(De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test

Faced with the twin challenges of globalization and de-globalization, do religions exercise agency in these trends? In other words, do they give shape to them, or are they rather shaped by them? If the influence is reciprocal, how should the process behind this be described? This article sets itself...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beilei Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/75
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587604669759488
author Beilei Bai
author_facet Beilei Bai
author_sort Beilei Bai
collection DOAJ
description Faced with the twin challenges of globalization and de-globalization, do religions exercise agency in these trends? In other words, do they give shape to them, or are they rather shaped by them? If the influence is reciprocal, how should the process behind this be described? This article sets itself two tasks. Firstly, it endeavors to develop a theoretical framework by which to conceptualize the question just posed. Secondly, it applies this framework to the case of China and, more cursorily, to the East Asian context in general. I start my analysis by approaching “globalization” as a shared vision of the world, referred to, in this article, as the “global imaginary”. The recent erosion of the latter has led to “deglobalization”, a set of narratives that remain correlated to the globalist storyline they confront. Central to the topic is that fact that the crisis experienced by the global imaginary affects the interplay between its secular and religious dimensions. The secular imaginary had fostered a homogenous narrative that has caused both ontological and epistemological crises. The resurgence of religious discourse within the narratives of deglobalization is to be understood as part and parcel of competing interpretations of the global modernization process, since the latter obeys both secular and religious forces. Focusing in the second part of this article on trends and representations proper to China in its regional context enables us to better assess how the globalization and deglobalization narratives intermingle in religious and secular dimensions in a way that reshapes each of them.
format Article
id doaj-art-e796b8335c954a1ebbc445f7394bfb9a
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-1444
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj-art-e796b8335c954a1ebbc445f7394bfb9a2025-01-24T13:47:32ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442025-01-011617510.3390/rel16010075(De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus TestBeilei Bai0Department of Religious Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, ChinaFaced with the twin challenges of globalization and de-globalization, do religions exercise agency in these trends? In other words, do they give shape to them, or are they rather shaped by them? If the influence is reciprocal, how should the process behind this be described? This article sets itself two tasks. Firstly, it endeavors to develop a theoretical framework by which to conceptualize the question just posed. Secondly, it applies this framework to the case of China and, more cursorily, to the East Asian context in general. I start my analysis by approaching “globalization” as a shared vision of the world, referred to, in this article, as the “global imaginary”. The recent erosion of the latter has led to “deglobalization”, a set of narratives that remain correlated to the globalist storyline they confront. Central to the topic is that fact that the crisis experienced by the global imaginary affects the interplay between its secular and religious dimensions. The secular imaginary had fostered a homogenous narrative that has caused both ontological and epistemological crises. The resurgence of religious discourse within the narratives of deglobalization is to be understood as part and parcel of competing interpretations of the global modernization process, since the latter obeys both secular and religious forces. Focusing in the second part of this article on trends and representations proper to China in its regional context enables us to better assess how the globalization and deglobalization narratives intermingle in religious and secular dimensions in a way that reshapes each of them.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/75ChinaConfucianismdeglobalizationEast Asiaglobalizationimaginary
spellingShingle Beilei Bai
(De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test
Religions
China
Confucianism
deglobalization
East Asia
globalization
imaginary
title (De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test
title_full (De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test
title_fullStr (De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test
title_full_unstemmed (De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test
title_short (De)Globalization, the Global Imaginary, and Religious Narratives: A Theoretical Framework and the East Asia Litmus Test
title_sort de globalization the global imaginary and religious narratives a theoretical framework and the east asia litmus test
topic China
Confucianism
deglobalization
East Asia
globalization
imaginary
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/75
work_keys_str_mv AT beileibai deglobalizationtheglobalimaginaryandreligiousnarrativesatheoreticalframeworkandtheeastasialitmustest