Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review
Objective To evaluate the role of using outputs from patient-facing online triage tools in clinical decision-making in primary care.Design Systematic review.Data sources Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for literature...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e094068.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850186363541913600 |
|---|---|
| author | Gary A Abel Helen Atherton Jo Parsons Armina Paule |
| author_facet | Gary A Abel Helen Atherton Jo Parsons Armina Paule |
| author_sort | Gary A Abel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective To evaluate the role of using outputs from patient-facing online triage tools in clinical decision-making in primary care.Design Systematic review.Data sources Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for literature published between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2022 and updated for literature published up to end of November 2024.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies of any design are included where the study investigates how primary care clinicians make clinical decisions in response to patient concerns reported using online triage tools.Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted, and quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the findings.Results 14 studies were included, which were conducted in the UK (n=9), Sweden (n=3) and Spain (n=2). There were no studies that examined clinical decision-making as an outcome. Outcomes relating to the impact on clinical decision-making were grouped into three categories: patient clinical outcomes (n=9), primary care practitioner experience (n=11) and healthcare system outcomes (n=14). Studies reported faster clinical decisions made in response to patient concerns. Other studies reported clinicians offering unnecessary urgent appointments as patients learnt to ‘game’ the system. Clinicians felt confident managing patient requests as they can access additional information (such as a photo attachment). Moreover, clinicians’ time was freed up from appointments with limited clinical value. Contrarily, online triage was perceived as an additional step in the workflow.Conclusion Clinicians should be aware that their decision-making processes are likely to differ when using online triage tools. Developers can use the findings to improve the usability of the tools to aid clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on patient-facing online triage tools in general practice and the process of clinical decision-making.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022373944. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e7f4f5f63fdf48f784bf333a1aa90040 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-e7f4f5f63fdf48f784bf333a1aa900402025-08-20T02:16:22ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-05-0115510.1136/bmjopen-2024-094068Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic reviewGary A Abel0Helen Atherton1Jo Parsons2Armina Paule3Department of Health and Community Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UKPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKBirmingham Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science (BCEIS), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKApplied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UKObjective To evaluate the role of using outputs from patient-facing online triage tools in clinical decision-making in primary care.Design Systematic review.Data sources Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for literature published between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2022 and updated for literature published up to end of November 2024.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies of any design are included where the study investigates how primary care clinicians make clinical decisions in response to patient concerns reported using online triage tools.Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted, and quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the findings.Results 14 studies were included, which were conducted in the UK (n=9), Sweden (n=3) and Spain (n=2). There were no studies that examined clinical decision-making as an outcome. Outcomes relating to the impact on clinical decision-making were grouped into three categories: patient clinical outcomes (n=9), primary care practitioner experience (n=11) and healthcare system outcomes (n=14). Studies reported faster clinical decisions made in response to patient concerns. Other studies reported clinicians offering unnecessary urgent appointments as patients learnt to ‘game’ the system. Clinicians felt confident managing patient requests as they can access additional information (such as a photo attachment). Moreover, clinicians’ time was freed up from appointments with limited clinical value. Contrarily, online triage was perceived as an additional step in the workflow.Conclusion Clinicians should be aware that their decision-making processes are likely to differ when using online triage tools. Developers can use the findings to improve the usability of the tools to aid clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on patient-facing online triage tools in general practice and the process of clinical decision-making.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022373944.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e094068.full |
| spellingShingle | Gary A Abel Helen Atherton Jo Parsons Armina Paule Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review BMJ Open |
| title | Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review |
| title_full | Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review |
| title_short | Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review |
| title_sort | patient facing online triage tools and clinician decision making a systematic review |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e094068.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT garyaabel patientfacingonlinetriagetoolsandcliniciandecisionmakingasystematicreview AT helenatherton patientfacingonlinetriagetoolsandcliniciandecisionmakingasystematicreview AT joparsons patientfacingonlinetriagetoolsandcliniciandecisionmakingasystematicreview AT arminapaule patientfacingonlinetriagetoolsandcliniciandecisionmakingasystematicreview |