jianrong Ren, Shengru Wu, Xinjian Lei, Jun Zhang, Dangdang Wang, Hao Ren, Junhu Yao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01136-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559179763908608
author Xiaodong Su
Lei Zhang
Yiyang Sun
Yanbo Wu
Jianrong Ren
Shengru Wu
Xinjian Lei
Jun Zhang
Dangdang Wang
Hao Ren
Junhu Yao
author_facet Xiaodong Su
Lei Zhang
Yiyang Sun
Yanbo Wu
Jianrong Ren
Shengru Wu
Xinjian Lei
Jun Zhang
Dangdang Wang
Hao Ren
Junhu Yao
author_sort Xiaodong Su
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The diverse types and processing methods of grains intricately influence the sites and digestibility of starch digestion, thereby impacting energy utilization. This study aimed to explore the impact of grain variety and processing methods on the net energy (NE) in dairy goats, analyzing these effects at the level of nutrient digestion and metabolism. Methods Eighteen castrated Guanzhong dairy goats (44.25 ± 3.59 kg BW) were randomly divided into 3 groups, each consisting of 6 replicates. The substitution method was employed to determine the NE values of the dry-rolled corn (DRC), dry-rolled wheat (DRW) or steam-flaked corn (SFC, 360 g/L). Briefly, two phases were performed. Throughout the basal phase, all goats were fed the same basal diet. In the substitution phase, 30% of the basal diet was replaced with DRC, DRW and SFC, respectively. Results In this study, the NE values of the DRC, DRW and SFC were 7.65, 7.54 and 7.44 MJ/kg DM, respectively. Compared to the DRC group, the DRW group showed increased digestibility of starch and crude protein (CP). Similarly, the SFC group exhibited increased organic matter (OM) and starch digestibility and a trend towards higher dry matter (DM) digestibility, reduced fecal OM and starch content. Additionally, fecal volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations decreased in goats fed SFC. Correspondingly, digestible energy (DE) in the DRW and SFC groups tended to be higher than in the DRC group. DRW increased total VFA concentration compared to DRC, while SFC increased the proportion of propionate and decreased the acetate-to-propionate ratio in the rumen. Both the DRW and SFC diets elevated serum glucose levels. Furthermore, heat increment (HI) and gaseous energy (GasE) related to fermentation were significantly higher in the DRW and SFC groups compared to the DRC group. Conclusion Our findings indicated that DRW and SFC increased rumen starch fermentation in goats, thereby improving total tract starch digestion and DE. However, DRW and SFC failed to improve NE value due to increased heat and gas energy production from fermentation. Therefore, excessively refined grains processing in the diet of dairy goats does not effectively improve energy efficiency.
format Article
id doaj-art-e81bbe2e513b4effb8f4fc00b1216045
institution Kabale University
issn 2049-1891
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
spelling doaj-art-e81bbe2e513b4effb8f4fc00b12160452025-01-05T12:42:34ZengBMCJournal of Animal Science and Biotechnology2049-18912025-01-0116111210.1186/s40104-024-01136-yNet energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain typesXiaodong Su0Lei Zhang1Yiyang Sun2Yanbo Wu3Jianrong Ren4Shengru Wu5Xinjian Lei6Jun Zhang7Dangdang Wang8Hao Ren9Junhu Yao10College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F UniversityAbstract Background The diverse types and processing methods of grains intricately influence the sites and digestibility of starch digestion, thereby impacting energy utilization. This study aimed to explore the impact of grain variety and processing methods on the net energy (NE) in dairy goats, analyzing these effects at the level of nutrient digestion and metabolism. Methods Eighteen castrated Guanzhong dairy goats (44.25 ± 3.59 kg BW) were randomly divided into 3 groups, each consisting of 6 replicates. The substitution method was employed to determine the NE values of the dry-rolled corn (DRC), dry-rolled wheat (DRW) or steam-flaked corn (SFC, 360 g/L). Briefly, two phases were performed. Throughout the basal phase, all goats were fed the same basal diet. In the substitution phase, 30% of the basal diet was replaced with DRC, DRW and SFC, respectively. Results In this study, the NE values of the DRC, DRW and SFC were 7.65, 7.54 and 7.44 MJ/kg DM, respectively. Compared to the DRC group, the DRW group showed increased digestibility of starch and crude protein (CP). Similarly, the SFC group exhibited increased organic matter (OM) and starch digestibility and a trend towards higher dry matter (DM) digestibility, reduced fecal OM and starch content. Additionally, fecal volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations decreased in goats fed SFC. Correspondingly, digestible energy (DE) in the DRW and SFC groups tended to be higher than in the DRC group. DRW increased total VFA concentration compared to DRC, while SFC increased the proportion of propionate and decreased the acetate-to-propionate ratio in the rumen. Both the DRW and SFC diets elevated serum glucose levels. Furthermore, heat increment (HI) and gaseous energy (GasE) related to fermentation were significantly higher in the DRW and SFC groups compared to the DRC group. Conclusion Our findings indicated that DRW and SFC increased rumen starch fermentation in goats, thereby improving total tract starch digestion and DE. However, DRW and SFC failed to improve NE value due to increased heat and gas energy production from fermentation. Therefore, excessively refined grains processing in the diet of dairy goats does not effectively improve energy efficiency.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01136-yDairy goatsEnergy metabolismGrain typesProcessingStarch digestion
spellingShingle Xiaodong Su
Lei Zhang
Yiyang Sun
Yanbo Wu
Jianrong Ren
Shengru Wu
Xinjian Lei
Jun Zhang
Dangdang Wang
Hao Ren
Junhu Yao
Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Dairy goats
Energy metabolism
Grain types
Processing
Starch digestion
title Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
title_full Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
title_fullStr Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
title_full_unstemmed Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
title_short Net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
title_sort net energy of grains for dairy goats differed with processing methods and grain types
topic Dairy goats
Energy metabolism
Grain types
Processing
Starch digestion
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01136-y
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaodongsu netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT leizhang netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT yiyangsun netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT yanbowu netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT jianrongren netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT shengruwu netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT xinjianlei netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT junzhang netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT dangdangwang netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT haoren netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes
AT junhuyao netenergyofgrainsfordairygoatsdifferedwithprocessingmethodsandgraintypes