Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony
The witness himself directly testifies and testifies on it or by witnesses to the incident being informed of that event and testifying to his testimony. The one who witnesses the event and testifies about it, his testimony is the original testimony. And he himself bears witness, and the one who test...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
2020-02-01
|
| Series: | آموزههای فقه مدني |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_477_7e7d4d685d73060f6c63c971f8eb0c69.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849419375931555840 |
|---|---|
| author | Seyed Jafar Alavi Gholam Heidar Rezvani |
| author_facet | Seyed Jafar Alavi Gholam Heidar Rezvani |
| author_sort | Seyed Jafar Alavi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The witness himself directly testifies and testifies on it or by witnesses to the incident being informed of that event and testifying to his testimony. The one who witnesses the event and testifies about it, his testimony is the original testimony. And he himself bears witness, and the one who testifies to his testimony before the ruler is called his subordinate witness, and he himself is called the subordinate witness. Since the presence of the original witness is often overlooked, it is necessary to elucidate and expurgation this argument. Many jurisprudents have accepted testimony on the testimony by following of seven conditions as evidence to prove the claim; which have been explicitly stated and some have been stated in their phrases. But from the point of view of this research, there is no convincing reason for satisfying the first, second, fifth, sixth, and seventh conditions, so these conditions can be criticized and seem unnecessary. Famous reasons in support of the inadmissibility of testimony on the testimony of subordinate witnesses which is in expression is third-party testimony is also said to be defective and the credibility of the third testimony is defensible. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e7cda743fe214a59a8455c45b1dfbe8f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2251-936X 2783-3690 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-02-01 |
| publisher | Razavi University of Islamic Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | آموزههای فقه مدني |
| spelling | doaj-art-e7cda743fe214a59a8455c45b1dfbe8f2025-08-20T03:32:07ZfasRazavi University of Islamic Sciencesآموزههای فقه مدني2251-936X2783-36902020-02-01112015317810.30513/cjd.2020.477477Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on TestimonySeyed Jafar Alavi0Gholam Heidar Rezvani1Assistant professor at Razavi UniversityPhD student of Criminal JurisprudenceThe witness himself directly testifies and testifies on it or by witnesses to the incident being informed of that event and testifying to his testimony. The one who witnesses the event and testifies about it, his testimony is the original testimony. And he himself bears witness, and the one who testifies to his testimony before the ruler is called his subordinate witness, and he himself is called the subordinate witness. Since the presence of the original witness is often overlooked, it is necessary to elucidate and expurgation this argument. Many jurisprudents have accepted testimony on the testimony by following of seven conditions as evidence to prove the claim; which have been explicitly stated and some have been stated in their phrases. But from the point of view of this research, there is no convincing reason for satisfying the first, second, fifth, sixth, and seventh conditions, so these conditions can be criticized and seem unnecessary. Famous reasons in support of the inadmissibility of testimony on the testimony of subordinate witnesses which is in expression is third-party testimony is also said to be defective and the credibility of the third testimony is defensible.https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_477_7e7d4d685d73060f6c63c971f8eb0c69.pdftestimonytestimony on testimonysubrogation testimonyprinciple witnesssubsidiary witness |
| spellingShingle | Seyed Jafar Alavi Gholam Heidar Rezvani Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony آموزههای فقه مدني testimony testimony on testimony subrogation testimony principle witness subsidiary witness |
| title | Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony |
| title_full | Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony |
| title_fullStr | Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony |
| title_short | Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony |
| title_sort | investigation of the famous theory of testimony on testimony |
| topic | testimony testimony on testimony subrogation testimony principle witness subsidiary witness |
| url | https://cjd.razavi.ac.ir/article_477_7e7d4d685d73060f6c63c971f8eb0c69.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT seyedjafaralavi investigationofthefamoustheoryoftestimonyontestimony AT gholamheidarrezvani investigationofthefamoustheoryoftestimonyontestimony |