A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study

**Background:** Given the increased attention to functional improvement in spine surgery as it relates to motion preservation, activities of daily living, and cost, it is critical to fully understand the healthcare economic impact of new devices being tested in large FDA randomized controlled trials...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jared D. Ament, Amir Vokshoor, Yaser Badr, Todd Lanman, Kee D. Kim, J. Patrick Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.33035
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860315977154560
author Jared D. Ament
Amir Vokshoor
Yaser Badr
Todd Lanman
Kee D. Kim
J. Patrick Johnson
author_facet Jared D. Ament
Amir Vokshoor
Yaser Badr
Todd Lanman
Kee D. Kim
J. Patrick Johnson
author_sort Jared D. Ament
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Given the increased attention to functional improvement in spine surgery as it relates to motion preservation, activities of daily living, and cost, it is critical to fully understand the healthcare economic impact of new devices being tested in large FDA randomized controlled trials (RCT). The purpose of this analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the novel Total Posterior Spine (TOPS™) System investigational device compared with the trial control group, standard transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). **Objective:** To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TOPS™ compared with TLIF. **Methods:** The study patient population was extracted from a multicenter RCT with current enrollment at n=121 with complete 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness, expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Secondary outcomes were health-related utility, presented as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost, calculated in US dollars. Analysis was conducted following Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness Health and Medicine recommendations. The base case analysis utilized SF-36 survey data from the RCT. Both cost and QALY outcomes were discounted at a yearly rate of 3% to reflect their present value. A cohort Markov model was constructed to analyze perioperative and postoperative costs and QALYs for both TOPS™ and control groups. Scenario, probabilistic, and threshold sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine model discrimination and calibration. **Results:** The primary time horizon used to estimate cost and health utility was 2 years after index surgery. From a health system perspective, assuming a 50/50 split between Medicare and private payers, the TOPS™ cohort is cost-effective 2 years postoperatively ($6158/QALY) compared with control. At 6 years and beyond, TOPS™ becomes dominant, irrespective of payer mix and surgical setting. At willingness-to-pay thresholds of $100 000/QALY, 63% of all 5000 input parameter simulations favor TOPS, even with a $4000 upcharge vs TLIF. **Discussion:** The novel TOPS™ device is cost-effective compared with TLIF and becomes the dominant economic strategy over time. **Conclusions:** In the emerging, rapidly expanding field of value-based medicine, there will be an increased demand for these analyses, ensuring surgeons are empowered to make the best, most sustainable solutions for their patients and society.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7f13adb74e74ae5b1fac96e4ab64d86
institution Kabale University
issn 2327-2236
language English
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj-art-e7f13adb74e74ae5b1fac96e4ab64d862025-02-10T16:13:13ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362022-03-0191A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE StudyJared D. AmentAmir VokshoorYaser BadrTodd LanmanKee D. KimJ. Patrick Johnson**Background:** Given the increased attention to functional improvement in spine surgery as it relates to motion preservation, activities of daily living, and cost, it is critical to fully understand the healthcare economic impact of new devices being tested in large FDA randomized controlled trials (RCT). The purpose of this analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the novel Total Posterior Spine (TOPS™) System investigational device compared with the trial control group, standard transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). **Objective:** To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TOPS™ compared with TLIF. **Methods:** The study patient population was extracted from a multicenter RCT with current enrollment at n=121 with complete 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness, expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Secondary outcomes were health-related utility, presented as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cost, calculated in US dollars. Analysis was conducted following Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness Health and Medicine recommendations. The base case analysis utilized SF-36 survey data from the RCT. Both cost and QALY outcomes were discounted at a yearly rate of 3% to reflect their present value. A cohort Markov model was constructed to analyze perioperative and postoperative costs and QALYs for both TOPS™ and control groups. Scenario, probabilistic, and threshold sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine model discrimination and calibration. **Results:** The primary time horizon used to estimate cost and health utility was 2 years after index surgery. From a health system perspective, assuming a 50/50 split between Medicare and private payers, the TOPS™ cohort is cost-effective 2 years postoperatively ($6158/QALY) compared with control. At 6 years and beyond, TOPS™ becomes dominant, irrespective of payer mix and surgical setting. At willingness-to-pay thresholds of $100 000/QALY, 63% of all 5000 input parameter simulations favor TOPS, even with a $4000 upcharge vs TLIF. **Discussion:** The novel TOPS™ device is cost-effective compared with TLIF and becomes the dominant economic strategy over time. **Conclusions:** In the emerging, rapidly expanding field of value-based medicine, there will be an increased demand for these analyses, ensuring surgeons are empowered to make the best, most sustainable solutions for their patients and society.https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.33035
spellingShingle Jared D. Ament
Amir Vokshoor
Yaser Badr
Todd Lanman
Kee D. Kim
J. Patrick Johnson
A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study
title_full A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study
title_fullStr A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study
title_short A Prospective Study of Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Early Cost-effective Assessment from the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS™) IDE Study
title_sort prospective study of lumbar facet arthroplasty in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis early cost effective assessment from the total posterior spine system tops™ ide study
url https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.33035
work_keys_str_mv AT jareddament aprospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT amirvokshoor aprospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT yaserbadr aprospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT toddlanman aprospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT keedkim aprospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT jpatrickjohnson aprospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT jareddament prospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT amirvokshoor prospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT yaserbadr prospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT toddlanman prospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT keedkim prospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy
AT jpatrickjohnson prospectivestudyoflumbarfacetarthroplastyinthetreatmentofdegenerativespondylolisthesisandstenosisearlycosteffectiveassessmentfromthetotalposteriorspinesystemtopsidestudy