Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique

Background. Acceptance of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) has proven difficult, due to surgical complexity and concerns regarding long-term outcomes. We herein present a standard technique for ipsilateral DKT and compare outcomes to single-kidney transplant (SKT) recipients. Methods. A retrospecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana K. Islam, Richard J. Knight, Wesley A. Mayer, Adam B. Hollander, Samir Patel, Larry D. Teeter, Edward A. Graviss, Ashish Saharia, Hemangshu Podder, Emad H. Asham, A. Osama Gaber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2586761
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561257086976000
author Ana K. Islam
Richard J. Knight
Wesley A. Mayer
Adam B. Hollander
Samir Patel
Larry D. Teeter
Edward A. Graviss
Ashish Saharia
Hemangshu Podder
Emad H. Asham
A. Osama Gaber
author_facet Ana K. Islam
Richard J. Knight
Wesley A. Mayer
Adam B. Hollander
Samir Patel
Larry D. Teeter
Edward A. Graviss
Ashish Saharia
Hemangshu Podder
Emad H. Asham
A. Osama Gaber
author_sort Ana K. Islam
collection DOAJ
description Background. Acceptance of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) has proven difficult, due to surgical complexity and concerns regarding long-term outcomes. We herein present a standard technique for ipsilateral DKT and compare outcomes to single-kidney transplant (SKT) recipients. Methods. A retrospective single-center comparison of DKT and SKT performed between February 2007 and July 2013. Results. Of 516 deceased donor kidney transplants, 29 were DKT and 487 were SKT. Mean follow-up was 43 ± 67 months. DKT recipients were older and more likely than SKT recipients to receive an extended criteria graft (p<0.001). For DKT versus SKT, the rates of delayed graft function (10.3 versus 9.2%) and acute rejection (20.7 versus 22.4%) were equivalent (p = ns). A higher than expected urologic complication rate in the DKT cohort (14 versus 2%, p<0.01) was reduced through modification of the ureteral anastomosis. Graft survival was equivalent between DKT and SKT groups (p = ns) with actuarial 3-year DKT patient and graft survivals of 100% and 93%. At 3 years, the groups had similar renal function (p = ns). Conclusions. By utilizing extended criteria donor organs as DKT, the donor pool was enlarged while providing excellent patient and graft survival. The DKT urologic complication rate was reduced by modification of the ureteral anastomosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7ba3493ea164a949e136886d00476ce
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0007
2090-0015
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Transplantation
spelling doaj-art-e7ba3493ea164a949e136886d00476ce2025-02-03T01:25:30ZengWileyJournal of Transplantation2090-00072090-00152016-01-01201610.1155/2016/25867612586761Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical TechniqueAna K. Islam0Richard J. Knight1Wesley A. Mayer2Adam B. Hollander3Samir Patel4Larry D. Teeter5Edward A. Graviss6Ashish Saharia7Hemangshu Podder8Emad H. Asham9A. Osama Gaber10Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USABackground. Acceptance of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) has proven difficult, due to surgical complexity and concerns regarding long-term outcomes. We herein present a standard technique for ipsilateral DKT and compare outcomes to single-kidney transplant (SKT) recipients. Methods. A retrospective single-center comparison of DKT and SKT performed between February 2007 and July 2013. Results. Of 516 deceased donor kidney transplants, 29 were DKT and 487 were SKT. Mean follow-up was 43 ± 67 months. DKT recipients were older and more likely than SKT recipients to receive an extended criteria graft (p<0.001). For DKT versus SKT, the rates of delayed graft function (10.3 versus 9.2%) and acute rejection (20.7 versus 22.4%) were equivalent (p = ns). A higher than expected urologic complication rate in the DKT cohort (14 versus 2%, p<0.01) was reduced through modification of the ureteral anastomosis. Graft survival was equivalent between DKT and SKT groups (p = ns) with actuarial 3-year DKT patient and graft survivals of 100% and 93%. At 3 years, the groups had similar renal function (p = ns). Conclusions. By utilizing extended criteria donor organs as DKT, the donor pool was enlarged while providing excellent patient and graft survival. The DKT urologic complication rate was reduced by modification of the ureteral anastomosis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2586761
spellingShingle Ana K. Islam
Richard J. Knight
Wesley A. Mayer
Adam B. Hollander
Samir Patel
Larry D. Teeter
Edward A. Graviss
Ashish Saharia
Hemangshu Podder
Emad H. Asham
A. Osama Gaber
Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique
Journal of Transplantation
title Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique
title_full Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique
title_fullStr Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique
title_full_unstemmed Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique
title_short Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Dual Adult versus Single-Kidney Transplantation: Evolution of a Surgical Technique
title_sort intermediate term outcomes of dual adult versus single kidney transplantation evolution of a surgical technique
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2586761
work_keys_str_mv AT anakislam intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT richardjknight intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT wesleyamayer intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT adambhollander intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT samirpatel intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT larrydteeter intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT edwardagraviss intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT ashishsaharia intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT hemangshupodder intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT emadhasham intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique
AT aosamagaber intermediatetermoutcomesofdualadultversussinglekidneytransplantationevolutionofasurgicaltechnique