The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease

Abstract This study aimed to explore the characteristics of the natural Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) in eyes with different macular lesions. In this retrospective study, 37 patients (39 eyes) suffered from macular diseases (MD) were included, and the following data were collected: best corrected vi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shengnan Li, Danjie Li, Li Wang, Huimin Lin, Jinglin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88421-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849343489191444480
author Shengnan Li
Danjie Li
Li Wang
Huimin Lin
Jinglin Zhang
author_facet Shengnan Li
Danjie Li
Li Wang
Huimin Lin
Jinglin Zhang
author_sort Shengnan Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study aimed to explore the characteristics of the natural Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) in eyes with different macular lesions. In this retrospective study, 37 patients (39 eyes) suffered from macular diseases (MD) were included, and the following data were collected: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean sensitivity of macular area in 10 deg diameter (MS), bivariate contour ellipse area (63% BCEA and 95% BCEA), fixation stability, and fundus images and sectional images of the fovea. A natural PRL did not develop in 10 eyes with macular disease. A total of 29 eyes developed natural PRLs: 42% developed superior PRLs, 17% developed temporal PRLs, 24% developed nasal PRLs, 7% developed multiple PRLs, 10% developed PRLs inside the “dark area”, and there were no independent inferior PRLs. In the inside group, the mean MS was significantly lower than that of the other four groups; and the variations in log BCEA were greater in group M compared with group S (P < 0.01), group T (P < 0.01) and group N (P < 0.01), but there were no obvious differences among group S, group T and group N. A natural PRL tends to be more localized in the upper retina, possibly to preserve the lower visual field, followed by nasal and temporal, and rarely localized in the lower retina, and multiple scattered PRLs can be formed when the lesion was widespread. If the function of the fovea exists, even if the lesion in the macular area is clear, the patient still uses the fovea for central fixation and does not form PRL.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7682eb230424998b17b3877fcae0100
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-e7682eb230424998b17b3877fcae01002025-08-20T03:42:57ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115111210.1038/s41598-025-88421-6The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular diseaseShengnan Li0Danjie Li1Li Wang2Huimin Lin3Jinglin Zhang4Sichuan Eye Hospital, AIER Eye Hospital GroupSichuan Eye Hospital, AIER Eye Hospital GroupSichuan Eye Hospital, AIER Eye Hospital GroupGuangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityAbstract This study aimed to explore the characteristics of the natural Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) in eyes with different macular lesions. In this retrospective study, 37 patients (39 eyes) suffered from macular diseases (MD) were included, and the following data were collected: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean sensitivity of macular area in 10 deg diameter (MS), bivariate contour ellipse area (63% BCEA and 95% BCEA), fixation stability, and fundus images and sectional images of the fovea. A natural PRL did not develop in 10 eyes with macular disease. A total of 29 eyes developed natural PRLs: 42% developed superior PRLs, 17% developed temporal PRLs, 24% developed nasal PRLs, 7% developed multiple PRLs, 10% developed PRLs inside the “dark area”, and there were no independent inferior PRLs. In the inside group, the mean MS was significantly lower than that of the other four groups; and the variations in log BCEA were greater in group M compared with group S (P < 0.01), group T (P < 0.01) and group N (P < 0.01), but there were no obvious differences among group S, group T and group N. A natural PRL tends to be more localized in the upper retina, possibly to preserve the lower visual field, followed by nasal and temporal, and rarely localized in the lower retina, and multiple scattered PRLs can be formed when the lesion was widespread. If the function of the fovea exists, even if the lesion in the macular area is clear, the patient still uses the fovea for central fixation and does not form PRL.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88421-6Preferred retinal locusBiofeedback trainingChoroidal neovascularizationMacular holeFovea dysfunctionCentral vision loss
spellingShingle Shengnan Li
Danjie Li
Li Wang
Huimin Lin
Jinglin Zhang
The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
Scientific Reports
Preferred retinal locus
Biofeedback training
Choroidal neovascularization
Macular hole
Fovea dysfunction
Central vision loss
title The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
title_full The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
title_fullStr The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
title_full_unstemmed The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
title_short The natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
title_sort natural preferred retinal locus in patients with macular disease
topic Preferred retinal locus
Biofeedback training
Choroidal neovascularization
Macular hole
Fovea dysfunction
Central vision loss
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88421-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shengnanli thenaturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT danjieli thenaturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT liwang thenaturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT huiminlin thenaturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT jinglinzhang thenaturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT shengnanli naturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT danjieli naturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT liwang naturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT huiminlin naturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT jinglinzhang naturalpreferredretinallocusinpatientswithmaculardisease